Main content
Course: The Museum of Modern Art > Unit 1
Lesson 2: 1913 Centennial Celebration- Pablo Picasso, Guitar, Glass, and Bottle
- Umberto Boccioni, "Dynamism of a Soccer Player"
- Louis Comfort Tiffany, Vase
- Vasily Kandinsky, "Klänge (Sounds)"
- Fernand Léger, "Contrast of Forms"
- Lois Weber and Phillips Smalley, "Suspense"
- Giorgio de Chirico, "The Anxious Journey"
- Olga Rozanova, "A Little Duck's Nest... of Bad Words"
- Léon Bakst, "Costume design for the ballet The Firebird"
- Constantin Brancusi, "Mlle Pogany"
- Robert Delaunay, "Simultaneous Contrasts: Sun and Moon"
- D. W. Griffith, "The Mothering Heart"
- Emil Nolde, "Young Couple," 1913
- Léopold Survage, "Colored Rhythm: Study for the Film"
- Ludwig Hohlwein, "Kaffee Hag"
- Mack Sennett, "Barney Oldfield's Race for a Life"
- Louis Raemaekers, "Tegen de Tariefwet, Vliegt niet in't Web!"
- "Composition in Brown and Gray," Piet Mondrian
- Duchamp, 3 Standard Stoppages
- 1913 | Schiess-Dusseldorf by Ludwig Hohlwein
- Matisse, "The Blue Window"
- Ernst Ludwig Kirchner, "Street, Berlin"
- Frank Lloyd Wright, Midway Gardens
© 2024 Khan AcademyTerms of usePrivacy PolicyCookie Notice
Constantin Brancusi, "Mlle Pogany"
To learn more about how abstract artists became the radical thinkers of their time, take our online course, Modern Art, 1880-1945. Created by The Museum of Modern Art.
Want to join the conversation?
- Did this guy really WALK 1000 miles to Paris to make art? That is an unbelievable amount of dedication.(13 votes)
- I know right ?
In his actions,we've learned that if you want to do something ,never give up in it.(7 votes)
- I still didn't get why would he walk that long just to make art.(5 votes)
- Because he is an artist driven by the pursuit of cutting edge art. Paris is the center of the art world. He wanted to be part of the energy, and the experimentation of new art forms that was going on there. He wanted to be at the vortex of the cyclone.(9 votes)
- Having already been presented as a plaster, does this count as a new work of art, or a revision?(3 votes)
- I think, and you are of course free to disagree, that such a significant revision (maybe any revision) to an existing piece constitutes a new work of art. Think about covers of songs that have imparted the covering artist's feelings and emotions into an old piece.(2 votes)
- At1:48she says, "At that time, it was almost incomprehensible" [for people to understand that a female figure could be portrayed this way]. I don't understand how this could be the case, given all of the other steps toward abstraction/unconventional perspectives we've seen up to now in the 20th Century.(2 votes)
- I agree with you! But I think we're looking at it with our contemporary mindset. For more than 400 years people were accustomed to seeing idealized bodies in sculpture and painting, then comes a new guy and says "No! This also represents a woman!" and it disorientes your thinking.
It's like someone saying "This is true and that is false" for four hundred years and another person correcting the first by saying "That is true, this is true, everything you want to be true, is true". I think it blows you away.
Also, there were a lot of negative propaganda that would influence people to reject these new forms of art.(4 votes)
- Why was the plaster of the first sculpture bronzed?(1 vote)
- It was not a "bronzed plaster". watch this video to learn about why a plaster is necessary on the way to having a bronze. https://www.khanacademy.org/partner-content/getty-museum/getty-sculpture/v/de-vries-bronze-casting(2 votes)
- Even if people had not been exposed to art like that at the time, it seems like they would have been able to tell it was a head, not an egg.(1 vote)
- I think that they were just trying to find every way possible to ridicule the sculpture.(2 votes)
- What other examples of "nonsensical" or "incomprehensible" works are deemed especially important to study, either in or around this period, of which exemplify similarly abstract styles?(1 vote)
- One man's nonsense is another mans... Hans Arp and Miro might interest you.(1 vote)
- These sculptures are very interesting. The fact that he walked so far just to make these is phenomenal and it shows how much he loves what he does and how much he believe in it.(1 vote)
- What does his art represent?(0 votes)
- Initially, I think his art was abstract. Then, he began creating art that represents simplicity.(1 vote)
- Why would he call it an egg instead of a person when it clearly looks like a person?(0 votes)
- I do not think he called it an egg, it was viewers of the art that called it an egg. The artist created an abstract self portrait that most people were not familiar with.(1 vote)
Video transcript
(very quiet music) Ann Temkin: I'm standing
in front of a platform full of sculptures by Constantin Brancusi, a Romanian-born artist who walked from Romania to Paris when
he was a young artist. He made sculptures that explored
the idea of abstraction. In the center is Mademoiselle Pogany. The bronze is dated 1913 and it's based on a marble and made
from a plaster from 1912. It was actually a portrait
of a friend of his, Margit Pogany, a young Hungarian woman. When the plaster was on
view in 1913 in New York, it became one of the star
pieces of the Armory Show, not in the sense of being most beloved, but being most ridiculed by
the press and by the visitors. Together with Marcel Duchamp's Nude Descending a Staircase, Mademoiselle Pogany was lampooned probably more than any other object there. What was the problem? It had a name. Brancusi was clearly telling the visitors that this was a portrait. This was not a head, it was
an egg, is what they said. Brancusi delineated the hair not by any sculpted forms of curls. She was considered bald. The facial features by the slightest of descriptive lines or incisions were seen as nonsensical. We're at a point in history where Brancusi is beginning to abstract from a fairly naturalistic image into forms that were much more pure and simplified down to their really essential features. This was something that today, I think, 100 years later, we all look at and know that we're looking at a woman. At that time, it was almost
incomprehensible that that would be how you could
represent somebody's face. (very quiet music)