Europe 1300 - 1800
- David, the Virgin and Child with Saints and Donor
- Gossaert, Saint Luke Painting the Madonna
- Van Orley and de Pannemaker, The Last Supper
- Pieter Aertsen, Meat Stall
- Bruegel, the Dutch Proverbs
- Bruegel, Tower of Babel
- Pieter Bruegel the Elder, Hunters in the Snow (Winter)
- Bruegel, Hunters in the Snow (Winter)
- Bruegel, Hunters in the Snow
- Pieter Bruegel the Elder, Peasant Wedding
- Reliquary bust of a companion of Saint Ursula
Jan Gossaert, Saint Luke Painting the Madonna, c. 1515-25 (Kunsthistorisches Museum, Vienna) Speakers: Dr. Beth Harris & Dr. Steven Zucker. Created by Beth Harris and Steven Zucker.
Want to join the conversation?
- If you think about the Ten Commandments, the first five commandments, on the first tablet are mostly about heavenly issues, how Man relates to his Creator (creators, if you include the obligation to honor parents).
The second set of five relate to how man relates to other men. You pointed out at around3:15that the heavenly and the earthly space in this painting are divided as if onto two tablets. Do you think the artist was consciously trying to imitate the presentation of the Ten Commandments?(17 votes)
- Thou shalt not murder, is one of the commandments, as murder is a better translation for the word that is usually depicted as kill. Thou shalt not kill just sounds better read aloud in English. Modern Bibles did not change the commandments. The ten commandments now are the same ten commandments.(0 votes)
- At0:16we get a nice close up of Saint Luke and his drawing. What is the the tool he is holding in his hand to draw with?(8 votes)
- Might I point out that putting horns on Moses is not strictly "christian" since there is no reference to him having horns (either literally or figuratively) in the Bible? Isn't this more a reference to the famous sculpture of Moses? (at1:30)(3 votes)
- There is an earlier video about Michelangelo’s Moses which addresses this. I believe it was an incorrect translation of the Bible.
It also refers you to the following link
- At1:04, Steven says 'almost no historical references to their likenesses'. Then what references have survived?(1 vote)
- I was concerned when I read your comment so I listened and what I actually say is, "We have absolutely no historical references..."(4 votes)
- What does Steven say at1:17about how the sculpture of Moses is rendered? "In the top right corner where the artist has rendered ???, in grays..."(1 vote)
- Hi Qrious,
The word I used was "Grisaille." Which usually means painted in one color, often in grays. Thanks for asking.(4 votes)
- At3:22when the speakers talk about the resemblance between Moses' tablets and the rounded arches, by pointing at the top right corner of the right tablet Moses is basically pointing at himself (as he is at the top right corner of the right arch). Could it be a coincidence?(2 votes)
- Did anyone notice or can explain about the foot of the angel behind St Luke? The big toe is so split from the foot that it almost looks like a hand.(2 votes)
- If Luke was a disciple of Christ how was he able to draw the madonna with the child?(1 vote)
- According to the legends in the New Testament, Luke was a friend and disciple of St. Paul.
The video began saying that this painting was based on a legend about St. Luke (not based on a story found in the bible). So, there was a legend that St. Luke drew a picture of the Virgin and Child. OK. And there was a painter who made a picture of that legend. OK. But neither the legend nor the painting need have anything historical to do with Jesus, or Mary, or Luke, or Moses. this is art. The only thing historical here is that a painter made a picture.(3 votes)
(cheerful music) Dr. Steven Zucker: According to legend, St. Luke had a vision of the Virgin Mary and Child, and painted that vision. As a result, he is the patron saint of painters. Dr. Beth Harris: You'll notice that St. Luke's eyes are half-closed, so we know that he is not actually seeing the Virgin and Child in front of him, but having a vision. Dr. Zucker: It is not his painting, in a sense. He is literally the hand of this angel. St. Luke's image, then, of the Virgin Mary and Child has a kind of authority because it is God's, actually, and not his. Dr. Harris: What's interesting then is that the artist, Gossaert, is painting his Virgin Mary and Child not from the same authority as the painter St. Luke, in his painting. One wonders about what it was like for artists to paint heavenly figures. How does one imagine the Virgin Mary? How does one paint Jesus Christ? These are, I think, difficult questions always for artists. Dr. Zucker: Right; we have absolutely no historical references to their likenesses, and so where is the authority of any painter who is transcribing their images? And that issue of even the legitimacy of transcribing an image is called into question in the top right corner, where the artist has rendered [in grise], in greys, a sculpture of Moses. You can tell it's Moses because he's holding the two tablets with the 10 laws. Dr. Harris: The 10 Commandments. Dr. Zucker: In the Christian tradition, he's shown with horns on his head, and so we know it's Moses. Moses seems to actually be pointing at something, and one of the laws is to not render people, not to render the fish below the sea, not to render the birds in the sky. The idea that the artist tries to take on the role of God, perhaps, by trying to create. Dr. Harris: "Thou shalt not create graven images," might be how most people know that commandment. Gossaert is living right at the time that the Protestant reformation begins, and one of the things that Luther's followers talked about is the danger of images, of people worshipping images instead of using them only as an aid in prayer. This is certainly reflecting on the role of the artist and whether images have a legitimacy or not. Dr. Zucker: Well, that's right. This is absolutely supporting the legitimacy of the artist creating religious imagery. Dr. Harris: Because one of the writers of the gospel, St. Luke himself, painted Mary. Dr. Zucker: And the artist has blown out all the stops. He is rendering every detail with a precision that comes out of the Northern tradition. Dr. Harris: We know that Gossaert copied Van Eyck. He's fully steeped in the Northern Rennaisance tradition of painting everything with a clarity and exactitude and attention to different textures. Dr. Zucker: Well, look at the angel's wings. Look at the detail of the relief carving in the architecture. This is an arist who is just enjoying the ability to magically render form. Now, look for just a second back at Moses and those two tablets. Notice the way that the shape of those two tablets rhyme with the architectural space. I think when most art historians look at this painting, they look back to this tradition of dividing the earthly space from the spiritual space. Certainly, that central column does that; but it also makes the entire painting two tablets. There is this way in which the tablets that Moses holds is actually embodied in the architectural space itself. Dr. Harris: That's true. Although we think about the space as being very classical-looking, looking like Ancient Roman architecture, with those round arches and pilasters, it's still to me a very mysterious space, much more like Northern Rennaisance spaces, where, as we look back toward Moses, we have those repeated round arches, moving back into a space that we can't quite determine there. Although the foreground of the painting seems to be carefully mapped out according to the rules of linear perscpective, which obviously Gossaert has learned as a Northern Rennaisance artist from traveling to Italy, but we see so much of the North here. If we look at the drapery that St. Luke wears, it's typical Northern Rennaisance, angular folds of drapery that we see in the art of Campin or Rogier van der Weyden. Dr. Zucker: And so is the color. Dr. Harris: The green that that angel wears against the complementary red color worn by St. Luke. There's a real thoughtfulness about color here. Dr. Zucker: This is an artist who was working in Antwerp, which was one of the great merchantile cities of the 15th and early 16th Centuries. That was a culture and an economy that was based on importation, that was based on trade, and, in some ways, this is a painting that is also trading. Dr. Harris: That idea of the North and the South coming together that we see in the work of [Dore] and beginning with Michael Pacher in the late 15th Century. (lively music)