- Social psychology questions
- Conformity and groupthink
- Conformity and obedience
- Asch conformity studies (Asch line studies)
- Events that inspired the Milgram studies on obedience
- Milgram experiment on obedience
- What can we learn from the Milgram experiment
- Zimbardo prison study The Stanford prison experiment
- A closer look at the Stanford prison experiment
- Factors that influence obedience and conformity
- Bystander effect
- Social facilitation and social loafing
- Agents of socialization
- Socialization questions
Factors that influence obedience and conformity
Visit us (http://www.khanacademy.org/science/healthcare-and-medicine) for health and medicine content or (http://www.khanacademy.org/test-prep/mcat) for MCAT related content. These videos do not provide medical advice and are for informational purposes only. The videos are not intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. Always seek the advice of a qualified health provider with any questions you may have regarding a medical condition. Never disregard professional medical advice or delay in seeking it because of something you have read or seen in any Khan Academy video. Created by Brooke Miller.
Want to join the conversation?
- I don't get how individualists would conform by eating cereal.
I would eat cereal because I like cereal, not because people say that I should eat cereal, or because others are eating cereal.(0 votes)
- It's not that someone is telling you specifically to eat cereal. You conform because it's generally what we do in our culture. This is also a population based assumption versus an individual one. As a culture, cereal is a breakfast food. It is normal to eat cereal for breakfast, and if you told someone you ate cereal they wouldn't think it was abnormal. If alternatively you ate salad for breakfast every morning, and you told your friend about it, he/she would take pause because as a culture salad is not a breakfast food.(17 votes)
- I wouldn't say we consider the doctors more popular. We have outside knowledge that the doctors have been thoroughly trained in health, while the gardeners haven't. That is just rational, not some kind of conformity(3 votes)
- does institutional authority really matter? I remember in a social psych course I learned that Milgram replicated his experiment in a much less prestigious college and the results of the experiment were the same.(2 votes)
- I would say to actually compare the Milgram study, they would have to replicate the study not in another "college", but rather a some random shady company whom people are not aware of. Prestigious college or not, people have similar ideas of how they operate and follow ethical standards.(2 votes)
- Why does having a bad day decrease one's likelihood to conform and having a good day increase one's likelihood to conform?(1 vote)
- from personal experience i know that when i am having a bad day everyone and everything makes me super irritated and if someone tells me to do something i usually want to do the exact opposite(2 votes)
- Why do the conspirators, who know they are engaging in deception, conform to studies like this?(1 vote)
- how do I cite this video for a psychology paper? (APA style)(1 vote)
- I often see that people with depression have a tendency to be "rebels" and not go with the social norms, to not "conform" like the rest of the group. Would this have something to do with the "mood" factor described at6:06where she says "someone with a negative mood will be less likely to conform"?(1 vote)
- I really HATE the labels "individualist" and "collectivist" to refer to groups of people. They are very stereotyping and inaccurate. I lived in both North America and Asia and I did not find that Asian culture was more "collectivist" than North American culture. Many times I thought North American culture was much more collectivist than Asian culture, e.g. many students starting to do drugs in junior high or high school because of peer pressure. I really wonder when people will realize that those labels are biased and ignorant and stop using those labels.(0 votes)
- I think you're both inaccurately using collectivist and individualist to refer to very specific situations of peer pressure, etc. In terms of cultures, collectivist and individualist refer to what is emphasized within the culture as a whole. Western cultures are individualist because in general, personal achievement is favored over group goals, and these achievements are attributed to the individual (e.g. a student's success is due to his hardwork, perseverance and intelligence). In contrast, in collectivist cultures like those of Asia, an achievement by one is considered an achievement by the group (e.g. a student's success is considered to be due to the combined efforts of his family, his school, his peers, etc. and the achievement is shared by them all). This is not to say that families in western cultures don't take pride in the success of their student, but rather that there are differences in what people attribute this success to. I don't think this cultural classification applies to situations like choosing to do drugs because your friends do them - that is not individualism or collectivism but rather can be normative social influence, peer pressure, or various similar things.(5 votes)
- Why does this video say that 30% of participants shocked all the way in the Milgram experiment but the "Milgrim experiment on obedience" video says 65%? Which one is it?(1 vote)
- Observations and questions about conformity influences:0:39! So my suspicion of 15 years is confirmed [somehow i picked up that conformists were more likely to do it in odd numbers and being unanimous].
A third of people would comply - fewer with a supporter. [Asch study].
Defectors are valuable though unaware.1:37admiration of status - admiring and identification are different.1:57cohesion - like in activism which might be more or less about ideas.2:17'because we came in late" / not shared with a group.2:37public response has large effect - happy not to conform with support/acceptance.2:45prior commitments > conformity. against it < conformity.2:55insecurity!(0 votes)
- [Voiceover] You might be wondering whether there are any factors that might make someone more or less likely to conform or the likelihood that they will adjust their behaviors or thinking to go along with the group. And there certainly are. And while I won't go over all of them in this video, I do want to give you a pretty wide or diverse variety so you can see just how much of this behavior can be dependent upon external factors that otherwise might have nothing to do with the person themselves. And the first factor I want to talk about is group size. Specifically, people seem to be more likely to conform when they're in groups of three to five. We are also more likely to conform when the opinion of the group is unanimous or when everyone in the group agrees upon a certain opinion. As an example of this, in one variant of the Asch line study the researchers changed the experiment such that the participant had a supporter, someone who gave the correct answer before it was the participant's turn to answer. And what they found was that even one defector can influence how likely an individual is to comply. So while in the original Asch study, 37% of participants fully complied or complied on every trial, total compliance dropped to only 5% when there was a supporter in the group. When they asked the participants whether or not the presence of that defector in any way influenced their responses, they claimed that they didn't. So while the research does show that the presence of a defector influences how likely we are to conform, it appears that we're not aware of the effect that they can have. If we admire a group status or some other characteristic, we are also more likely to go along with them. And while this can be used to explain why children might be more likely to go along with a popular group, because they admire them or want to be like them, it also explains why we're more likely to trust the opinion of four doctors than four gardeners when it comes to our health decisions. Group cohesion can also have a strong influence on our likelihood to conform. If we have no connection or feel no connection with the group, we feel less of a need to go along with that group. Another factor is whether or not we believe that our behavior is being observed. In a different variant of the Asch line study, the participant was told that because he came in late, he would record his answers on a sheet of paper instead of saying them out loud. And because of this, they're responses were not shared with the group, and when these participants were confident that their answers wouldn't be judged by the others in the room, they were much less likely to conform. Relatedly, how people believe that the public will respond, also can have a large effect. If we think that we'll be met with the public's acceptance, we're happy not to conform, but when we think that we'll be met with shunning, we are much more likely to go along with the group. There are also a number of internal factors that can influence how likely we are to conform. One of those is prior commitments. If we state something upfront, then we're less likely to go against it later on. So a prior commitment to the group's message or direction, can serve to increase conformity, but at the same time, a prior commitment against it will decrease conformity. We're also more likely to conform when we feel or are made to feel insecure. It makes us feel less comfortable about our own knowledge, which increases the likelihood that we're going to follow the judgments of others. There are also a number of factors that can influence obedience. And to review, while conformity can involve us changing how we think, obedience is the act of following directions or instructions or orders without question and without protesting them. And it's usually done in order to avoid negative consequences associated with disobeying. And because of this, a lot of the factors that dictate whether or not we will obey depend on the type of authority that is giving those orders. How close we are to the authority can have a strong influence. We are more likely to accept orders from someone we know and respect than someone who we don't. Interestingly enough, actual physical closeness or physical proximity can also influence it. Participants in the Milgram study were much more likely to obey the commands of the experimenter when they were standing right behind them, as compared to when they were standing in the back of a room or standing in a different room. The legitimacy of the authority also matters. People were more likely to obey commands in the Milgram study when the experimenter was wearing a lab coat and carrying a clipboard, as compared to when they did not. Institutional authority also matters. Milgram's study took place at a well-respected university. And you really don't expect such places to give you harmful commands. And while this institutional authority can be physical, it can also be symbolic. So the institution of the police or the government also tends to bring about a certain authority. Victim distance can also have an effect. In the original Milgram study, participants were in a different room than the learner or the victim. So they couldn't see him. When the study was repeated such that the participant had to physically pick up the learner's hand and place it on the board that would electrocute them, it tended to reduce the likelihood that the participant would obey the commands of the experimenter. But note that this didn't stop everyone. 30% of the participants still gave all of the shocks. This relates to the idea of depersonalization, when the learner or victim is made to seem less human, possibly through stereotypes or prejudices, people are less likely to object to acting against them. And similar to conformity, obedience is also more likely to happen when there are no models of defiance. We're more likely to disobey orders when we see others doing the same. And one thing that you might be wondering after hearing all of this is whether or not there is a certain type of person who is more likely to conform or more likely to obey. And the answer seems to be no. There is no one personality that leads people to be more susceptible to groups or to authority. That said, we do know that people's moods can have a strong effect. People who are having a rough day are less likely to conform than those who are having a good day. We also know that status and culture can play a role. People of a lower social or economic status, so those who don't have a lot of power socially or economically and politically, or those who lack power in general, are more likely to conform. We also know that people in individualistic cultures like the U.S. or western Europe that emphasize personal achievement over group achievement, are less likely to conform than people in collectivist cultures, or cultures that emphasize the family or the group over the individual like China or Korea. But even so, you need to keep in mind, that people in individualistic cultures still conform all the time by doing things like going to school and eating cereal for breakfast. And taken together, all of this helps to describe why perfectly ordinary people can sometimes do very terrible things, but by being aware of these factors, we can also help to reduce them. I remember being really strongly affected by the idea that the presence of just one nonconformer in a group could cause others to not conform as well. It made me consider the fact that by not conforming or not obeying myself, I could have a strong influence on others. And I find a lot of comfort and strength in that idea. I can also take the time to think about why I'm conforming to a group or why I'm obeying an instruction. Knowing the ways in which people can be influenced can give us more insight and possibly more control over these situations.