- The periodic table, electron shells, and orbitals
- Shells, subshells, and orbitals
- Introduction to electron configurations
- The Aufbau principle
- Valence electrons
- Electron configurations of ions
- Electron configurations of the 3d transition metals
- Atomic structure and electron configuration
The electrons in an atom are arranged in shells that surround the nucleus, with each successive shell being farther from the nucleus. Electron shells consist of one or more subshells, and subshells consist of one or more atomic orbitals. Electrons in the same subshell have the same energy, while electrons in different shells or subshells have different energies. Created by Sal Khan.
Want to join the conversation?
- What is the difference between Shells, Subshells and Orbitals?It was very hard for me to visualize them in my head.How is the 2p6 orbital closer to the neucleus than the 3s2 orbital?Isn't the s orbital always closer to the neucleus?(36 votes)
- An orbital is a space where a specific pair of electrons can be found. We classified the different Orbital into shells and sub shells to distinguish them more easily. This is also due to the history when they were discovered.
Start with the easy. Imagine shells around the nucleus, that get bigger and bigger. The smallest, nearest to the nucleus is shell number 1. It's the one with the lowest energy. Then comes shell number 2, and so on.
Now let's have a look at each shell in detail. They are decided into several subshells. They are the different kinds of orbital. So in the first shell there is only one subshell, the s orbital. It is called 1s.
In the second shell there are s and p orbitals. But the 2s is of course further away from the nucleus, because it is in the second shell. Them comes the third shell even further away from the nucleus. In the third shell we again find p and s orbitals.
The 2p orbital is closer to the nucleus than the 3s orbital, because it is in the second shell, which is closer to the nucleus than the third shell.(54 votes)
- helium's electronic configuration is 1S^2 but then why it is in P block ????(20 votes)
- It's not really in the 'p' block. It's there because it has properties similar to the 'p' block elements. The periodic table is organized according to properties, not orbitals.(35 votes)
- At1:41Sal says that you could find the electron anywhere. Does that mean that it could be 200 km away from the nucleus (even if with a very small probability) or is there a limit for the distance?(20 votes)
- It's a strange reality where it's possible for a part of me to be 200 km away from me, even if the probabilities are as low as they are.(18 votes)
- If the s sub-shell has only one orbital then what does 1s^2 2s^1 mean?(5 votes)
- What I understood is that the notation basically tells you this:
-the first number is the number of shell;
-the letter is the type of orbital;
-the index means how many electrons the orbital contains.
1s^2 means that there is orbital s with 2 electrons in shell 1 .
2s^1 is s orbital with 1 electon in shell 2.
I'm not very good at explaining, but I hope you got it!(21 votes)
- How are orbitals arranged in an atom?
How can one imagine the structure of a real atom not one which bohr model suggests but an original one observed by solving the wave equation...
how can one* assemble* all four quantum number and get the orbitals, subshells structures?
How do Atomic orbitals overlap among each other inside an atom and between the molecules?
I would be pleased if someone can really help me imagine an atom........thank you in advance.(10 votes)
- Alright, well let's start with the electrons first. Electrons move around in "quantized" energy states. Meaning they exist in a specific energy state, and can be anywhere at any given time in that orbital due to the heisenberg uncertainty principle. Think of "quantized" as the smallest units of energy states a particle can have. In comparison think of a basketball it moves in a very fluid motion as it rolls on the ground, now electrons move in a step wise manner on a "ladder" of quantum energy states. They cannot move in a very fluid motion, because distances are so small at that scale.
So if you were trying to imagine an atom, if you looked at the atom from the outside you would see a fuzzy cloud.
Of course atoms have many electrons so you have various electrons in different energy quanta states orbiting around the nucleus.
The nucleus it self would be extremely small in comparison to the electron cloud.(11 votes)
- If Helium can't combine with other elements, In the composition of sun how does it combine with Hydrogen?(6 votes)
- Usually in chemistry we're concerned with chemical reactions. Reactions where the valence electrons of atoms interact to form new chemicals by breaking and forming chemical bonds. Helium doesn't really react chemically because its valence shell is filled and it is stable in its natural electron configuration.
In the sun we don't really have chemical reactions involving helium, rather nuclear reactions. Nuclear reactions are different from chemical reactions in that chemical reactions only involve the electrons of atoms and do not touch nuclei of atoms where we find protons and neutrons while nuclear reactions involve the nuclei of atoms. Essentially what happens in the sun is that atoms of hydrogen-1 (that is isotopes of hydrogen with a single proton only) collide into each other with such force that they fuse into new atoms. The main nuclear reaction occurring in the sun are series of nuclear reactions called the proton-proton chain (because it begins with the collision of two hydrogen atoms containing a single proton each) which eventually results in helium atoms.
But once helium is formed, it doesn't really combine with hydrogen afterwards in either chemical or nuclear reactions. So in the sun it isn't really a case of helium combining with hydrogen in a reaction sense, rather they are just in close proximity to each other in a mixture.
Hope that helps.(14 votes)
- Why is it said that there are 2 electrons in the least energy 1s shell (won't they repell each other ? ) or is it because the attraction and repulsion balance between the core protons and surrounding electrons is best satisfied by this theory?
but still why just 2... why not 4 or maybe 24(random )??(4 votes)
- The electrons repel each other but they are also attracted toward the nucleus by the positively charged protons.
The reason 2 is the magic number for the innermost shell lies in the laws of quantum mechanics, which are extremely complex and not intuitive at all. The best way to think of it for now is just that each shell has a certain capacity, and the maximum capacity of the innermost shell is 2. Then the next 2 shells hold up to 8 electrons. Then the next can two hold 18, then after that its 32.(7 votes)
- I keep re-watching these videos and looking online but, I do not understand anything when he is explaining shells. Mostly the way periods work. what does 1s1 stand for? then 1s2 1s1? what are these numbers and S identifying?(5 votes)
- The first number tells you the energy level of that orbital, or shell if you want to call it that. 1 is first shell, 2 is second shell etc.
The letter tells you which orbital it is, eg s, p, d or f
The superscript number tells you how many electrons are in that orbital
1s^2 means 2 electrons are in the 1s orbital
1s^2 2s^2 2p^6 means 2 electrons in the 1s orbital, 2 electrons in the 2s orbital. and 6 electrons in the three 2p orbitals(6 votes)
- Why can`t we determine the exact position of the electron?(7 votes)
- because it is microscopic and when it comes to microscopic particles the Newtonian Physics or classical physics fails we can't apply it on microscopic particles because of particle and wave duality. Only on Macroscopic particles we can apply classical physics because it largely shows particle nature and their wave nature can be neglected because they have very less detectable waves. when it comes to microscopic particles we have to consider its wave nature because their waves can't be neglected they have pretty detectable waves(2 votes)
- If the orbitals are perfect spheres, shouldn't the energy of the orbitals reduce as we move further away from the center?
Because the pull from the center is less, hence it would require little energy to balance out the pull.(4 votes)
- Orbitals are not orbits!
Have a look at the chart Sal shows around8:25— do you really think that orbitals are perfect spheres?
Since orbitals are based on the wavelike properties of electrons, your intuition is leading you astray.
If you are interested in this subject, I encourage you to work through the relevant Chemistry and Physics material on KhanAcademy.
(you would probably benefit for watching the entire quantum physics section)(4 votes)
- [Instructor] We've learned in other videos that the atom is in fact made up of even smaller constituent particles which is pretty amazing because atoms are already unimaginably small. And those particles are the protons which have positive charge, you have your neutrons which have neutral charge or no charge and then you have your electrons which have negative charge. Now, the big question physicist and chemists were facing over a hundred years ago is how are these things configure and they realized that the positive charge is concentrated at the center of the atom. In fact, most of the mass which is made up of the protons and the neutrons is concentrated at the center and so the early model for how an atom worked was maybe you have your protons and neutrons in the center so let's say, we're talking about a helium atom. A helium atom has two protons in the nucleus and a typical helium atom would have two neutrons as well so the nucleus might look something like that. And early physicists and chemists said, "All right, well, if the protons have a positive charge, "electrons have a negative charge, "so they'll be attracted to each other." Opposite signs, opposite charges attract. The same charge repels each other. So maybe the electron which has a negative charge orbits around the nucleus the way that a planet would orbit around its star. So, maybe it orbits something like this. So maybe one electron has an orbit that looks something like that, and then another electron, if we were talking about a neutral helium atom will have two electrons and two protons, well maybe, the other one orbits something like this. I'm trying to just draw an elliptic or a circular looking orbit. And so this is the idea that the electrons are in orbits. Now, it turns out that this is not exactly the case. Electrons are not in these well-defined circular or elliptical orbits. In fact, at any given point in time, it's not necessarily exactly right there, it could be there but there's some probability it's here, there's some probability that it's there, there's some probability that it's there's, some probability that it's over there. And so to describe where electrons are likely to be found, physicist and chemists introduced to the idea of an orbital and the best way to think about orbitals is to think about a hydrogen atom and actually the map for orbitals, it's hydrogen as the simplest atom and so the map for orbitals has been best completed for the hydrogen atom. So then a hydrogen atom especially the typical isotope of hydrogen found on Earth, the nucleus actually has no neutrons. You just have a single proton at the center. And if you have a neutral hydrogen atom, that one electron, instead of being in orbit around that one proton like that, we can really just think about the probabilities of where it might be. It could be here, it could be here at any given moment, it could be there at any given moment, it could be off the screen at some moment but it's more likely to be in certain regions of space around the nucleus and others. And we can visualize where it's most likely to be by saying, "All right, it looks like 90% of the time, "it's in a sphere that looks something like that." But once again, it could be here, it could be there, it could be there, could be there, could be there, could be out here, it could be anywhere. We're just saying where it happens to be 90% of the time. That's the visualization. Now, an interesting question is what if you were to give that electron a little bit more energy? Well, what does energy mean? Well, if you think about planets or rocket or satellite orbiting around, if you were to give it a little bit more energy, if you ere to give it a little bit push, it could have a larger orbit, it would look something like that. But quantum mechanics isn't about things happening gradually. Sometimes people think quantum means small or something like that. No, it really means that you're talking about discreet packets. So in quantum physics, quantum chemistry, if you add a certain amount of energy to an electron, instead of having a 90% chance of being found in this first shell, this first energy level, it could then be found, it would then jump into the next energy level or the next shell. And so now, it might be more of, 90% of the time, it's going to be found in this shell right over here. And then if you were to give it the right boost of energy, once again, just a little bit won't do, you have to give it enough so then it jumps into the next energy level, then it might form this weird patterns that looks kinda like dumbbells where 90% of the time, it's kind of you can view it as it's on the orbital that looks kind of like that dumbbell shape. I just did in kind of the horizontal direction. You can have it in a vertical direction. You could also have it on the in-out direction of this page. And if you were wondering where did these shapes come from and if you keep adding more and more energy, you get these more and more exotic shapes for orbitals, think about standing waves. That's my best hint I can give you that the quantum level, actually at all levels, but especially at the quantum level, you see things like electrons have both particle and wave-like properties. Imagine something like a standing wave where if I were to just take a rope and if I were to just shake it, I might get standing waves that look like that. If I were to take a some type of a membrane in two dimensions and if I were to push on one side right here if I were to drum on that, you might get, so this part dips down, and then that part dips up. And so when you get to three dimensions, you end up getting this dumbbell shape when you add more energy and then you get more and more and more exotic shapes, just to imagine what some of the first orbitals look like rendered by a computer, you see it right over here. So if you have your lowest energy electron, you are in what is called an S-orbital right over here and this one we would call 1s 'cause it is at the first shell, the one closest to the nucleus. If you give even more energy, then that electron might jump into the second energy level or the second shell and the orbital in that second shell which would be the default if it's the lowest energy in the second shell would be the 2s orbital. Once again, you have this spherical orbital, it's just a little, it's more likely to be found further out than the one, it was just in the one shell. Once again, if you add even more energy, you'll fall, you'll still be in the second shell but you will be into one of these orbitals that have higher energies so you could view this as the 2p orbital that is in the x-dimension. This could be the 2p orbital that is in the y-dimension as some people call that 2px. Some people would call that 2py. This you could view as the in and out of the page so you could view that as the z-dimension. So that is 2pz and the orbitals keep going. There is a d-orbital once you get to the third shell. Once you get to the fourth shell, there is an f-orbital. All we've talked about right now is an hydrogen. If you keep giving more energy to that one electron, what happens to it? What is the shape of the probabilities of where it might be into two-dimensional space? As you can imagine, if you have two electrons, it's not exactly the same but this is pretty good approximation. You can actually put two electrons in this 1s orbital but after that, you can imagine the electrons are repelling each other. So another electron doesn't wanna go there so the third electron that you add is going to end up in the 2s orbital. It's gonna be at that higher energy level and then that can fit two. So you can fit up to four electrons between the 1s and the 2s. And then the fifth one is going to have to go into one of these p-orbitals. Now, one last point, just to make sure you understand the terminology of orbitals and shells. So first of all, you have this idea of shells and sometimes the word shell will be used interchangeably with energy level, energy levels. And so in this diagram or this a visualization right over here, I've depicted the one shell and then I've also depicted the two shells. So this is a shell right over here. This is another shell. Now, you'll also hear the term, subshell, subshell, or sometimes people will say sublevels and that's where they're talking about s or p or d and eventually f so if I circle this, I'm talking about that first shell. Now, the first shell only contains one subshell and that's the 1s subshell and the 1s subshell only has one orbital. Once again, the 1s orbital. So for the first shell, the shell, the subshell, the orbital is all referring to the same thing, but as we get to the second shell, it's a little bit different. If we're talking about the subshells, in the second shell, there's s and p so this is a subshell, and then this is another subshell right over here. There's actually three orbitals in the p-subshell. So I'll leave you there. In the next video, we'll actually look at various atoms and think about their electron configurations. Where do their electrons sit? In which of these shells, subshells, and orbitals?