Europe 1300 - 1800
- David, the Virgin and Child with Saints and Donor
- Gossaert, Saint Luke Painting the Madonna
- Van Orley and de Pannemaker, The Last Supper
- Pieter Aertsen, Meat Stall
- Bruegel, the Dutch Proverbs
- Bruegel, Tower of Babel
- Pieter Bruegel the Elder, Hunters in the Snow (Winter)
- Bruegel, Hunters in the Snow (Winter)
- Bruegel, Hunters in the Snow
- Pieter Bruegel the Elder, Peasant Wedding
- Reliquary bust of a companion of Saint Ursula
Pieter Bruegel the Elder, The Tower of Babel, 1563, oil on panel, 114 × 155 cm (Kunsthistorisches Museum, Vienna). In the Google Art Project: http://www.googleartproject.com/collection/kunsthistorisches-museum-vienna-museum-of-fine-arts/artwork/the-tower-of-babel-pieter-bruegel-the-elder/807533/. Created by Beth Harris and Steven Zucker.
Want to join the conversation?
- Is this a painting of a real building?(6 votes)
- That is a depiction of the 'Tower of Babel' as told in chapters 10 and 11 of Genesis in the Bible. Here is a Wikipedia article that explains historical buildings that my have been similar to this one.
- in the painting the tower seems to have it's floor at a very high slant is this just me or was this on purpose or an accident?(2 votes)
- This is intentional: the tower, being built by man, isn't planned well. As you can see, it's already crumbling and falling into ruin during the construction too.(3 votes)
- That detail is phenomenal. How long did it take to paint this? Was it commissioned? It would seem strange that someone with the wealth to commission a work of art like this would be incline to support the apparent message.(2 votes)
This Wikipedia article might give you some insight:
BETH HARRIS: We're in the Kunsthistorisches Museum in Vienna and we're looking at Bruegel's amazing painting, "The Tower of Babel." STEVEN ZUCKER: I really love this painting. BETH HARRIS: Me too. STEVEN ZUCKER: It's just there's so much to look at, and it reminds you that before movies, before video, paintings could be incredibly entertaining. And here's an image that gives us so many little narratives, so many things to look at. BETH HARRIS: It really does reward close, prolonged looking. STEVEN ZUCKER: So this story comes from the Bible. Man decided to build a building that would be so high that it would reach into the heavens. It would reach god. BETH HARRIS: And God didn't like that. STEVEN ZUCKER: No, not one bit. So the way that God took care of this was sort of wonderful and elegant. Humanity had been one people up to this time. But God said, now he would divide man by language so that when these men could no longer communicate with each other the building couldn't be built. But Bruegel is painting this now in the Renaissance, and there's a different set of meanings. Yes, the Bible is the underlying story, but there's the politics of his era. BETH HARRIS: When we think about the Renaissance it's hard not to think about the massive building campaigns. Bruegel himself is living in Antwerp, an incredibly wealthy city that trades in luxury goods. STEVEN ZUCKER: So in some ways this is about the dangers of man's success. BETH HARRIS: All the things that we build, all the things that we create, all of the power and wealth that we have is really nothing before God. STEVEN ZUCKER: I think Bruegel makes that point rather nicely in the lower left corner of the painting where you see a king who is presumably the man who is ordering the building of this monument. And you see the workers who are actually carving stone but also bowing down to him. BETH HARRIS: There's a kind of irony there because as the workers bow down to him we knows that this tower that they're building at his request is going to utterly fail. And in fact, it is failing right before our eyes and before theirs, if only they would notice it too. STEVEN ZUCKER: You mean even as it's being built it's so large that it's also falling apart. In fact, the whole tower, although it seems so massive and so solid, is leaning to the left slightly. And it seems to be almost menacing the medieval city that's just beyond it. BETH HARRIS: There are some places where it seems very unfinished. I mean, if we look at the center there's uncut rock, and then in other areas it looks completed. And in other areas there's scaffolding. There's this sense that it's rising and falling simultaneously. STEVEN ZUCKER: You know, the whole thing really looks believable. You see winches and cranes. BETH HARRIS: Hoists. STEVEN ZUCKER: And sort of the basic construct itself seems to be loosely based on the Colosseum in Rome, which Bruegel would have seen when he visited that city. And so the whole thing really does seem as if it's possible, and there is the sense that here in the Renaissance man has become so capable, and what are the dangers of that? And it is an issue that, even in the modern era, we still grapple with. If you read science fiction it's always the robots and the computers that are the threat. Right? And in a sense this is an older take on technologies that were perhaps too big for us. BETH HARRIS: Men look like ants everywhere here. STEVEN ZUCKER: You get a sense of trade. You have a sense of materials coming from afar in the ships on the extreme right. You see a large castle, but it's completely dwarfed by the massiveness of the tower itself. BETH HARRIS: There's a total sense of futility here. Everyone is doing something. Everyone is building, or carrying, or carving, or climbing, or doing something to make this happen. And yet as they're so busy we know that it's all for not. And so there's a sense of the complete futility of human endeavor. STEVEN ZUCKER: And even while we know that futility is central, there's still an absolute love of the investigation of the building itself. BETH HARRIS: We really have Bruegel the architect here. The tower is so fun. We want to go into it. We can see through it, and into the arches and spaces and windows, and we want to know what it's like inside. It's a dream like space that is incredibly seductive. STEVEN ZUCKER: So in a sense it's a kind of entrapment. Bruegel is giving us this wonderful, seductive environment. And then he's telling you, you don't want to do this. This isn't all right. BETH HARRIS: It seduces us and entraps us. And it's really difficult to pull your eyes away from it.