Main content
Course: LSAT > Unit 1
Lesson 5: Analytical Reasoning – Worked examples- Ordering setup | Overview | Rules and deductions
- Ordering setup | Given info–basic 1 | Worked example
- Ordering setup | Given info–basic 2 | Worked example
- Ordering setup | Given info–could be true | Worked example
- Ordering setup | Given info–cannot be true 1 | Worked example
- Ordering setup | Given info–cannot be true 2 | Worked example
- Ordering setup | Given info–must be true | Worked example
- Ordering setup | New info–could be true 1 | Worked example
- Ordering setup | New info–could be true 2 | Worked example
- Ordering setup | New info–could be true 3 | Worked example
- Ordering setup | Completely determines | Worked example
- Ordering setup | New info-must be true | Worked example
- Grouping setup | Overview | Rules and deductions
- Grouping setup | Given info–basic | Worked example
- Grouping setup | Given info–could be true | Worked example
- Grouping setup | Given info–must be false | Worked example
- Grouping setup | Given info–must be true 1 | Worked example
- Grouping setup | Given info–must be true 2 | Worked example
- Grouping setup | New info–could be true 1 | Worked example
- Grouping setup | New info–could be true 2 | Worked example
- Grouping setup | New info–must be true | Worked example
- Grouping setup | "Completely determines" | Worked example
- Mixed setup | Overview | Rules and deductions
- Mixed setup | Given info–basic | Worked example
- Mixed setup | Given info–could be true 1 | Worked example
- Mixed setup | Given info–could be true 2 | Worked example
- Mixed setup | Given info–must be true | Worked example
- Mixed setup | Given info–cannot be true | Worked example
- Mixed setup | New info–could be true | Worked example
- Mixed setup | New info–must be true 1 | Worked example
- Mixed setup | New info–must be true 2 | Worked example
- Mixed setup | Rule substitution | Worked example
© 2024 Khan AcademyTerms of usePrivacy PolicyCookie Notice
Mixed setup | New info–must be true 2 | Worked example
Watch a demonstration of how to approach a mixed setup question that gives you a new condition and asks for a complete and accurate list of what must be true on the Analytical Reasoning section of the LSAT.
Want to join the conversation?
Once again, this question can be solved without the mistaken assumption carried over from the setup video.(14 votes)
And actually the faulty deductions in scenario 1 weren't even made in the setup video, so I'm not sure how they got here.(6 votes)
Can someone re-explain the scenario issue. i don't remember which video it is introduced. I appreciate these lessons by the way.(1 vote)
Video transcript
- [Instructor] Before you watch this video make sure to watch the overview video for this set up first. That's where we notated the
rules and made the deductions that you're gonna see me using here. So the question asks,
if Greer is interviewed in the fourth segment,
which one of the following is a complete and accurate list of the politicians who must be interviewed in the third segment? We're being asked to identify who are all of the politicians who
have to be interviewed in the third segment if Greer
is in the fourth segment. So first, we can see
that only scenario one applies in this question, since Greer can't be
interviewed in segment four in scenario two. Great, and if Greer is
in the fourth segment in scenario one, that means
that Lewis has to be first. So who are all the politicians
who must be interviewed in the third segment? It must be Munson and
Kim and that's choice D. You can see that building the scenarios in the set up really helped us to get to this answer quickly. We don't have to test
out any of the choices with our pencil.