Main content
MCAT
Course: MCAT > Unit 11
Lesson 7: Social psychology- Social psychology questions
- Conformity and groupthink
- Conformity and obedience
- Asch conformity studies (Asch line studies)
- Events that inspired the Milgram studies on obedience
- Milgram experiment on obedience
- What can we learn from the Milgram experiment
- Zimbardo prison study The Stanford prison experiment
- A closer look at the Stanford prison experiment
- Factors that influence obedience and conformity
- Bystander effect
- Social facilitation and social loafing
- Agents of socialization
- Socialization questions
© 2023 Khan AcademyTerms of usePrivacy PolicyCookie Notice
Social facilitation and social loafing
Created by Jeffrey Walsh.
Want to join the conversation?
- I'm thinking social loafing is somewhat similar to the bystander effect. Since the person tends to act less, given presence of a group. Any thoughts? How are they different, then?(2 votes)
- From how I see it, both are situations where the diffusion of responsibility comes into play. But what makes them difference is the context of the situation. The Bystander effect happens when, say for example, an accident happens and there is a random group of individuals gathered around the area who can help. Because there are a large number of people, the less one is inclined to help.
On the other hand, social loafing seems to happen to organized groups working towards a specific task (e.g. a group project at school). When there are many of you working on a specific project, one person may feel less responsible to contribute anything, will lose their motivation to do anything but will try to hide the fact that they're not exerting effort into the project.
They are similar, but I guess the contexts where you have either happen are different. I hope that makes sense!(18 votes)
- Would the tendency of not voting for a governmental candidate because "I'm just one person so it doesn't really matter if I vote or not" be an example of social loafing? If not, is there another term for this?(4 votes)
- How does social facilitation relate to the Yerkes-Dodson law?(2 votes)
- Thank you for easy explanation, but what I wonder is that so social loafing and social facilitation is conformity or compliance? I think it is conformity because it is changing behavior to be involved in specific group, but those can be compliance? If so, in what ways?(1 vote)
- really enjoyed this dominant response -> learning -> practice and how it works for easy [help?] and difficult tasks [hinder?]. Now I understand social facilitation better. 1:40that is so true about evaluation! 2:23
It's good to have our own goals and group goals/what we want to do.
Does this happen lots in science and social sciences? [we're on the MCAT after all!] It's well known in the humanities.
And it happens on the Internet too.
"[Personal contribution] Inessential to success" = "less concerned about being personally evaluated".
That was a good social psychology question. So the actual speaker had an A+.
"To return to your original question" ... "it depends".(0 votes) - So social loafing is like another form of Deindividualization?(0 votes)
- I believe that deindividualization is more unconscious on the part of the person in a group. Social loafing is more like a person consciously taking the easy path and showing a certain laziness because others will take care of the project.
DEINDIVIDUALIZATION, it must be noted, can be the opportunity for a group which has been oppressed by laws, customs or other types of bullying . The deindividualization may be the only realistic way for the individuals to stand up to the oppressors and change the oppression. ((E.G. the protests in Furgeson, Missouri recently. It is to be noted that this approach can have some negative results besides the fact that the oppression has been brought into the light.(1 vote)
Video transcript
Voiceover: Imagine you're
in front of a group of people and you're about to give a
presentation. You look out at the crowd and you see
dozens of people, and they're all looking at you, waiting
for you to give your presentation. How will the presence of others affect
your behavior? Will it help your performance, or will it
hinder it? According to the concept of social facilitation, the presence of others will
increase the likelihood that the most dominant
response for a particular behavior will be shown. So what does that mean? Well, first, the dominant response refers
to the response that's most likely to occur. So in the context of your presentation it
means that if you practice your presentation for hours on
end, you really know your topic in and out, and you generally make very few
mistakes when you're practicing it, then the presence of others will lead
you to perform very well. It kind of gives you an edge and motivates
you to perform well. However if you haven't practiced your
presentation at all, and even if you did a couple times, and
you made a lot of mistakes, then the presence
of others will probably make you perform more
poorly than usual. In other words it'll kind of exacerbate,
your mistakes. So why does this happen? Well, the presence of others increases
your arousal, or your general physiological or
psychological excitement. Things like your heart rate increasing,
you might be breathing quicker than usual. It's, it's the activation of your
autonomic nervous system essentially. And, this is simply known as nervous
energy. Your increased energy or arousal leads to likelihood of the dominant response
occurring. So whether the dominant response is
correct or accurate depends on how easy or difficult a task is, and how well
you've learned it or rehearsed it. So the presence of others will likely
improve your performance on simple tasks, or tasks that you've learned well over a
course of time, and it'll hinder your performance on difficult
tasks or tasks that you haven't practiced. So some argue that the increased arousal
only takes place when a person's efforts are evaluated, since
the situation becomes more high stakes. So what happens when your behavior isn't
evaluated? Well in the context of the presentation,
example, if you're talking about your presentation concepts with a group of your
close friends, who wouldn't be evaluating you necessarily, you may not have any nervous energy, and your performance
wouldn't be effected by the presence of others
because you're very comfortable with them. But what if you're presenting in a group
or to th, the intended audience? Well, as anyone who has ever given a group presentation knows, that's when things can
go a little south. When a group collectively works toward a common goal and individuals aren't
monitored or evaluated, something called social loafing
is likely to occur, which is a separate concept. So social loafing is a tendency to put
forth less effort when working on a group task, if the
individual contributions aren't evaluated. And if you've ever worked on a group project before you've probably
experienced this. Sometimes there's that one person, or few people in the group, who don't wanna
contribute anything, because they probably figured
that, well, you know, the group will get it done anyway. In other words, it's a group-produced
reduction in individual effort. So why does this happen? Well there are several reasons. First, individuals may see their
contribution as unessential to success, so they may be less concerned about being
personally evaluated. Or they may be trying to guard against
being the person who does all the work. So our presentation example, groups
experiencing social loafing would be less productive, put forth less effort and
generally perform poorly. Now social loafing can be reduced by
making the task more challenging, like adding a new component
to the presentation or separating the performance of individuals in the group,
like giving each person their own grade, as opposed to giving the entire
group the same grade. Or you can make the performance of each
person essential for success, like if each individual in the group had their own
piece to work on for the presentation. So, to return to original question: does the presence of others help or hinder
performance? Well, the answer is: it depends.