Main content
US history
Course: US history > Unit 1
Lesson 4: Spanish colonization- Spanish colonization
- The Spanish conquistadores and colonial empire
- Pueblo uprising of 1680
- Comparing European and Native American cultures
- Lesson summary: The Spanish empire
- Spanish colonization
- Labor, slavery, and caste in the Spanish colonial system
© 2023 Khan AcademyTerms of usePrivacy PolicyCookie Notice
Comparing European and Native American cultures
In this video, Kim discusses how mutual misunderstandings between Europeans and Native Americans often defined the early years of interaction and trade as each group sought to make sense of the other.
Want to join the conversation?
- It seems like Native Americans were monotheistic, or at least their equivalent of monotheistic, with one primary Great Creator. So how does this differ from the exclusivity of European Catholocism mentioned at? 5:32(5 votes)
- European monotheists believed that only the ONE TRUE GOD in whom they believed was true. It didn't matter if anyone else (Muslims, for example) worshipped only one God, if that wasn't the same god as the Europeans believed in, it wasn't god at all.(14 votes)
- Why in this video that it seems like Native Americans become equivalent to the Europeans, like sharing and comparing and even marriages, wasn't it that European enslaved them and took their lands without discussions?(5 votes)
- I believe that it depended on the area of colonization. From what I've seen, in the northern, British colonies, it was more likely that they didn't enslave the native people. Versus in the southern, Mexican colonies, the Spanish were more on the lookout for labor and resources. It was more likely that the British were more open to marriage with the natives than the Spanish.(9 votes)
- I think the most significant difference is that are the gender role,because the woman were more free and they had more rights.They didn't half to help with all the cooking and and sometimes they could hunt. 7:03(8 votes)
- How did they manage to establish communication with each other if they didn't know each other's language or culture?(3 votes)
- It was definitely difficult, more than interacting with somebody of a different language and culture today since the natives were vastly different due to their and the Europeans' isolation from each other. I guess they at first relied on ideas that were common to most every human, like "if I don't attack you, I might not be hostile". Then, perhaps they used pantomiming or something to learn words of each other's languages. Then there would be people who knew bits of both languages, and could translate for others. Many native tribes had experience learning languages while trading with different tribes, so it may not have been as impossible of a task as you think.(8 votes)
- Did the Native Americans have a name for their religion?(2 votes)
- The native Americans weren't just one people. Being made up of such diverse tribes, there were and still are many Native American religions. Many of these were animistic to some extent, but they were all very different from each other. If you really need a name for the Native American religions, name them based on the tribe that practices it.(9 votes)
- Why is social studies so complicated? For example Fromto 0:007:08(2 votes)
- Social studies is (are) so complicated because it has to do with what people have done. People are not simple.(4 votes)
- I'm wondering about the slightly glossy depiction of life prior to the Spanish arrival.Didn't the Aztecs have their own form of slavery going on? There is mention that they weren't "popular" with the native population-they took prisoners of war, crimes, etc and either sacrificed them or enslaved them-so where is that part?(3 votes)
- that wouldn't be in the scope of the video, which discussed differences between the view of land, property and trade, gender roles, and religion between the American and European civilizations, although it is true that Aztecs enslaved people.(2 votes)
- the reason why i think there were so many culteral
differences was because they were different cultures(3 votes) - How was the history between the Europeans and Native Americans documented?(2 votes)
- Colonizers kept log books. Of course, the records cannot be entirely trusted, but because these log books were also for business, which involved profit, loss and taxation, we can get some idea from them.(2 votes)
- Why in the video it seems that the Natives and Europeans start to become more close, not as war like?(2 votes)
Video transcript
- [Instructor] In the
first years of interaction between Native Americans and Europeans, there were a lot of aspects
of each other's cultures that each group found,
well, just plain weird. Europeans and Native
Americans looked, dressed, and thought differently
in fundamental ways that lead to misunderstandings and even violence between them. So let's take some time
to compare some ways in which Native American
cultural ideas differed from European cultural ideas. So how is it possible to
make a direct comparison between Native American
cultures and European cultures? One way is to choose a few categories of social interaction and belief and identify how each
group conceived of them. Here, I've chosen ideas about
land and property ownership, gender roles, and religion
as areas to compare. Now before we start, I wanna
put a big asterisk here and say that these are generalizations, just as the English,
French, Spanish, Dutch didn't have all exactly the same religion or a concept of proper gender roles. The Algonquians, Iroquois, Pueblos, and Mississippians
weren't identical either, but there were some similarities
among European groups and among Native American
groups that allow us to compare and contrast them more broadly. So let's start identifying
these differences and exploring what
effect they may have had on how the two groups
perceived and interacted with each other. One major difference between
Europeans and Native Americans was in their ideas about land ownership. To Europeans, land was
owned by individuals and passed down through families. They had the right to
fence off a plot of land and prevent trespassing. For Native Americans, land
ownership was less defined and more temporary. One tribe might claim
control of a hunting range or one family might farm a
plot of land for a season but they didn't own it forever. Most land was free for everyone to use but not to own. So when Europeans arrived,
Native Americans might agree to let them farm and
hunt in their territories but they didn't expect that
Europeans would then fence off that land and prevent
others from using it. Likewise, Europeans were
confused when Native Americans continued to use land that they thought they had purchased to own forever. Native Americans also tended to have a more communal approach
to property and trade. To them, trading
relationship were important and they require a lot of
feasting and gift giving to cement ties between tribes. Europeans were frequently
frustrated by the amount of pomp and circumstance
Native Americans demanded to complete what they saw as
a simple business transaction. Partly, this had to do
with how Native Americans viewed property in general. While Europeans gained
high status in society by owning a lot of things
and therefore being rich, Native Americans achieved
high status by giving a lot of things away, being a
source of riches for others. So unlike in Europe where
there were huge gaps between the rich and the poor,
Native American societies were comparatively egalitarian. It was pretty rare for
someone to go hungry if their neighbor had food to spare. Europeans couldn't tell
if Native Americans were just naturally generous, kind people or if they maybe just didn't
get how business worked and to Native Americans,
Europeans seemed greedy and selfish, allowing others
to starve and do without so that they could enrich themselves. Differences in gender roles
also confused the groups. In European societies, men
were the heads of household and they were in charge of outdoor labor. Women took care of the
home but they also have relatively few rights. They couldn't participate politically, own property, or get divorced. In Native American societies,
men hunted and fished and conducted warfare which often meant that they were away from
home for weeks or months. Consequently, women did the farming since they were home to tend the crops. Native women also had a lot more freedom than European women. They could get divorced, they could give political advice to councils. Many Native American
societies were matrilineal so children belonged to
their mother's family rather than their father's
and when a couple got married, the man moved in with his wife's family, not the other way around. To Europeans, gender
roles in Native society almost seemed like they
were flipped upside down and they took this as evidence that Native people were uncivilized. To Native Americans, it
looked like Europeans could barely care for themselves. They had to be taught
how to farm, how to fish, even how to hunt effectively
in the new world. Finally, Native and European
religious practices differ, at least, on the surface. Native Americans tended to believe that one great creator had made the world and that nature was imbued with spirits who would reward or punish them based on how well they took care of the land. In fact, this actually
wasn't that much different from the Catholicism of Europeans who believed in a single god
but also many helpful saints. But where they differed
was in exclusivity. When Europeans introduced
them to Jesus and Mary and the saints, many
Native Americans were happy to include them in their
pantheon of helpful spirits. But this angered Europeans who insisted on exclusive worship of the Christian god. All of this differences
lead to fraught interactions between Europeans and Native Americans. But despite these
differences, they also adopted many useful aspects of each
other's culture over time especially in terms of trade. Native Americans were
keen to get their hands on the metal implements
for cooking and farming and hunting that Europeans possessed as well as guns and
horses which were great for transportation and
also for making war. Europeans were also willing to take part in the social rituals and trading rituals of Native Americans,
sometimes even marrying into Native American families
so they could get access to furs hunted by Native Americans and to Native Americans as allies in their wars against
rival European powers and the Americas. So as we wrap up, I encourage you to take a closer look at this chart. Is there anything you find
particularly surprising about these differences? Where do you think that
Europeans and Native Americans were most likely to find
common ground between them? And lastly, which of
these cultural aspects do you think was the most
significant difference between Europeans and
Native Americans and why?