Main content

### Course: Multivariable calculus > Unit 2

Lesson 8: Differentiating vector-valued functions (articles)# Curvature

How do you measure how much a curve actually, you know, curves?

## Background

## What we're building to

- The radius of curvature at a point on a curve is, loosely speaking, the radius of a circle which fits the curve most snugly at that point.
- The
**curvature**, denoted , is one divided by the radius of curvature.$\kappa $ - In formulas, curvature is defined as the magnitude of the derivative of a unit tangent vector function with respect to arc length:Don't worry, I'll talk about each step of computing this value.
- The intuition here is that the unit tangent vector tells you which direction you are moving, and the rate at which it changes with respect to small steps
along the curve is a good indication of how quickly you are turning.$ds$

## Driving along a curve

Picture some curve in the $xy$ -plane. We'll treat everything with formulas in a bit, but for now, just think of the picture:

Imagine driving a car along this curve, and think of how much you would be turning the steering wheel at each point. At some points, the road hardly curves, and you are practically driving straight. At others, you have to turn the wheel quite a bit.

Now imagine that at some time while you drive, your steering wheel locks. If you were to keep driving with this locked steering wheel, not at all minding the fact that you're going off the road, your car would trace out some circle, like the one drawn in green below:

If the steering wheel was turned a lot when it froze, that circle would have a relatively small radius. If you were hardly turning at all, the circle would have a very large radius. The following animation shows what those various circles (drawn in green) might look like at different points on the curve. The radius of each circle is drawn in red.

We call the radius of the circle associated with each point the

**radius of curvature**at that point. It's a good way to measure how much a curve actually, you know,*curves*at each point. Another way to think about these circles is that they hug the curve more closely than any other circle would.Another important term is $\kappa $ symbol:

**curvature**, which is just one divided by the radius of curvature. It's typically denoted with the funky-looking little**Concept check**: When a curve is very close to being a straight line, the curvature would be

## Computing curvature

Suppose you have the function which defines a curve in the $xy$ -plane. For example, the curve I used in the previous section is defined by the following vector-valued function:

This is the same thing as saying it is defined by the following parametric equations:

Computing curvature involves two broad steps:

#### Step 1: Find a unit tangent vector

A "unit tangent vector" to the curve at a point is, unsurprisingly, a tangent vector with length $1$ . In the context of a parametric curve defined by $\overrightarrow{\mathbf{\text{s}}}(t)$ , "finding a unit tangent vector" almost always means finding $T(t)$ , which takes in the same parameter and spits out a unit vector which is tangent to the curve at the point $\overrightarrow{\mathbf{\text{s}}}(t)$ .

*all*unit tangent vectors. That is to say, defining a vector-valued function#### Step 2: Find $\frac{dT}{ds}$

As you travel along the curve according to $\overrightarrow{\mathbf{\text{s}}}(t)$ , the unit vector changes direction whenever you turn. At sharp turns, it changes a lot, on relatively straight portions, it hardly changes at all. In fact, the curvature $\kappa $ is

*defined*to be the derivative of the unit tangent vector function.However, it is not the derivative with respect to the parameter $t$ , since that could depend on how quickly you are moving along the curve. It is the derivative with respect to tiny changes in $s$ .

*arc length*, usually represented by the letterTypically, the way to compute this is by first taking the derivative of $T$ with respect to $t$ , then dividing it by $||{\displaystyle \frac{d\overrightarrow{\mathbf{\text{s}}}}{dt}}||$ .

## Finding the unit tangent vector

Let's take a look at the function we had above:

If you read the article on differentiating vector-valued functions, you will know that the derivative of this function can be thought of as a velocity vector.

For example, if we evaluate the derivative we just calculated at a specific time, perhaps $t=\pi $ , here's the vector we get:

Positioning this vector so that its tail sits on the point $\overrightarrow{\mathbf{\text{s}}}(\pi )$ , where the particle is at time $t=\pi $ , it represents the velocity of the particle at that time.

However, we must tweak this function, since we want $2$ , and $2\ne {1}^{{\text{[citation needed]}}}$ .

*unit*tangent vectors. For example, this particular tangent vector has length**Concept check**: Given the formula I just showed for

what is the magnitude of this vector (as a function of time)?

**Concept check**: What is the unit vector pointing in the same direction as

**Key question**:Which of the following represents the unit tangent vector of a curve parameterized by

## Getting curvature from the unit tangent vector

Now we have an expression for the unit tangent vector as a function of time, which I'll denote with a capital $T$ for tangent, (not to be confused with lower-case $t$ for the parameter):

The curvature $\kappa $ is the magnitude of the derivative of this unit tangent vector, but with respect to arc length $s$ , not the parameter $t$ .

Nevertheless, the typical way to compute this is to first differentiate $T$ with respect to $t$ , then to divide by the magnitude $||{\overrightarrow{\mathbf{\text{s}}}}^{\prime}(t)||$ , which you can think of as $\frac{ds}{dt}$ .

## Intuition

Let's pause for a moment to get an intuition for this. The derivative of $T(t)$ tells us how the unit tangent vector changes over time. Since it's always a

*unit*tangent vector, it never changes length, and only changes direction.At a particular time ${t}_{0}$ , you can think of the vector $\frac{dT}{dt}}({t}_{0})$ as sitting at the tip of the vector $T({t}_{0})$ . Imagine the derivative vector trying to pull the vector $T({t}_{0})$ one way or another, telling it, "Hey! Come point more in this direction."

Since the length of $T({t}_{0})$ never changes, this derivative vector must always be perpendicular to $T({t}_{0})$ ; otherwise. it would "pull" it longer or shorter.

When this derivative vector is long, it's pulling the unit tangent vector

*really*hard to change direction. As a result, the curve will change direction more suddenly, meaning it will have a smaller radius of curvature, and hence a very large curvature. Conversely, if the derivative vector is short, it's only half-heartedly pulling on the tangent vector. This translates to a very gentle turn, and hence a large radius of curvature, meaning a small curvature.However, we don't want differences in the rate at which we move along the curve to influence the value of curvature since it is a statement about the geometry of the curve itself and not the time-dependent trajectory of whatever particle happens to be traversing it. For this reason, curvature requires differentiating $T$ with respect to arc length, $s$ , instead of the parameter $t$ .

## Example: Curvature of a helix

There's nothing specific about two-dimensions in everything we've just done. For example, let's find the curvature of the following three-dimensional function:

The animation below shows the shape of this curve, which is known as a

**helix**. It also indicates the radius of curvature at each point by showing the circle (drawn in green) which most closely "hugs" the curve at each point, with the radius of each circle drawn in red.Ah yes, I call this one "vector-calculus hula hoop dance."

One thing you might notice is that the size of these circles doesn't seem to change. This is far from true for most three-dimensional curves, making our example somewhat special.

**Concept check**: By seeing that the circles above don't change size, what do you expect to be true of our curvature function

If you would like to get some practice with this type of problem, now is the time you should pull out a pencil and paper. We'll go through it together, you and I, but I'll give you the chance to try each step for yourself before the answer is shown.

#### Step 1: Compute derivative

The first step to finding curvature is to take the derivative of our function,

This will give us a tangent vector to the curve which we can then mold into a unit tangent vector. Compute this derivative.

#### Step 2: Normalize the derivative

To get a

**unit**tangent vector we have to normalize this derivative vector, which is to say, divide it by Its magnitude. What is the magnitude of this derivative?Thankfully this is a constant. Things are a real pain when it's not. Using the previous two answers, what is our unit tangent vector $T(t)$ as a function of time?

#### Step 3: Take the derivative of the unit tangent

To get curvature, we must find the derivative of this function, with respect to time, then take its magnitude. What is the derivative of $T(t)$ in this case?

#### Step 4: Find the magnitude of this value

What is the magnitude of this vector?

#### Step 5: Divide this value by $||{\overrightarrow{\mathbf{\text{v}}}}^{\prime}(t)||$

To go from $\frac{dT}{dt}$ to $\frac{dT}{ds}$ , we must divide this by the magnitude of the derivative of the original parametric function.

Notice, this is a constant, so the curvature is the same at all points on the curve.

## Summary

- The radius of curvature at a point on a curve is, loosely speaking, the radius of a circle which fits the curve most snugly at that point.
- The
**curvature**, denoted , is one divided by the radius of curvature.$\kappa $ - To find the curvature given the parametric function
defining a curve:$\overrightarrow{\mathbf{\text{s}}}$ - Find the unit tangent vector by normalizing the derivative of
:$\overrightarrow{\mathbf{\text{s}}}$

- Curvature is defined as the magnitude of the derivative of this value with respect to arc length
. You can compute that as follows:$s$

- The intuition here is that the unit tangent vector tells you which direction you are moving, and the rate at which it changes with respect to small steps
along the curve is a good indication of how quickly you are turning.$ds$

## Want to join the conversation?

- Why is the tag [citation needed] labelled after 2 /= 1? Are portions of this article copied off Wikipedia?(0 votes)
- It's a sarcastic tag to poke fun at wikipedia wanting to site EVERYTHING, including the fact that 2 isn't 1. xkcd likes to poke fun at this.(41 votes)

- How would you work out curvature for a parametric surface? I can picture out a sphere that fits the parametric surface most snugly about a point, but I don't know how to compute it using multivariable calculus.(4 votes)
- Actually for a surface, curvature would depend on the direction of the cross-section you take at the point, and in general, if I recall correctly, there are, under certain smoothness conditions, always two particularly interresting directions to consider, one which gives a maximal curvature, and one which gives a minimal curvature, and sometimes these are equal (as is the case for a sphere or a plane).

I'm being a little loose with the details, but if you want to learn more, your question is one which is addressed formally in the branch of math sometimes called "differential geometry." If it sounds interesting to you, and I suspect it might if you've read this far, then I suggest finding a course on YouTube to hold you over until KA adds more advanced math sections. Hope that helps!(8 votes)

- So we first differentiate the velocity vector, and then normalize it. This becomes the unit tangent vector. Finally, we differentiate the unit tangent vector to produce curvature. Is this correct?(2 votes)
- No. We do not differentiate the velocity vector. We differentiate the position vector, in order to get the velocity vector, and normalize that. That is the unit tangent vector.(10 votes)

- This may be a stupid question, but where is the connection between the "closest circle"-thing and the actual formula of curvature? Because it seems to work pretty well, but I don't see why(5 votes)
- no it's not a stupid question:), you can prove the formula of the curvature by assuming a circle which touch the curve at some point (x,y) and then set its first and second derivatives to be equal to the first and second derivatives of the curve at that point(x,y) and then you will get a system of three equations solve for the coordinates of the center of the circle as a function of x,x',x",y,y',y" and then solve for the radius and to know the curvature take the reciprocal of the radius and then you are done.(3 votes)

- How would the derivative of the unit tangent vector always be perpendicular to the unit tangent vector? This doesn't make sense to me, as in my thinking a perpendicular/90 degree angle would create a right triangle in which the new unit vector produced would be the hypotenuse, which would be longer than the previous unit tangent vector.

Wouldn't the angle of the vector (produced by the derivative of the unit tangent vector) be at an angle to the unit tangent vector that depended on the magnitude of the vector produced by the derivative of the unit tangent vector as to create an isosceles triangle where the two equal side are the previous unit tangent vector and the new unit tangent vector?(3 votes)- there is a math way to demonstrate that: if you take the derivative of the dot product

T·T=1;

d/dt(T·T)=d/dt(1);

d/dt(T)·T+T·d/dt(T)=0;

2 d/dt(T)·T=0

then the only way that the dot product is zero is that the two vector are normal to each other.(3 votes)

- I have curvature defined in radians/m. What is equivalent in 1/m? Will it be the same?(2 votes)
- Considering radians is unitless, you can just change the unit and the answer will remain the same.(2 votes)

- Can we write that the curvature of the function v(t) is equal to |v''(t)|/(|v'(t)|^2) ?(2 votes)
- No, the derivative of the tangent unit vector is the derivative of product of two function an scalar function and a vector function.

d/dt(T) = d/dt(v'*1/(ds/dt))

= (1/(ds/dt))*d/dt(v') + v'(t)*d/dt(1/(ds/dt))(1 vote)

- Isn't it true that curvature k = 1/|v|*|dT/dt| and not just |dT/dt|?(2 votes)
- Express the points (vectors) on the circumference of a circle with radius r as a function of the distance (s) we travel along the circumference (starting at (r,0)) to reach the point.

C(s) = r (cos(s/r) , sin(s/r)), with 0 <= s < 2pi r

Then T(s) = C'(s) = (-sin(s/r) , cos(s/r)) and T'(s) = - (1/r) (cos(s/r) , sin(s/r))

k(s) = 1/r

We want to measure the deflection of the unit tangent per unit of distance along the circumference; not the deflection per radian. To do this we, we need to use the parameter s which measures distance along the circumference which must be scaled by 1/r (so that 2pi r of distance equals one cycle around the circle, 0 to 2pi radians) to get the correct answer. The change in radians depends on the change in distance along the circumference. t = s/r and dt = ds/r. The equations above result from this substitution.(1 vote)

- Maybe not exactly about this topic, how can I get the parametric equations itself, to find its curvature next, if I have some graphed curve ?(2 votes)
- For the answer to part 2, how did we arrive at an answer for dv/dt? I don't know where the 5 came from/why T(t) seems to just be the reciprocal of ||dv/dt||.(2 votes)