- The election of 1800
- Jefferson's presidency and the turn of the nineteenth century
- The Louisiana Purchase and its exploration
- Jefferson's election and presidency
- The War of 1812
- The War of 1812
- The Monroe Doctrine
- The presidency of John Quincy Adams
- Politics and regional interests
- The Market Revolution - textile mills and the cotton gin
- The Market Revolution - communication and transportation
- The Market Revolution - impact and significance
- Irish and German immigration
- The 1820s and the Market Revolution
The election of 1800
The growing partisanship between the Federalist camp, led by John Adams, and the Democratic-Republican camp, led by Thomas Jefferson, resulted in a bitterly contested presidential election in 1800.
- The election of 1800 pitted Democratic-Republican Thomas Jefferson against Federalist John Adams.
- The election was a referendum on two different visions of America. The Federalists envisioned a strong central government and a thriving manufacturing sector, while the Democratic-Republicans yearned for an agrarian republic centered on the values of the yeoman farmer
- The election of 1800 was one of the most bitter, contentious, and fiercely partisan presidential elections in US history.
Competing visions: the Federalists and the Democratic-Republicans
George Washington, as the first president of the United States, was acutely aware that everything he did set a precedent. His administration established a fully financed federal government, maintained American neutrality in the French revolutionary wars, and decisively demonstrated its ability to suppress armed resistance by quelling the Whiskey Rebellion, a violent protest against excise taxes on whiskey. Though Washington was opposed to the formation of political parties, his Secretary of State, Thomas Jefferson, and his Secretary of the Treasury, Alexander Hamilton, became the respective leaders of the Democratic-Republican party and the Federalist party, from which emerged the first party system.
In many ways, the election of 1800 was a referendum on how this new young nation—the United States of America—should develop and be governed. John Adams, who had served as George Washington’s vice president before becoming the second president of the United States, represented the Federalist party, while Thomas Jefferson, a wealthy Virginia planter, author of the Declaration of Independence, and vice president under John Adams, represented the Democratic-Republicans (also called the Anti-Federalists).
Portraits of Thomas Jefferson and John Adams.
Adams and Jefferson had different ideas about what the United States should look like and how it should be governed. Whereas Adams and the Federalists, including George Washington, envisioned a strong federal government and a thriving urban manufacturing sector, Jefferson and the Democratic-Republicans adhered to a vision of the nation as an agrarian republic, rooted in the virtues of the independent, or yeoman, farmer.
Issues of the election of 1800
There were a number of pressing issues debated during the presidential campaign. The major foreign policy debate revolved around the appropriate American response to the French Revolution. Jefferson and the Democratic-Republicans were sympathetic to France, while the Federalists leaned more toward Britain, fearing the growing radicalism of the French Revolution and attempting to prevent the United States from being drawn into the conflict. The Federalist party’s pro-British stance led to accusations that Adams and his compatriots were seeking to undo the political effects of the American Revolution and restore the monarchy.
The Alien and Sedition Acts, which John Adams had signed into law in 1798, were another point of contention. The acts made it more difficult for immigrants to become US citizens, and included a provision criminalizing false statements critical of the federal government. This provision was squarely aimed at the Democratic-Republican opposition, which had been sharply critical of Adams and the Federalists. Critics of the Alien and Sedition Acts, many of them Democratic-Republicans, charged that they were unconstitutional and violated the First Amendment right to free speech.
While the Democratic-Republicans were well-organized and effective, the Federalist party suffered from a split between John Adams and Alexander Hamilton. Hamilton penned a 54-page letter denouncing Adams, and it hurt the Federalist cause when it was published after falling into the hands of a Democratic-Republican. The campaigns were bitter and divisive, with both sides launching heated accusations, vilifying each other, and engaging in slander and character assassination. Adams and Jefferson, former friends and compatriots, had become bitter enemies.
“The Revolution of 1800”
In 1800, each state was allowed to choose its own voting day; thus, voting in the presidential election lasted from April through October. With only one state remaining—South Carolina—Adams and Jefferson were tied, with 65 electoral votes each. When South Carolina returned its results, it awarded the election to Jefferson. However, there were a number of disputed returns, and the election was ultimately decided in the House of Representatives.
Map of the electoral college votes in the election of 1800. Jackson carried the South and most of the mid-Atlantic, while Adams captured New England.
Jefferson had chosen for his running mate Aaron Burr, a New Yorker who had served as president of the Senate. (Burr would later go down in infamy for killing Alexander Hamilton in a duel in 1804.) But during the election of 1800, Burr proved a consummate tactician, gaining control of the state legislature of New York and awarding its votes to Jefferson.
The election of 1800 was fiercely contested and extremely acrimonious, to the point that outgoing president John Adams refused to even shake incoming president Thomas Jefferson’s hand. The election facilitated the spread of bitter partisanship, and ushered in the demise of the Federalist party and a political realignment that effectively ended the first party system.
At the same time, it was the first peaceful transfer of power from one political party to another. Despite the fierce hostility of the campaigns and the election, Federalist John Adams bequeathed the presidency to his greatest political foe and rival, Democratic-Republican Thomas Jefferson. This demonstrated and strengthened the viability of the American democratic system.
What do you think?
Which vision of America do you find more compelling: that of the Federalists or that of the Democratic-Republicans?
Would you have voted for Adams or for Jefferson? Why?
Why do you think the election of 1800 was so acrimonious and bitter? How does it compare to other highly-contentious elections in US history?
Want to join the conversation?
- What about Aaron Burr? I thought he was actually the one who was tied with Thomas Jefferson, not Adams.(36 votes)
- That's what I thought as well. I was pretty sure Adams wasn't even close because his party rejected him when he didn't go to war with France as they wanted.(2 votes)
- When did they decide that having the runner-up, no matter what party he was in, become the VP was a bad idea and change that policy?(13 votes)
- It was clear this policy was not the most effective beginning with John Adam's presidency (1797-1801) because Thomas Jefferson's Anti-Federalist ideas clashed with Adam's political stance. Relations with France was a strong point of contention between the two. Their cooperation was limited at best.
The 12th Amendment required electors in the electoral college to specify who they were voting for as either President or Vice-President. Congress passed the 12th Amendment at the end of 1803 and enough states had ratified it that it became part of the Constitution on June 15th, 1804.(24 votes)
- I've heard the Election of 1800 described as "the most significant election in American history." Why might that be?(2 votes)
- Well, there are many reasons for that:
(1) It was the first time that power in America was passed from one party to another;
(2) It set the precedence to a peaceful transfer of power, even between two dissenting parties;
(3) It led to the creation of the 12th Amendment of the Constitution, which allows people to vote for the President and Vice President on separate ballots, while in the past the Vice President was the runner-up for the presidency;
(4) The Election of 1800 marked the moderation of the Democratic Party (then named 'Democratic-Republican'), and led to the definitive demise of the Federalist party in U.S. politics.(24 votes)
- how long did the election of 1800 last? Why?(7 votes)
- As stated in the article above "In 1800, each state was allowed to choose its own voting day; thus, voting in the presidential election lasted from April through October."(6 votes)
- Even though Washington said not to divide the nation into parties how did the parties come to be anyway.(2 votes)
- Every person doesn't agree about everything. That's just human nature, we may agree that we both like pepperoni pizza, but someone else can say that they like cheese better. And someone else can say they don't like pepperoni or cheese, they like veggie pizza. That's just an analogy on why people don't agree about every single thing, hence why parties formed because people have different ideas and values on different topics. I hope this answer was helpful!(13 votes)
- What causes Americans to create these very different political parties?(3 votes)
- because different Americans have different views on the government(6 votes)
- Were there any major acts of rebellion against those who intensely disagreed with Jefferson/ had chosen Adams instead?(6 votes)
- Do you think Jefferson's morals played into the election results?(4 votes)
- i'd say probably because morals tend to play into political views.(4 votes)
- what was the Domestic policy of George washington??(2 votes)
- George Washington did not have a political party. In fact, he warned against political parties in his farewell speech.(8 votes)
- Was the united states in the early republic primarily agriculture(4 votes)
- If you are speaking of the early time period such as the late 1600's, early 1700's, the South was based upon agriculture due to their good soil and slave labor. As for the North, they have soil that was good for wheat and things of that nature, but mainly on trade due to the weather changes. That is still in the late 1700's, and early 1800's when the South was creating cotton, and giving it to the North to create cotton based goods with other newer machinery. So in short terms, if you speaking of America when first colonized... then yes, and no. :) (Mind you, North and South had different climates)(6 votes)