- John F. Kennedy as president
- Bay of Pigs Invasion
- Cuban Missile Crisis
- The Cuban Missile Crisis
- Lyndon Johnson as president
- Vietnam War
- The Vietnam War
- The student movement and the antiwar movement
- Second-wave feminism
- The election of 1968
- 1960s America
During the 1960s, influenced and inspired by the Civil Rights Movement, women of all ages began to fight to secure a stronger role in American society.
- During the 1960s, influenced and inspired by the Civil Rights Movement, women of all ages began to fight to secure a stronger role in American society.
- As members of groups like the National Organization for Women (NOW) asserted their rights and strove for equality for themselves and others, they upended many accepted norms and set groundbreaking social and legal changes in motion.
- Title VII is the section of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 that prohibited discrimination in employment on the basis of gender.
From the Civil Rights Movement to Women's Liberation
In the 1950s and 1960s, the Civil Rights Movement was creating a climate of protest as activists claimed rights and new positions in society for people of color.
Women filled significant roles in organizations fighting for civil rights like the Student National Coordinating Committee (SNCC) and Students for a Democratic Society (SDS). However, women often found that those organizations—enlightened as they might have been about racial issues or the war in Vietnam—could still be influenced by patriarchal ideas of male superiority.
Two members of SNCC, Casey Hayden and Mary King, presented some of their concerns about their organization’s treatment of women in a document entitled “On the Position of Women in SNCC,” which argued that SNCC practiced discrimination against women similar to the discrimination practiced against African Americans by whites. Stokely Carmichael, field organizer and future chairman of SNCC, joked that the position for women in the movement was “prone.”
Nevertheless, the Civil Rights Movement contributed materially to women's rights. The Civil Rights Act of 1964, which prohibited discrimination in employment on the basis of race, color, national origin, and religion, also prohibited discrimination on the basis of sex in Title VII. Ironically, protection for women had been included at the suggestion of a Virginia congressman in an attempt to prevent the act’s passage; his reasoning seemed to be that, while a white man might accept that African Americans needed and deserved protection from discrimination, the idea that women deserved equality with men would be far too radical for any of his male colleagues to contemplate. Nevertheless, the act passed, granting broad workplace protections to women and minorities.
The Feminine Mystique and NOW
Just as the abolitionist movement made nineteenth-century women more aware of their lack of power and encouraged them to form the first women’s rights movement--sometimes called first-wave feminism--the protest movements of the 1960s inspired many white and middle-class women to create their own organized movement for greater rights--known as second-wave feminism. Many were older, married women who found the traditional roles of housewife and mother unfulfilling.
In 1963, writer and feminist Betty Friedan published The Feminine Mystique, a nonfiction book in which she contested the post-World War II belief that it was women’s destiny to marry and bear children. Friedan’s book was a best-seller and began to raise the consciousness of many women who agreed that homemaking in the suburbs sapped them of their individualism and left them unsatisfied.
In 1966, the National Organization for Women (NOW), formed and proceeded to set an agenda for the feminist movement. Framed by a statement of purpose written by Friedan, the agenda began by proclaiming NOW’s goal to make possible women’s participation in all aspects of American life and to gain for them all the rights enjoyed by men. Among the specific goals set was the passage of the Equal Rights Amendment (ERA), a proposed Constitutional Amendment guaranteeing equal rights for women. First introduced in Congress in 1923, the ERA was passed in 1972 but failed to receive the 38 state ratifications necessary to become part of the Constitution. It has yet to be adopted today.
Medical science also contributed a tool to assist women in their liberation. In 1960, the US Food and Drug Administration approved the birth control pill, freeing women from the restrictions of pregnancy and childbearing. Women who were able to limit, delay, and prevent reproduction were freer to work, attend college, and delay marriage. Within five years of the pill’s approval, some six million women were using it.
The pill was the first medicine ever intended to be taken by people who were not sick. Even conservatives saw it as a possible means of making marriages stronger by removing the fear of an unwanted pregnancy and improving the health of women. Its opponents, however, argued that it would promote sexual promiscuity, undermine the institutions of marriage and the family, and destroy the moral code of the nation. By the early 1960s, 30 states had made it a criminal offense to sell contraceptive devices.
More radical feminists, like their colleagues in other movements, were dissatisfied with merely redressing economic issues. They devised their own brand of consciousness-raising events and symbolic attacks on women’s oppression.
The most famous of these was an event staged in September 1968 by New York Radical Women. Protesting stereotypical notions of femininity and rejecting traditional gender expectations, the group demonstrated at the Miss America Pageant in Atlantic City, New Jersey, to bring attention to the contest’s—and society’s—exploitation of women. The protestors crowned a sheep Miss America and then tossed instruments of women’s oppression, including high-heeled shoes, curlers, girdles, and bras, into a “freedom trash can.” News accounts famously, and incorrectly, described the protest as a “bra burning."
What do you think?
Do you think that second-wave feminism was a separate movement from the Civil Rights Movement, or just a different facet of it? Why?
Compare and contrast first-wave feminism (epitomized by figures like Susan B. Anthony) with second-wave feminism (epitomized by figures like Betty Friedan). What were the goals of each movement? To what extent, if at all, did either movement champion the rights of poor women or minority women?
Why do you think the Equal Rights Amendment (ERA) has never been ratified?
Do you think the second-wave feminist movement achieved its goals? Why or why not?
Want to join the conversation?
- Why did they choose to burn things of womens oppression instead of peaceful protests?(0 votes)
- From the author:It's a myth that the feminist protesters burned bras. Instead, they labeled a trash can "Freedom Trash Can" and encouraged women to throw objects they considered oppressive (like corsets) into the trash can as a demonstration. I think that's a pretty peaceful protest!(66 votes)
- 1) I think that second-wave feminism was a different facet of the Civil Rights movement because instead of equal rights among races second-wave feminism was equal rights among genders of all races.
2) The differences between the 2 waves of feminism was that the first wave wanted to just be able to vote when the 2nd wanted everything to be equal to men. To an extent these helped poor women and minority women because now women could now play the role of the financial provider in their respective families.
3) ERA has never been ratified in my opinion because at the end of the day women I think that congress thinks that there are more important issues. Though this is totally wrong and should be changed immediately it hasn't.
4) I don't think second-wave feminism achieved all of its goals because even though there was a progression in the fairness and equality among men and women it wasn't to the extent of what the second-wave feminists wanted it to be.(11 votes)
- When was NOW established? What were it's main goals?(6 votes)
- NOW was established in 1966. It’s main goals were for women to have equal opportunities in education, careers, and health care.(10 votes)
- "Its opponents, however, argued that it would promote sexual promiscuity, undermine the institutions of marriage and the family, and destroy the moral code of the nation."
With the exception of abortion not having been mentioned, they were right.(6 votes)
- The only difference between abortion and contraception is that far more people find abortion distasteful as opposed the pill. Abortion destroys physically present cells that would in the vast majority of cases become a living breath human, and not just any human, but a child of the patient. The pill simply prevents an infinite number of potential, non-physical beings, each incredibly unlikely, from ever forming.(3 votes)
- When did they completely stop prohibiting contraceptives in USA?(3 votes)
- From the author:I don't think there's a single answer to that! States generally have control over these issues, and there are different policies in different states. Some states may prohibit methods of contraception that other states permit, even today.(7 votes)
- Between 1970, ten years after the pill, and 2010, marriage rates went nothing but down. And in that time, all sorts of promiscuous people, references, and cultural mindsets which include the endorsement of sexual promiscuity (SATC, anyone?) have arose in the US. Marriage rates were already in the relative can throughout much of the 60's. Frankly, I find that to be the very definition of moral degeneration. What truly saddens me is the feminist interpretation of this. They claimed and continue to claim the contraceptive pill is simply a tool to postpone other commitments to entrench oneself in an education and/or career. I have nothing against that; I'm male after all, and magically doubling the general workforce sounds great to me. I also think it's perfectly reasonable to say that it is impossible or unhelpful to be married with kids when trying to get on "your own two feet," so to speak. However, there is a cheaper, more trustworthy, and more time-efficient that feminists everywhere had used for the last several thousand years, to great effect: celibacy! No sex, no kids, no birth control. The Feminists wanted to have their cake (and it was a very nice cake), and then demanded to eat it too for no good reason, to the the detriment of everyone, including themselves, forever.(5 votes)
- why was there so much of a problem in 1950 to 1960(3 votes)
- The problems which second-wave feminism addressed in the 1950s and 1960s had always been there. What the second wave did was to describe them and focus attention on the situations.(3 votes)
- Who were the major spokespeople for feminism? Was any woman particularly known for being inspirational and speaking up against stereotypes?(2 votes)
- Louisa May Alcott: 1832–1888. ...
Susan B. Anthony: ...
Clara Barton: 1821–1912. ...
Elizabeth Blackwell: 1821–1910.(4 votes)