Main content
Course: LSAT > Unit 1
Lesson 5: Analytical Reasoning – Worked examples- Ordering setup | Overview | Rules and deductions
- Ordering setup | Given info–basic 1 | Worked example
- Ordering setup | Given info–basic 2 | Worked example
- Ordering setup | Given info–could be true | Worked example
- Ordering setup | Given info–cannot be true 1 | Worked example
- Ordering setup | Given info–cannot be true 2 | Worked example
- Ordering setup | Given info–must be true | Worked example
- Ordering setup | New info–could be true 1 | Worked example
- Ordering setup | New info–could be true 2 | Worked example
- Ordering setup | New info–could be true 3 | Worked example
- Ordering setup | Completely determines | Worked example
- Ordering setup | New info-must be true | Worked example
- Grouping setup | Overview | Rules and deductions
- Grouping setup | Given info–basic | Worked example
- Grouping setup | Given info–could be true | Worked example
- Grouping setup | Given info–must be false | Worked example
- Grouping setup | Given info–must be true 1 | Worked example
- Grouping setup | Given info–must be true 2 | Worked example
- Grouping setup | New info–could be true 1 | Worked example
- Grouping setup | New info–could be true 2 | Worked example
- Grouping setup | New info–must be true | Worked example
- Grouping setup | "Completely determines" | Worked example
- Mixed setup | Overview | Rules and deductions
- Mixed setup | Given info–basic | Worked example
- Mixed setup | Given info–could be true 1 | Worked example
- Mixed setup | Given info–could be true 2 | Worked example
- Mixed setup | Given info–must be true | Worked example
- Mixed setup | Given info–cannot be true | Worked example
- Mixed setup | New info–could be true | Worked example
- Mixed setup | New info–must be true 1 | Worked example
- Mixed setup | New info–must be true 2 | Worked example
- Mixed setup | Rule substitution | Worked example
© 2024 Khan AcademyTerms of usePrivacy PolicyCookie Notice
Ordering setup | Given info–basic 2 | Worked example
Watch a demonstration of one way to approach a "Given info: basic orientation" question on an ordering setup from the analytical reasoning section of the LSAT.
Want to join the conversation?
Ten times more helpful than a book, thank you!(3 votes)
Video transcript
- [Instructor] Make sure
that you've already watched the setup video in which we
created the initial diagram that you see here. This question asks, which
one of the following could be the pair of monuments that were begun in the same year as each other. This is a wonderful question
because we'll be able to make short work of it
thanks to the deductions we made in our initial setup. Because we had deduced
that L, F, and H cannot be begun in 601 together,
and 601 is the only year that can have a pair of monuments, that left only G, M, and S
to be candidates for 601. That means that two of G, M,
and S are the monuments paired in 601 together. The answer has to be E
because M and S could be in the same year as each other. Here's one way that that could work. We could have M, S in 601, G, L, F in 234, and then H in five. Again, E is the answer
and we were able to get it very quickly thanks to
our initial deductions.