Main content
Course: The Metropolitan Museum of Art > Unit 1
Lesson 11: The art of dress- Helmschmid, Portions of a costume armor
- Saddle (gser sga) from Derge, Tibet
- Clasp with an eagle and its prey dating from the Parthian Empire
- McQueen, spring/summer 1999 collection, "No. 13"
- Shawl, designed by Deneirouse and Boisglavy
- Poiret, Paris
- Nose Ornament with Spiders from ancient Peru
- James, Evening Dress
© 2024 Khan AcademyTerms of usePrivacy PolicyCookie Notice
McQueen, spring/summer 1999 collection, "No. 13"
Met curator Andrew Bolton on extreme fashion in Alexander McQueen’s No. 13 [Collection], spring/summer 1999.
View this work on metmuseum.org.
Are you an educator? Here's a related lesson plan. For additional educator resources from The Metropolitan Museum of Art, try this and also visit Find an Educator Resource.
. Created by The Metropolitan Museum of Art.Want to join the conversation?
- How would this piece be made?(3 votes)
- Those "wings" are made of balsa wood, which is a lightweight wood that's soft and easy to cut. Balsa is often used in constructing models -- for instance, model airplanes. Balsa can be curved by getting the wood wet, and then shaping it, often over curved forms, and letting it dry. In this piece, it looks like long strips of balsa were shaped, then punched, then joined.(2 votes)
- Would someone ever wear this or anything like this? If so, where would you wear it?(1 vote)
- No, I don't think this would ever be worn by a person except on the runway. It was probably meant to be more of a work of art to be looked at than a piece of clothing to be worn.(1 vote)
Video transcript
This was the first show of McQueen’s I went to. I saw it, Fall, 1998. I’d always had a deep fascination for fashion, but at this stage it was less academic and more personal, really. There was so much mythology around McQueen at this stage. You knew he was going to do something to provoke or to confront you. And I walked in and it was a room with bare floorboards. The models came out and they seemed to just possess the building. One was this winged structure made out of balsawood that’s been perforated that resembles butterfly wings, and they moved in a very light way, they almost fluttered as she walked. In my mind’s eye it was enormous, it had this monumentality to it that was just breathtaking. And when the light shines through it has almost like a stained glass window effect. So she walked into the room, you had this vision of this gothic angel in the face of industrialism. The show was about this tension between craft and technology and man and machine. It’s not about wearability, it’s pure-concept fashion. But I remember thinking at the time: How wonderful to walk around a city of angels where you’d have people dressed like this. And I thought for the first time, he’s actually crossing the divide between art and fashion. He offered a vision of the world that I just hadn’t thought about before, through extreme fashion, that was difficult to watch. He would always say, “I’m not doing a cocktail party, I want my shows to create a reaction, I want them to make you vomit.” What was, I think, rather singular about McQueen was how he imbued his fashions with deep emotion. When I first watched it, it was purely visceral, and made me question the requisites of clothing. To me, fashion is enlivened by people’s intense emotional responses. It’s easier to appreciate it from the head. It’s often harder to appreciate it from the heart, and I think this was one of the shows that initially touched me. My response to it was one of reverence. It in a way made me judge fashion harsher. McQueen would expose the superficiality of some fashions and make you realize that fashion needs to be this elevated discipline. I look back at it now and I still get goose bumps. It changed my eye completely in terms of fashion.