Main content
AP®︎/College Art History
Course: AP®︎/College Art History > Unit 9
Lesson 1: West Asia- Petra: The rose red city of the Nabataeans
- Petra: Rock-cut façades
- Petra: urban metropolis
- Petra: UNESCO Siq Project
- The Kaaba
- The Dome of the Rock (Qubbat al-Sakhra)
- The Great Mosque (or Masjid-e Jameh) of Isfahan
- Folio from a Qur'an
- Basin (Baptistère de Saint Louis)
- Bahram Gur Fights the Karg (Horned Wolf)
- Introduction to the court carpets of the Ottoman, Safavid, and Mughal empires
- The Court of Gayumars
- Paradise in miniature, The Court of Kayumars — part 1
- Paradise in miniature, The Court of Kayumars — part 2
- The Ardabil Carpet
© 2023 Khan AcademyTerms of usePrivacy PolicyCookie Notice
Petra: Rock-cut façades
By Dr. Elizabeth Macaulay-Lewis
The rock-cut façades are the iconic monuments of Petra. Of these, the most famous is the so-called Treasury (or Khazneh), which appeared in the film Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade, as the final resting place of the Holy Grail.
The prominence of the tombs in the landscape led many early explorers and scholars to see Petra as a large necropolis (cemetery); however, archaeology has shown that Petra was a well-developed metropolis with all of the trappings of a Hellenistic city.
Tombs
The tomb façades draw upon a rich array of Hellenistic and Near Eastern architecture and, in this sense, their architecture reflects the diverse and different cultures with which the Nabataeans traded, interacted, and even intermarried (King Aretas IV’s daughter was married to Herod Antipas, the son of Herod the Great, whose mother was also Nabataean). Many of the tombs contain niches or small chambers for burials, cut into the stone walls. No human remains have ever been found in any of the tombs, and the exact funerary practices of the Nabataeans remain unknown.
The dating of the tombs has proved difficult as there are almost no finds, such as coins and pottery, that enable archaeologists to date these tombs; a few inscriptions allow us to date some of the tombs at Petra, although at Egra, another Nabataean site (in modern Saudi Arabia), there are thirty-one dated tombs. Today scholars believe that the tombs were probably constructed when the Nabataeans were wealthiest between the second century B.C.E. and the early second century C.E. Archaeologists and art historians have identified a number styles for the tomb façades, but they all co-existed and cannot be used date the tombs. The few surviving inscriptions in Nabataean, Greek, and Latin tell us about the people who were buried in the tombs.
Hellenistic in style
The Treasury’s façade (24.9 meters wide x 38.77 meters high) most clearly embodies the Hellenistic style and reflects the influence of Alexandria, the greatest city in the Eastern Mediterranean at this time. Its architecture features a broken and central on the upper level; this architectural composition originated in Alexandria. Ornate Corinthian columns are used throughout. Above the broken pediments, the bases of two appear and stretch upwards into the rock.
The sculptural decoration also underscores a connection to the Hellenistic world. On the upper level, Amazons (bare-breasted) and Victories stand, flanking a central female figure (on the tholos), who is probably Isis-Tyche, a combination of the Egyptian goddess, Isis, and Tyche, the Greek goddess of good fortune. The lower level features the Greek twin gods, Castor and Pollux, the Dioscuri, who protected travelers and the dead on their journeys. There are other details from the artistic traditions of the Hellenistic world, including eagles, the symbols of royal Ptolemies, vines, vegetation, , and . However, the tomb also features rosettes, a design originally associated with the .
There are no inscriptions or ceramic evidence associated with the tomb that allows us to date it. Considering that it was located at the most important entrance to Petra through the , it was probably a tomb for one of the Nabataean Kings. is the most likely candidate, because he was the Nabataeans’ most successful ruler, and many buildings were erected in Petra during his reign.
The treasury was exceptional for its figurative detail and ornate Hellenistic architectural orders; most tombs did not have figurative sculpture—a legacy of the Nabataean artistic tradition that was largely aniconic, or non-figurative. Many of the smaller tombs were less complex and also drew far less upon the artistic conventions of the Hellenistic world, suggesting that the Nabataeans combined the artistic traditions of the East and in many different and unique ways.
It is a popular misconception that all of the rock-cut monuments, which number over 3,000, were all tombs. In fact, many of the other rock-cut monuments were living quarters or monumental dining rooms with interior benches. Of these, the Monastery (also known as ed-Deir) is most the famous. Even the large theater, constructed in the first century B.C.E., was cut into the rock of Petra.
Much like the Treasury (discussed above), ed-Deir was not a monastery, but rather behind its façade was a monumental with a large area for dining with a cultic podium at the back. While no traces of decoration remain today, the room would have been plastered and painted. The façade again features a broken pediment around a central tholos, but its decoration is more abstract and less figurative than that of the Treasury. The column capitals are typically Nabataean, modeled on the Corinthian order, but abstracted. The façade features a Doric , but rather than having figures in the metopes, roundels with no decoration appear. Thus, while the Monastery deploys many elements of Classical architecture, it does so in a unique way.
Essay by Dr. Elizabeth Macaulay-Lewis
Want to join the conversation?
- If the following is correct...then how can we be certain that these "tombs" were tombs at all?
"Many of the tombs contain niches or small chambers for burials, cut into the stone walls. No human remains have ever been found in any of the tombs, and the exact funerary practices of the Nabataeans remain unknown."(12 votes)- The article also says, "The few surviving inscriptions in Nabataean, Greek, and Latin tell us about the people who were buried in the tombs." It would be silly to write about dead people in a certain place if there were no dead people there!
(Or perhaps the Nabateans were really clever pranksters who wanted to torment future archaeologists...) >:-)(5 votes)
- Wish there were more complete pictures of the Khazneh.(5 votes)
- Added more today! Also search Flickr - there are great images of Petra there.(5 votes)
- I could see it being difficult to carve buildings of sandstone without it collapsing from wind and water erosion as well as instability of open space.
I could see sandstone buildings eventually over thousands of years turning into sand that is like the sand of the desert surrounding it.
So how did the people of Petra counteract these natural forces of wind and water erosion and instability when they carved this sandstone into buildings?(4 votes)- Petra was completed after about 500 years of construction. It took a long time to perfect it. And the mountains and cliffs that surround the city protect it from most of the extreme weather. And they had very effective canals that protected them from flooding.(1 vote)
- Another gentle correction:
In the third paragraph under Hellenistic in Style, where it says "...the Monastery (also known as ed-Deir) is most the famous," it should say "...is THE MOST famous." Thanks again.(4 votes) - In the second to the last paragraph, it says "[...]the Monastery (also known as ed-Deir) is *the most famous." But the next sentence says "Much like the Treasury (above), ed-Deir was not a monastery..." Was ed-Deir a monastery or not?(2 votes)
- From the author:This is rather subtle but note the capitalization. Its called, The Monastery but that was not its function.(4 votes)
- I don't really know if it's a dumb question but I'm going to ask it anyway. Are there any images with how does it look on the inside? :D(2 votes)
- Try searching for petra jordan interior and then go for images. Here's one I found
http://ericg.photoshelter.com/image/I0000snoMQ5TXiPs(1 vote)
- WHere iS thE OTHEr FacTs(2 votes)
- How long did it take for them to build it(0 votes)
- The NOVA documentary "PETRA: LOST CITY OF STONE" addresses the problems of estimating construction time for these rock-cut monuments: http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/ancient/building-wonders.html#petra-lost-city(4 votes)