If you're seeing this message, it means we're having trouble loading external resources on our website.

If you're behind a web filter, please make sure that the domains *.kastatic.org and *.kasandbox.org are unblocked.

# Two-step inequalities

Two-step inequalities are slightly more complicated than one-step inequalities (duh!). This is a worked example of solving ⅔>-4y-8⅓. Created by Sal Khan and Monterey Institute for Technology and Education.

## Want to join the conversation?

• why is it so hard to learn?
• because it helps our brains grow and keeps us on top of becoming smarter.
• How would you then answer a question like this type?
4x − 3/2− 3x − 3/3< 3
I cant find any references to this type of equation, since i don't think it is a multi-step inequality
• a calculator would probably help
• I was trying to solve a multi-step inequality but I don't know how to. The inequality is:
-1/4(8n-12) ≥ −2n−1 When I try to solve it the n variable no longer exists and I don't understand how I would continue to solve. When I looked online they said the answer would be all real numbers are solutions but I still do not understand. Please help.
• 1) Distribute the -1/4 on the left side
-1/4(8n-12) ≥ −2n−1
-2n+3 ≥ −2n−1
2) Add 2n to both sides
3 ≥ −1
So, as you have found already, the variable disappears. The inequality that remains is True. 3 is greater than -1. This is called an identify. It tells us that any value of "n" that you use in the inequality will be a solution. So, the solution is all real numbers. You can see this for yourself by picking any value you like for "n" and checking to see if it is a solution. All values will work.

Here are a couple of other scenarios that you might run into:
If your inequality had become 3 ≥ 3, this is also true (an identity). So, again the solution is all real numbers.

If your inequality becomes something like 3 < 1, this is False ( 3 is never less than 1). This is called a contradiction. It means that the inequality has no solution.
• does it matter which side the variable terms are
• If you mean "Does it matter-left or right side of the equals sign?" then no.
However, it is important to get the variable on one side, either the left or the right.
• Why do you have to swap the inequality so that it is less than?
• *When you multiply both sides by a negative value you make the side that is greater have a "bigger" negative number, which actually means it is now less than the other side!* This is why you must flip the sign whenever you multiply by a negative number.
• tell me if im right.........u only switch the inequalities if u multiply or divide by a negative number
• negative means opposite, so the sign goes opposite too
• At , Sal simplifies 2/3 by multiplying it by three(because he's doing that to the other side of the inequality sign). He then crosses out both threes and leaves the two. Why? How does that work? It's probably really obvious, but can someone answer this?
• Sure!, A fraction is just a number divided by another number, therefore to undo the division you multiply. Sal crossed them out because they cancel out each other.
For example,
if you have 6/3 that will equal 2. then multiply by three to get 6. But you should just multiply by the denominator and cancel out everything at the beginning to get 6!
Hope this helps!
• Please, at , why did he say that 8x1/3 is equal to 25? Don't we have to do 8 times 1 and as the numerator is one, we have to keep the 3? So why is it not equal to 8/3?
• 8 1/3 is a mixed number. It is not 8 * 1/3
Sal changed the mixed number into an improper fraction.
(8*3+1)/3 = (24+1)/3 = 25/3
Hope this helps