If you're seeing this message, it means we're having trouble loading external resources on our website.

If you're behind a web filter, please make sure that the domains *.kastatic.org and *.kasandbox.org are unblocked.

Main content

The Lindisfarne Gospels

By Louisa Woodville
A medieval monk takes up a quill pen, fashioned from a goose feather, and dips it into a rich, black ink made from soot. Seated on a wooden chair in the scriptorium of Lindisfarne, an island off the coast of Northumberland in England, he stares hard at the words from a manuscript made in Italy. This book is his exemplar, the codex (a bound book, made from sheets of paper or parchment) from which he is to copy the Gospels of Matthew, Mark, Luke and John.
Lindisfarne Gospels, St. Matthew (detail), Second Initial Page, f.29, early 8th century (British Library)
Lindisfarne Gospels, St. Matthew (detail), Second Initial Page, f.29, early 8th century (British Library)
For about the next six years, he will copy this Latin. He will illuminate the gospel text with a weave of fantastic images— snakes that twist themselves into knots or birds, their curvaceous and overlapping forms creating the illusion of a third dimension into which a viewer can lose him or herself in meditative contemplation.
Lindisfarne Gospels, John cross-carpet page f 210v (British Museum)
Lindisfarne Gospels, John cross-carpet page f 210v (British Museum)
The book is a spectacular example of Insular or Hiberno-Saxon art—works produced in the British Isles between 500–900 C.E., a time of devastating invasions and political upheavals. Monks read from it during rituals at their Lindisfarne Priory on Holy Island, a Christian community that safeguarded the shrine of St Cuthbert, a bishop who died in 687 and whose relics were thought to have curative and miracle-working powers.
A Northumbrian monk, very likely the bishop Eadfrith, illuminated the codex in the early 8th century. Two-hundred and fifty-nine written and recorded leaves include full-page portraits of each evangelist; highly ornamental “cross-carpet” pages, each of which features a large cross set against a background of ordered and yet teeming ornamentation; and the Gospels themselves, each introduced by an historiated initial. The codex also includes sixteen pages of canon tables set in arcades. Here correlating passages from each evangelist are set side-by-side, enabling a reader to compare narrations.
In 635 C.E. Christian monks from the Scottish island of Iona built a priory in Lindisfarne. More than a hundred and fifty years later, in 793, Vikings from the north attacked and pillaged the monastery, but survivors managed to transport the Gospels safely to Durham, a town on the Northumbrian coast about 75 miles west of its original location.
We glean this information from the manuscript itself, thanks to Aldred, a 10th-century priest from a priory at Durham. Aldred’s colophon—an inscription that relays information about the book’s production—informs us that Eadfrith, a bishop of Lindisfarne in 698 who died in 721, created the manuscript to honor God and St. Cuthbert. Aldred also inscribed a vernacular translation between the lines of the Latin text, creating the earliest known Gospels written in a form of English.
Lindisfarne Gospels, St Matthew, Cross-Carpet page, f.26v  (British Museum)
Lindisfarne Gospels, St Matthew, Cross-Carpet page, f.26v  (British Museum)
Matthew’s cross-carpet page exemplifies Eadfrith’s exuberance and genius. A mesmerizing series of repetitive knots and spirals is dominated by a centrally located cross. One can imagine devout monks losing themselves in the swirls and eddies of color during meditative contemplation of its patterns.
Compositionally, Eadfrith stacked wine-glass shapes horizontally and vertically against his intricate weave of knots. On closer inspection many of these knots reveal themselves as snake-like creatures curling in and around tubular forms, mouths clamping down on their bodies. Chameleon-like, their bodies change colors: sapphire blue here, verdigris green there, and sandy gold in between. The sanctity of the cross, outlined in red with arms outstretched and pressing against the page edges, stabilizes the background’s gyrating activity and turns the repetitive energy into a meditative force.
Lindisfarne Gospels, St Luke, incipit page, f.139 (British Library)
Lindisfarne Gospels, St Luke, incipit page, f.139 (British Library)
Likewise, Luke’s incipit (incipit: it begins) page teems with animal life, spiraled forms, and swirling vortexes. In many cases Eadfrith’s characteristic knots reveal themselves as snakes that move stealthily along the confines of a letter’s boundaries.
Blue pin-wheeled shapes rotate in repetitive circles, caught in the vortex of a large Q that forms Luke’s opening sentence—Quoniam quidem multi conati sunt ordinare narrationem. (Translation: As many have taken it in hand to set forth in order.)
Lindisfarne Gospels, St Luke, incipit page, f.139 (British Library)
Lindisfarne Gospels, St Luke, incipit page, f.139 (British Library)
Birds also abound. One knot enclosed in a tall rectangle on the far right unravels into a blue heron’s chest shaped like a large comma. Eadfrith repeats this shape vertically down the column, cleverly twisting the comma into a cat’s forepaw at the bottom. The feline, who has just consumed the eight birds that stretch vertically up from its head, presses off this appendage acrobatically to turn its body 90 degrees; it ends up staring at the words RENARRATIONEM (part of the phrase -re narrationem).
Eadfrith also has added a host of tiny red dots that envelop words, except when they don’t—the letters “NIAM” of “quoniam” are composed of the vellum itself, the negative space now asserting itself as four letters.
Lindesfarne Gospels, St. Luke, portrait page (137v) (British Museum)
Lindesfarne Gospels, St. Luke, portrait page (137v) (British Museum)
Luke’s incipit page is in marked contrast to his straightforward portrait page. Here Eadfrith seats the curly-haired, bearded evangelist on a red-cushioned stool against an unornamented background. Luke holds a quill in his right hand, poised to write words on a scroll unfurling from his lap. His feet hover above a tray supported by red legs. He wears a purple robe streaked with red, one that we can easily imagine on a late fourth or fifth century Roman philosopher. The gold halo behind Luke’s head indicates his divinity. Above his halo flies a blue-winged calf, its two eyes turned toward the viewer with its body in profile. The bovine clasps a green parallelogram between two forelegs, a reference to the Gospel.
According to the historian Bede from the nearby monastery in Monkwearmouth (d. 735), this calf, or ox, symbolizes Christ’s sacrifice on the cross. Bede assigns symbols for the other three evangelists as well, which Eadfrith duly includes in their respective portraits: Matthew’s is a man, suggesting the human aspect of Christ; Mark’s the lion, symbolizing the triumphant and divine Christ of the Resurrection; and John’s the eagle, referring to Christ’s second coming.
Lindisfarne Gospels, John’s cross-carpet page, folio 210v. (British Library)
Lindisfarne Gospels, John’s cross-carpet page, folio 210v. (British Library)
A dense interplay of stacked birds teem underneath the crosses of the carpet page that opens John’s Gospel. One bird, situated in the upper left-hand quadrant, has blue-and-pink stripes in contrast to others that sport registers of feathers. Stripes had a negative association to the medieval mind, appearing chaotic and disordered. The insane wore stripes, as did prostitutes, criminals, jugglers, sorcerers, and hangmen. Might Eadfrith be warning his viewers that evil lurks hidden in the most unlikely of places? Or was Eadfrith himself practicing humility in avoiding perfection?
All in all, the variety and splendor of the Lindisfarne Gospels are such that even in reproduction, its images astound. Artistic expression and inspired execution make this codex a high point of early medieval art.

Additional resources:

Essay by Louisa Woodville

Want to join the conversation?

  • piceratops ultimate style avatar for user Quinn McLeish
    How were the different coloured inks made?
    (19 votes)
    Default Khan Academy avatar avatar for user
    • piceratops ultimate style avatar for user Gaugoli
      I found the following information on the British Library's website (http://www.bl.uk/onlinegallery/features/lindisfarne/chemistry.html):

      The black or dark brown writing ink is a form of iron gall ink, made from a mixture of oak galls and iron salts.
      The paint used for the illumination was made by mixing coloured pigments with beaten egg white. The pigments came from a variety of mineral, plant and man-made processes. The blues, purples and crimsons are from plant extracts, such as woad, lichen or turnsole. The orange-red colour is Red Lead, made by roasting lead oxide. The yellow is orpiment, a naturally occurring sulphide of arsenic. It can also be made synthetically, but I'm not sure if it was at this early date. Green colours could either be made from mixtures of blue and yellow, or from the green corrosion product of copper (made by suspending copper metal over vinegar). The whites are calcium carbonate, which could be chalk or ground up sea/egg shells. Blacks are made from carbon (soot). Gold was also used, either applied in very thin leaf form, or ground up to form a pigment and painted on.

      However this information dates from 2003 and I think there has been further scientific examination and analysis of the manuscript since then, including Raman Microscopy. Many sources cite other pigments such as the beautiful blue Lapis Lazuli as being present on the manuscript, but this seems to have been based on visual examination alone (fairly unreliable) and as far as I know the scientists who set out to find it could not.

      If anyone has any more reliable and up to date information please add your own answer to this!
      (27 votes)
  • purple pi purple style avatar for user Residuum
    I understand that the cow has been a sacrificial animal for most of human history, And I understand the symbolism there. But why does it have blue wings? Also, how is a green parallelogram a reference to the gospels? I haven't encountered this form of symbolism before.
    (6 votes)
    Default Khan Academy avatar avatar for user
    • male robot johnny style avatar for user Sara Mithra
      The winged ox or cow comes from Ezekial, Book One, in a description of four figures that appear to Ezekial: "5 Within it there were figures resembling four living beings. And this was their appearance: they had human form. 6 Each of them had four faces and four wings. 7 Their legs were straight and [c]their feet were like a calf’s hoof, and they gleamed like burnished bronze." And I think the green parallelogram references the Gospels only in that it looks like a bound book in perspective.
      (9 votes)
  • duskpin ultimate style avatar for user Миленa
    Two things:

    1. The images aren't working on my computer, I don't know if that's because my internet isn't working well or because of some other reason

    2. If you love insular art, check out the movie The Secret of Kells. It's an Oscar-nominated animated movie who's art style is modeled on insular art (in particular, the Book of Kells). The movie is deeply satisfying from both an art perspective and a story perspective and I cannot recommend it enough.
    (4 votes)
    Default Khan Academy avatar avatar for user
  • leaf orange style avatar for user Jeff Kelman
    "The gold halo behind Luke’s head indicates his divinity."

    Can we please get an in depth explanation of the halo? It was unheard of prior to the middle ages as far as I can tell (I have been actively engaged in this entire Khan Art History all the way back to the Venus of Willendorf and then all of sudden this halo thing appears...what is it?).

    Also, I don't simple wish to know the symbolism of it, but rather how it came to be. Surely, the halo has nothing "naturalistic" about it and while I know that the medieval period certainly uses more "unnatural" and "abstract" images...I find the halo to be exceptionally unnatural and abstract for the era to have invented...
    (2 votes)
    Default Khan Academy avatar avatar for user
  • male robot donald style avatar for user Andrew Gillim
    How are these gospels?
    (1 vote)
    Default Khan Academy avatar avatar for user
  • blobby green style avatar for user Norma
    I thought in the art of church history, Matthew was symbolized by an angel, not a man. Is that correct?
    (1 vote)
    Default Khan Academy avatar avatar for user