Main content
MCAT
Course: MCAT > Unit 13
Lesson 2: Demographics- Demographic characteristics and processes
- Demographic structure of society - age
- Demographic structure of society - race and ethnicity
- Demographic structure of society - immigration
- Demographic structure of society - sex, gender, and sexual orientation
- Demographic structure of society overview
- Urbanization
- What is urban growth?
- Population dynamics
- Demographic transition
- Globalization theories
- Globalization- trade and transnational corporations
- Social movements
- Overview of demographics
© 2023 Khan AcademyTerms of usePrivacy PolicyCookie Notice
Demographic transition
Created by Sydney Brown.
Want to join the conversation?
- It wasn't obvious to me what the pyramid charts were graphing. It would be nice if you labeled the axises.(49 votes)
- Agreed. Based on the info provided by this website (http://pages.uwc.edu/keith.montgomery/Demotrans/demtran.htm) I think that the y-axis represents the age variable (e.g. 0-10yr, 10-20yr, etc) and that the x-axis represents the # of people. The dashed midline is where the zero mark. The violet and red lines are for each sex (i.e. male and female).(13 votes)
- where is the canada among the stages?(5 votes)
- If you look at the population pyramid of Canada on Google Image, you'll see that it's clearly at stage 4.(1 vote)
- Can someone explain the Malthusian Theory and if it predicts a decrease or stabilization in population?(2 votes)
- Malthus believed that the exponential growth of our population will deplete our resources (that is growing "arithmetically") and basically calls upon the urgency of population control.
(http://cgge.aag.org/PopulationandNaturalResources1e/CF_PopNatRes_Jan10/CF_PopNatRes_Jan108.html)
Also, I think that the lecturer said that Malthusians believe in the need for stabilization in population at5:39(3 votes)
- Atshe says "high stationary population pyramid" but the "Overview of demographics" video has a correction that says it's expansive population pyramid, not high stationary. But the correction doesn't make sense to me because birth and death rates are both high so the overall population is neither increasing nor decreasing, so shouldn't it be stationary? 3:13(2 votes)
- Ya...so fertility generally has a larger effect on population growth than death rate because in this day and age, death rates are generally decreasing (unless we have a huge death rate due to an epidemic or war). Yes, the birth and death rate are high, but the birth is often higher than the relatively high death, so "expansive" is a better label.
The way I reason it, is that these graphs are snap shots, where as population growth is dynamic. In a country where the birth rate is high due to kids being useful to the economy, and where the death rate is high due to low health care, the birth rate will decrease if there is a social change and kids are not used as workers whereas death rates will decrease if sanitation and care for the elderly improves. The latter occurs more readily, so the death rate will start to slowly decrease even though the birth rate is high, leading to stage 2! In other words, I'd call stage one early expansive :)(2 votes)
- 5:30
At Stage 4 of the model, if the life expectancy is said to be longer, than shouldn't you have drawn the graph taller?(1 vote) - This seems to state that population, after a long decline, eventually stabilizes, but it gives no reason for the end of population decline. Rather, it seems to state that in the future, after some period of decline, the population will magically? "balance" and remain stable. But everything else I read says that once total reproduction rate, followed by population population, begin to fall we recognize no cause for it to stop falling. All the way to zero. Comments?(1 vote)
- Which of the stages shows natural increase, thanks.(1 vote)
- Not a question, just a statement: when Sydney says that some governments, like China, are introducing government policies to encourage smaller families - however, coincidentally on this day in 2015 (10 June), China announced that it was removing it's one-child policy and returning to the 2-child policy it had before 1980 since their culture of favoring boys over girls has resulted in a much larger male population over female population. This is also compounded by the fact that culturally people take care of their grandparents and parents as they age, so a couple would have 4 parents between them to care for since neither person in the couple has a sibling (due to the 1-child policy their parents were under). 6:57(1 vote)
- After 23 years, about half of Zed's original population will no longer the majority. Probably less, because that assumes the immigrants will not have children when in real life they usually have more births per woman than the natives of the country. It also assumes that the population was 100% homogenous, which probably isn't the case.(1 vote)
- So... in stage five nobody knows what will happen. I have a theory. The population will age so that there's a lot of elderly people and they need younger people to take care of them. The younger people will have more children after they realize that if they don't, they might end up being old with no one to take care of them. Does anyone else have any theories?(1 vote)
Video transcript
Voiceover: Demographic
transition is a model that changes in a country's population. It states that the population
will eventually stop growing when the country
transitions from high birth rates and high death
rates to low birth rates and death rates,
stabilizing the population. This stabilization often
occurs in industrialized countries, because less
developed countries tend to rely on and follow the
more developed countries for their advancements. Right now, most countries
have a positive growth rate, which means their
population keeps getting bigger. First, let's pin down
what the growth rate is. Growth rate measures
how much the population of a country grows or shrinks
over some time period. For example, let's take
a look at this country. I'm going to call it "Zed". Zed, here, had one million
people at the beginning of the year. If we want to know the
growth rate of the population of Zed for the year, we
count how many people were added to the population
and how many people were removed. The number of people
added includes the number of births and the number
of people who immigrated into the country during that year. Let's say 20,000 babies
were born this year and 50,000 people moved to
Zed from other countries. Then you have to subtract
from this number how many people were removed
from the population, so the number of deaths
and the number of people who emigrated from the
country during that year. Let's say, during the year,
15,000 people died and 5000 people moved out of Zed. From here, it's pretty
easy to figure out the population of Zed at the end of the year. Started with one million,
add 20,000 births and 50,000 immigrants and
subtract 15,000 deaths and 5000 emigrants, which
gives us 1,050,000 people at the end of the year. If we want the growth rate
over this year, all you need to do is take that
total current population, subtract the total number
of people in the country at the beginning of the
year, and then divide by that number again. Multiply it by 100 and you
turn it into a percentage. Now you have your growth rate. So now you can see why,
when we say there's a positive growth rate, that
means that the population is now bigger than the
population in the past. But why do most countries currently have a positive growth rate? There are economic benefits,
because children can work to help support the family. Sometimes, the government
even provides incentives to families for each child,
like in Japan, where birth rates are very low. Religion also influences
population growth, because it often promotes large
families, which increase the number of people in their
faith and encourages stronger community. Some religions will even forbid the use of contraceptives by their
followers, pretty much ensuring large families. And there are cultural
influences that promote large families, too. Having children means
that a person is passing down their own family's traits and values. There's a kind of prestige
that goes along with having children. Okay, now let's dive into
the demographic transition model. There are five stages to the demographic transition model. In Stage 1, a country has
high birth rates, often due to limited birth control
and the economic benefit of having more people to work. They also have high
death rates, due to poor nutrition or high rates of disease. It is believed that most
countries were at Stage 1 until the 18th Century,
when death rates in western Europe began to fall. You can see this type of
population modeled by a high stationary population
pyramid, with a high birth rate. This pyramid shows the
number of people alive in a population, depending on age and gender. As you can see, the Stage
1 stationary population has many births, creating a
large young population, as well as many deaths,
creating a small older population and keeping
the over all population fairly stable. The second stage is seen
in the beginnings of the developing country. The population begins to
rise as death rates drop, because of improvements
in health and sanitation and the availability of food. This trend can be seen
in western Europe in the 19th Century, after the
Industrial Revolution. The birth rates are about
the same as they were in Stage 1, though, so the
over all population begins to grow. This is an early expanding
population pyramid. You have high birth rates still,
see, lots of young people, but the death rate is
declining, so you have more older people, making
this nice pyramid shape. In Stage 3, the death
rates continue to drop, but at the same time, birth
rates also begin to fall because of access to
contraception and a changing social trend toward smaller families. The society has better
health care and is becoming more industrialized by this
point, meaning there are fewer childhood deaths and
also the kids don't need to work, or aren't allowed
to work by law any more. Having lots of children
isn't economically beneficial any more, as the kids are
sent to school, rather than working to support the family. Many countries in South
America and the Middle East have such declining birth rates. This population is still
expanding, but at a slower rate. You can see in this late
expanding population pyramid, that, as birth rates decline,
there are fewer young people and, with the
already-declining death rates, people are living longer lives. The population finally
stabilizes in Stage 4 of the demographic transition
model, where both birth rates and death rates
are low and balance each other out. By this point, the population
is rather large, because it had been growing up until this point. The low birth rates are
due to a combination of improvements in contraception
as well as the high percentage of women in
the workforce and the fact that many couples choose
to focus on careers over having children. Countries like the United
States or Australia are in Stage 4 right now. The population can be
modeled by a low stationary pyramid, with low birth
rates and low death rates, as well as a longer life expectancy. The fifth and final stage
is only a speculation. There are few theories
as to what happens next. Some believe that the
world population will be forced to stabilize as
the Malthusian Theorem suggests. Perhaps we will run out of
resources, and there will be a global food shortage. Already, of the more than
seven billion people on our planet, there are about
one billion world-wide who suffer from hunger and malnutrition. The world population
continues to increase but, perhaps, we won't be able
to maintain the natural resources at the rate we
are going for how many people live on this planet,
which Malthusians believe will lead to a major
public health disaster and force the population to remain stable. Or, perhaps, the population
will begin to decrease after it stabilizes, continuing
the trend of decreasing birth rates until it drops
below the death rate. With more people dying
than being born, there would be a negative growth rate. This results in a constrictive
population pyramid, where there are fewer
young people than old. Perhaps this will be because
of a rise in individualism or, perhaps, as the
anti-Malthusian Theorem states, this will be because couples
only want to have one child or they have children later in life. Some evidence shows that
a better standard of living promotes smaller
families, as children become an economic burden,
rather than a source of financial support. Industrialized nations
often have better education and access to health care,
which contribute to more reproductive choices. Some governments, like in
China, are even adopting policies that encourage
small families to slow their population growth and save resources. Or, on the other hand,
perhaps the population will begin to grow again after
the stabilization of the fourth stage. Some evidence shows that
high standards of living actually promote fertility
and a higher birth rate. There's only one real way
for us to find out what will happen next and
we'll have to wait it out and see where the world
is in a century or two. So, I'll see you there, right? To sum it up, demographic
transition is a shift from high birth and death rates
to low birth and death rates as a country becomes
industrialized, but what will happen after that
is impossible to tell. Will the population stabilize? Will it decrease, will increase? Will we move off-planet
and colonize a world around a distant star? We could only guess for now.