If you're seeing this message, it means we're having trouble loading external resources on our website.

If you're behind a web filter, please make sure that the domains *.kastatic.org and *.kasandbox.org are unblocked.

Main content

Resistors in series and parallel review

Review how to find the equivalent resistance for resistors in parallel and series configurations. Recall the current and voltage properties of series and parallel configurations of resistors.

Key terms

Term (symbol)Meaning
Equivalent resistance (Req)The total resistance of a configuration of resistors.


EquationSymbol breakdownMeaning in words
Rs=iRiorRs=R1+R2+Rs is equivalent series resistance and iRi is the sum of all individual resistances Ri.Equivalent series resistance is the sum of all the individual resistances.
1Rp=i1Rior1Rp=1R1+1R2+Rp is equivalent parallel resistance and i1Ri is the sum of all individual resistances Ri reciprocals.The reciprocal of the equivalent parallel resistance is the sum of all the individual resistance reciprocals.

Resistors in series and parallel

Series resistor properties

Any time we have more than one resistor in a row, the configuration is described as having the resistors in series or series resistors (Figure 1).
Figure 1. Resistors in series.
Resistors in series have some special characteristics worth remembering. Any configuration of resistors in a series will have the following properties.
  • The same current flows through each resistor: I1=I2==In
  • Potential difference is distributed among series resistors: ΔVs=ΔV1+ΔV2++ΔVn
  • The resistor with the biggest resistance has the greatest voltage.
  • The equivalent resistance Rs is always more than any resistor in the series configuration.

Parallel resistor properties

Another possible way to arrange resistors in a circuit is to have multiple resistors branch off from a single junction in the circuit (Figure 2).
Figure 2. Resistors in parallel.
Resistors in parallel also have some special characteristics:
  • The current is distributed across resistors: I=I1+I2++In
  • Potential difference is the same across all resistors in parallel: ΔV1=ΔV2==ΔVn
  • The smallest resistance gets the most current.
  • The equivalent resistance Rp is always less than any resistor in the parallel configuration.
Keep in mind that not all circuits are strictly series or parallel. Sometimes they can be a combination of both. We will learn how to analyze more complicated circuits in the next few lessons.

How to calculate equivalent resistance

Resistors in series or parallel can be replaced by a single resistor of equivalent resistance. This strategy is helpful for solving complex circuit problems because it let’s us simplify the circuit.

Equivalent series resistance

We can redraw the circuit with the resistors in series replaced by a single equivalent resistor (Figure 3).
Figure 3. Replacing resistors in a series with an equivalent resistor Rs.
We can calculate Rs from the resistances of the individual resistors in series. If R1=4Ω and R2=8Ω, then the equivalent resistance is the sum of R1 and R2:

Equivalent parallel resistance

We can redraw a circuit with all resistors in parallel replaced by a single equivalent resistor (Figure 4).
Figure 4. Replacing a resistors in parallel with an equivalent parallel resistor.
We can calculate Rp from the resistances of the individual resistors in parallel. If R1=4Ω and R2=8Ω, then the equivalent resistance Rp is:
Now, let’s be careful here. Lots of people make a mistake here: 38 is not the equivalent parallel resistance Rp yet, it is the reciprocal. To solve for Rp, we need to take the reciprocal of both sides:

Learn more

For deeper explanations, see our video on series resistors and video on parallel resistors.
To check your understanding and work toward mastering these concepts, check out the exercise on calculating equivalent resistance for series and parallel resistors.

Want to join the conversation?

  • marcimus red style avatar for user sk410
    Why in a circuit with several branches the voltage drop across each of the branches is the same?
    Why doesn't it also split up as the current?
    (7 votes)
    Default Khan Academy avatar avatar for user
    • male robot johnny style avatar for user matthewbocay2

      Here's an analogy that might help you understand:

      Imagine there is a bakery, and it produces 5 slices of bread/min and there's 60g of carbo per slice of bread.
      If you own the production for yourself, you get 5 bread/min, and 60g carbo/bread.
      If you are sharing with 4 other friends and you are dividing the bread evenly, you are getting only 1 bread/min, but still 60g carbo/bread.

      In this analogy,
      the bakery=battery
      You and your friends=//resistors
      Bread production=flow of electrons
      Bread=electrons' charge, measured in C.
      Carbo=energy, measured in J.
      Time is, well, time.
      Therefore carbo/bread=J/C, which is the voltage;
      bread/min=C/s, which is the current.

      Here we can see that the voltage doesn't drop with //resistors, but the current does.

      (This is not a proof, but only a way to understand)
      (29 votes)
  • piceratops tree style avatar for user Alfred Samuel
    It is given that the resistor with the biggest resistance has the greatest voltage. We know that electric current is directly proportional to the potential difference across a circuit. So, this statement now means that the biggest resistance allows the largest amount of current to flow through it. Isn't this fact contradictory to what we have learnt? (Current is inversely proportional to resistance)
    (2 votes)
    Default Khan Academy avatar avatar for user
    • starky ultimate style avatar for user itpc932874
      V=IR can be rearranged to I=V/R therefore while the resistance increases the current decreases. In series, the current is the same throughout the circuit. So, a larger resistor will have a larger voltage drop.

      If I have a larger resistor in parallel with a smaller resistor and they both have the same voltage applied since they are in parallel, which one do you think has more current flowing through?
      (5 votes)
  • piceratops ultimate style avatar for user יהודה כהן
    what if there are 2 resistors in series that are parallel to 1 other resistor?
    (2 votes)
    Default Khan Academy avatar avatar for user
    • leaf green style avatar for user Swapnal
      In these types of cases it is best to simplify parts of the circuit and then find out the net resultant. In your example let each of the resistors individually have a value of resistance R. Then:
      The equivalent resistance of the resistors in series
      Req1= R + R = 2R
      Now as you mentioned, these two in series, are in parallel to one other resistor R.
      Finding Req1 basically gives us that a single resistor of 2R would perform the same function(in this case) as the 2 resistors R in series.

      So we can instead, now consider, a resistor with resistance Req1 to be in parallel combination to a resistor with resistance R. And we know how to do this:
      1/ReqFinal= 1/Req1 + 1/R
      Now, as Req1=2R, we get:
      1/ReqFinal= 1/2R + 1/R = 3/2R
      i.e: ReqFinal=2R/3
      Which is the equivalent resistance of the whole combination!
      You can extend this to more complex circuits as well, simplify parts of it and keep going!
      (3 votes)
  • blobby green style avatar for user roadmap108
    I need help in understanding Series-Parallel circuits, where there are both circuits in series and parallel in one individual circuit.
    (1 vote)
    Default Khan Academy avatar avatar for user
    • blobby green style avatar for user TrUe gRAnt
      It would help to just solve the resistance for the parallels first and then add it to the total resisters.

      for example if you had a 5 ohm resistor in series with parrallel resistors (8 and 8 ohms)
      then you could do the parrallel resistors first and once you get the resistors value (4 ohms)
      you could add it to the 5 ohm resistor (9 ohms)

      Think of parrallel resistors as if they are combined to make one resistor
      (2 votes)