Main content
Health and medicine
Course: Health and medicine > Unit 16
Lesson 2: Attention and language- Divided attention, selective attention, inattentional blindness, & change blindness
- Theories of selective attention
- Theories of language and cognition
- Theories of language development: Nativist, learning, interactionist
- Language and the brain: Aphasia and split-brain patients
© 2023 Khan AcademyTerms of usePrivacy PolicyCookie Notice
Theories of selective attention
Learn about the three major theories of selective attention. By Carole Yue. . Created by Carole Yue.
Want to join the conversation?
- I'm just wondering if this is why autistic people get overwhelmed in terms of sensory? They just don't have that filter to select the important things in their world.(10 votes)
- One theory of autism spectrum disorder (the Intense World Theory) posits that ASD individuals have a "super-connected" brain. Though they take-in the same sensory stimulus, the stimulus is aberrantly magnified causing an overwhelming perceptual experience. In this sense, one might imagine how it might be difficult to focus on a single stimulus when experiencing multiple stimuli simultaneously.(7 votes)
- What's the difference between a dichotic listening task and a shadowing task?(6 votes)
- A dichotic listening task is the act of listening to two different phrases in each ear at the same time (ex. abc in the left ear and 123 in the right ear simultaneously). A shadowing task is where the listener in a dichotic listening task is told to pay attention to the phrase heard in one of the ears and then repeat what they heard (ex. Hearing abc in the left ear and 123 in the right ear simultaneously and then being told to repeat what you hear in your left ear, which was ABC).(1 vote)
- I wonder if this is a combination of (more or less) hard-wired attenuation, like paying attention to a squalling infant, and more nuanced learned attenuation, like knowing that a dog's bark will be largely meaningless (at least to most human ears) as opposed to a human voice, which might carry encoded information, like one's name.(6 votes)
- Wouldn't scanning through the attenuated stimuli still be essentially scanning through everything? Maybe I don't understand how exactly this attenuation process is occurring... Can anyone explain attenuation in this context?(2 votes)
- which ear is considered shadowed, the unattended ear or the attended?(2 votes)
- One of the questions in this video section had a theory mentioned by Johnson and Heinz however it was not mentioned within this video...is there a certain reason why certain terms or theories are not included in the videos but are addressed in the section questions?(2 votes)
- Which theory do you think works the best for selective attention? I think Treisman's attenuative theory sounds best! Please answer or comment down below and feel free to disagree or agree with me with a reason :)(1 vote)
- I think researchers could come up wth a more complete theory if they analyzed the many cases where there's a breakdown in any one of those stages, like the filter, or the attenuation, or the processing.(1 vote)
- Concerning Treisman's Attenuation Theory: on what basis does the attenuation take place? What is proposed as the factors deciding which stimuli to weaken or not?(1 vote)
- What is the dynamic filter theory?(1 vote)
- What's the difference between divided attention and selective attention?(1 vote)
- I think both shed light on characteristics of attention and are very much related: theories on selective attention work on the basis that attention is observed to be selective and thus are concerned on revealing and explaining the underlying processes of this selectivity. And it is well researched that a division of attention may impeach on its performance which leads to questions like how does this division take place? On what basis? Division is of course only possible when attention can be selective. I guess one way to see it is that "selective" is more concerned with a fundamental attribute of attention and "divided" is more concerned with the phenomenon that attentional peformance changes when it is divided.(1 vote)
Video transcript
We already know that attention
is a limited resource, and we can't focus on everything
in our environment at once. But how do we filter out
the unimportant information, and how do we
decide when to shift our attention to something new? You've probably
experienced that even when you're in a loud
crowded room, you're pretty good at attending
to the one person who's talking to you. But you still hear bits
and pieces of conversations that you're not
trying to attend to. What those bits and
pieces are and aren't are what interest psychologists
who study selective attention, or your ability to focus
on something that's relevant to the task
at hand while ignoring other information. One way to study
selective attention is to observe
people while they're doing something called
a shadowing task. In this task, you're wearing
a pair of headphones, but different
information is coming in through each ear piece. So through the left ear,
you're hearing one thing, and through the
right ear, you're hearing something
completely different, maybe a different
person's voice, maybe a different
language, even. And you're told to
repeat everything that's said into one ear,
say, your right ear, so you have to pay attention
to it and to ignore the other. Based on what we learn about the
type of unattended information that we actually do and
don't end up comprehending, we can then learn more about
how selective attention works. And there are three
major theories that try to explain
this process. I'm going to talk about
these theories in terms of auditory attention,
but the same idea applies to other senses as well. The first is Broadbent's
early selection theory. Broadbent's idea was
that all the information in your environment goes into
your sensory register, which briefly registers or stores
all the sensory input you get. This includes words, clicks,
sirens, any input at all. Then this input gets transferred
to the selective filter right away, which
identifies what it's supposed to be attending
to via basic physical characteristics. So if we're talking
about language, the selective filter identifies
the voice, pitch, speed, accent, basic things like
that, that you don't really need to understand
in order to identify. Everything else
gets filtered out, and the selected
information gets moved along so that perceptual
processes can occur. These processes assign
meaning to the information. So while the selective
filter identifies the pitch of the one you
want to pay attention to, the perceptual
processes identify it as your friend's voice and
assign meaning to the words. Then you can engage in
other cognitive processes, such as deciding how to respond. Broadbent's theory
was a good start, but there are some problems. If you completely filter out
the unattended information before it gets assigned
meaning, then you shouldn't be able to
identify your own name when it's spoken in an
unattended ear. But as you've
probably experienced, you immediately perk up
when you hear your own name, even when it's across the room
and you haven't been paying attention to that
conversation before. This is known as the
cocktail party effect, and this, among other
things, led to researchers coming up with a new theory. A couple folks named
Deutsch & Deutsch proposed a late selection theory,
which moved Broadbent's selective filter to after
the perceptual processes. This means that you actually
do register and assign everything meaning, but
then your selective filter decides what to pass on to
your conscious awareness. That sounds pretty
good, but keep in mind that all this has to
happen really quickly. Given the limited
resource of attention, and the fact that we know our
brains are super-efficient, it seems a little wasteful to
spend all that effort assigning meaning to stuff
you won't ever need. So the answer may be somewhere
in between early selection and late selection. So we come to Treisman's
attenuation theory of selective attention. Treisman said that instead
of a complete filter, we have something
called an attenuator. Attenuate just means to weaken. So the attenuator weakens but
doesn't eliminate the input from the unattended ear. Then some of it gets through
to the perceptual processes. So we still assign meaning to
stuff in the unattended ear. It's just not as high priority. At this point, if you realize
that the unattended stuff is actually important, then you'll
switch over your attention and attenuate what you were
previously listening to. Later experiments suggested
that the difficulty of the task you're attending
to can affect when filtering occurs and how long it takes. The bottom line is there's still
some debate about which theory is the absolute best. But these three theories
have been pivotal in our understanding
of selective attention. It's important to
consider because attention is crucial to any other
cognitive function we perform. If infants weren't able
to attend a human voices and filter out birds
chirping or dogs barking, it'd be nearly impossible
to learn to speak. And if we didn't have
some way to refocus on to unattended
information, then we'd never notice if a car was
coming straight for us or if someone yelled fire. So now, hopefully, you have
a little better understanding of the theories that try to
explain this important process.