Main content
Europe 1300 - 1800
Course: Europe 1300 - 1800 > Unit 9
Lesson 3: Flanders- Peter Paul Rubens, Mulay Ahmad
- Peter Paul Rubens, Elevation of the Cross
- Rubens, Elevation of the Cross
- Rubens, The Rape of the Daughters of Leucippus
- Rubens, The Presentation of the Portrait of Marie de' Medici
- Rubens, The Presentation of the Portrait of Marie de' Medici
- Rubens, Arrival (or Disembarkation) of Marie de Medici at Marseilles, Medici Cycle
- Peter Paul Rubens, The Apotheosis of Henry IV and the Proclamation of the Regency of Marie de’ Médici
- Rubens, Venus, Mars and Cupid
- Rubens, the Consequences of War
- Rubens, Rubens and Isabella Brant in the Honeysuckle Bower
- Anthony van Dyck, Charles I at the Hunt
- Anthony van Dyck, Samson and Delilah
- Baroque art in Flanders
© 2023 Khan AcademyTerms of usePrivacy PolicyCookie Notice
Anthony van Dyck, Charles I at the Hunt
Anthony van Dyck, Charles I at the Hunt, c. 1635, oil on canvas, 2.66 x 2.07 m (Musée du Louvre), inscribed: "Carolus.I.REX Magnae Britanniae" - Charles I rules Great Britain
Speakers: Dr. Beth Harris and Dr. Steven Zucker . Created by Beth Harris and Steven Zucker.
Speakers: Dr. Beth Harris and Dr. Steven Zucker . Created by Beth Harris and Steven Zucker.
Want to join the conversation?
- Why does it look like there's a crease across the middle of the painting?(4 votes)
- I think this is actually a seam. It is fairly common to find seams on large canvases and likely that it was less visible when the painting was new.(7 votes)
- At, the horse in the painting has a head that looks awfully small. Awkwardly so. Is that a mistake? Is that intentional? 3:21(2 votes)
- I wonder if it might be that the breeds of horses could be different. The horse in "Charles I at the Hunt" has the thick mane, coat color, and noble head associated with the Andalusian. The small-headed horse in Charles I on Horseback could be a barb. The standard for the barb, which originated in North Africa, is a "well-set, distinctively refined head." Barbs and Arabians contributed to the development of the Thoroughbred. Both the Andalusian and the barb were known in England, although the barb was sometimes confused with the Arabian.
I think van Dyck was too good of a painter for that small head to be a mistake.(3 votes)
- I realize this is a portraiture, but it seems like Van Dyck is leaving the Baroque tradition of movement, activity, and in-your-face presence typical of other painters of this time. It seems that with the exception of the elbow jutting out at us, the rest of the scene is flat, still, and composed, nearly Renaissance-like.
I don't know enough (yet) about Van Dyck to know his style yet, but was he leaving the typical Baroquian style behind?(2 votes) - is van dyck the guy after whom the beard is named?(2 votes)
- I don't believe in child prodigies. People become proficient thought constant practice. Also people in centuries past did not have the internet, or other elements of modern life to distract them from their practice. It is amazing how much work can get done without distraction.(1 vote)
- Is Charles the first and his wife Maria related to queen Elizabeth the first?(1 vote)
- No, both Charles and Maria belong to the House of Stuart, Elizabeth was from the House of Tudor. As an interesting tidbit, Elizabeth had Charles mother (Mary, Queen of Scots) executed.(1 vote)
- What was the Tudor Monarchy(1 vote)
- The most famous Tudor was King Henry VIII. Learn more here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/House_of_Tudor(1 vote)
Video transcript
(piano music playing) Steven: We're in The Louvre
in Paris and we're looking at a large, vertical portrait of
Charles I, King of England. Beth: Charles I was
self-conscious about being short, but he seems anything but short here. Steven: He's towering over the landscape. Beth: Well, we really look up at him. Steven: In fact, his head
is seen against the sky just below the high boughs of that tree, but the artist has very
cleverly framed his face by his hat, so that the face isn't lost against the brightness of the sky. Beth: And his clothing is
fabulous, the satin top, turned down leather boots. Steven: Well, he's incredibly fashionable. Throughout this entire painting, there is a sense of studied
elegant nonchalance. Beth: It almost seems like he's even above posing as king. Here, he
is shown during the hunt. He's come down from his horse. His horse is being taken
care of by the groom. There's a page in the
background who seems to be holding his hunting
jacket. He's stepped out to face the horizon, but
he turns to look out at us. Steven: Well, it seems
as if he's on his way but he's taking only
the most cursory glance, not even acknowledging us, just "Ah yes, of course you are there." (Steven and Beth snickering) Beth: It's true and he
was known for having this issue with authority, one could say. Steven: Well, he felt that
he was the absolute authority an absolute monarch whose
right to rule came from God. Beth: And during his
reign, there was several conflicts with parliament,
who tried to check his power. Steven: And there were
further problems because he was seen to be too "high church". Beth: Right. He married a
Catholic and he had very strict ideas about worship
that got in the way of the Puritans and the Calvinists. Steven: And there were
other issues that had to do with the expenditure of money because of wars on the continent. Beth: So eventually,
things came to a head with parliament, two civil wars. Ultimately, he was arrested,
tried, found guilty and beheaded in London. Steven: And England was briefly ruled by Oliver Cromwell, who was on the opposing parliamentary side as a republic, but it's interesting to
note that that brief period was followed by the
restoration of the monarchy and Charles' son, Charles
II, would then rule England. Beth: What we're looking
at though is this prototype of the ideal aristocratic
portrait that we see in England for another almost 200 years. Steven: Well this has enormous impact, especially on 18th century painters like Gainsborough and Reynolds
and it's important when we look at this
painting, since we know the subsequent history
of the beheading etc., to understand that this
painting was made well before. This king is so clearly
confident of his power. Beth: Van Dyck was a child prodigy. Before the age of 20,
he was a master in the Painter's Guild, the Guild
of St. Luke at Antwerp. He was the head assistant
in Ruben's studio. Van Dyck became famous
for painting portraits, although he also painted religious images. Steven: And Van Dyck, like
his great teacher Rubens, had a large studio with
lots of assistants, so that he could turn out those portraits. Beth: Van Dyck was clearly
influenced by Tission, by later by Baroque painters. I'm thinking of Baroque
art, especially with that elbow, that juts out into our space. Steven: He's come off his
horse. This is in a sense an equestrian portrait, but dismounted. Beth: And if you think
about equestrian portraits, their history goes back to
the ancient Roman emperors and there is an image by
Van Dyck of Charles I on a horse, is a symbol of
power but to show the king still powerful even off the horse is quite an achievement. Steven: He doesn't need
any of the trappings. He doesn't need the crown.
He doesn't need the sceptor. He doesn't need to be
mounted on the horse. He alone even in this
informal hunting costume is enough to express his
complete control of the State. Beth: And he was smart
enough to hire Van Dyck. Van Dyck had an official role in the court of Charles I, so Charles
clearly also saw art as a way of proclaiming
his powers of kind of propaganda for his rule. Steven: There is a corollary
between the pose of the king as we see it here and
the artist's ability to make painting look easy. Van Dyck has an ability
to run his paintbrush across the surface of the canvas, delineating forms with the kind of ease that makes it look certain and it is a perfect coupling with the self-assurance of the king. (piano music playing)