If you're seeing this message, it means we're having trouble loading external resources on our website.

If you're behind a web filter, please make sure that the domains *.kastatic.org and *.kasandbox.org are unblocked.

Main content
Current time:0:00Total duration:5:51
AP.GOPO:
PRD‑2.D (LO)
,
PRD‑2.D.1 (EK)

Video transcript

what we're going to do in this video is talk about modern campaigns in particular we're going to talk about the cost and the duration of modern campaigns especially in the United States and this graphic here which comes from the campaign finance Institute and it's based on data from the Federal Election Committee it clearly shows how the cost of congressional campaigns have increased a mat dramatically since 1986 if you look at nominal dollars for the House of Representatives so this is just the actual dollar amount you see it's almost grown by a factor of four or five but even if you adjust it for inflation the cost has doubled for your average house campaign and you see a similar trend in the Senate campaigns where even adjusted for inflation the cost of your average Senate campaign has increased by 50% now this also does not capture all of the outside money things like super PACs and whatever else if you fast forward to 2016 your average Senate campaign costs a little over 10 million dollars but there's about that much money approximately 10 million dollars that also comes in from things like super PACs and so it's totally near 20 million dollars for Senate campaign on average and so particularly competitive campaigns can be a lot more than even that and if you want to talk about really big money you just have to look at presidential campaigns so this right over here is the last presidential campaign in 2016 and you can see that Hillary Clinton's candidate committee money was over half a billion dollars she actually had a good bit more than Donald Trump and she had a good bit more outside money but the entire Hillary Clinton campaign had nearly 800 million dollar budget and if you combine Hillary Clinton Plus Donald Trump you have a total of 1.2 billion dollars for the 2016 campaign in 1980 the total was 92 million it's more than a 12 fold increase and even if you order it just for inflation which these numbers are not but new if you did you would see a several fold increase in the cost of a campaign so when you look at these types of numbers there's a couple of interesting questions that come up one is what is the money for money for what well there's many answers to that one is is that especially in a presidential campaign and to a lesser degree in a congressional campaign the campaigns have to pay professional full-time staffers so campaign campaign staff you will often have a lot of volunteers but for example Hillary Clinton in 2016 had approximately 4,200 people on payroll we're about eight hundred people were working directly for her campaign another four hundred with the Democratic National Committee and roughly three thousand people with state Democratic parties in the battleground states and Beyond on the staff you also might have paid political consultants and what do all of these people do well they come up with a campaign strategy some of them will do polling to understand the sentiment in the larger population on specific issues or on the candidate and they will do a lot of campaign advertising and marketing advertising and so the staff will think about well what kind of advertising do we need to do and then a large chunk of the money actually goes to the advertising itself advertising especially in mass media for thinking about radio and television now an interesting question is given that in the 2016 campaign Hillary Clinton outspent Donald Trump by so much how was he able to actually win that campaign well there's several possible explanations to that one is is that Donald Trump was very effective at getting himself attention that he didn't have to spend money for on top of that a trend that has emerged really since the 2008 Obama campaign is the increasing use of social media in campaigns before social media became a major player most of that energy really was in mass media advertising but now with social media you could cater a message to specific groups you could focus your message you can activate your base more and so more and more social media which is currently a lot less expensive than say TV advertise it's becoming a bigger and bigger part of campaigns now the last answer to the question of why so much money is that you have long campaigns in the United States in some countries the campaigns might be anywhere from two to six weeks in the United States the formal campaign if you think about the first primaries it's in February of an election year in a presidential cycle and then the election is in November so you're looking at roughly nine to ten months from the first primary and caucuses to the election but well before the first caucus you're going to have the various candidates raising money and trying to get name recognition and so the actual campaign and money raising for a lot of these candidates might be closer to two years and so you can imagine if you're spending two years with consultants trying to do advertising just so you have a showing in some of those first caucuses and primaries well that's going to cost you a lot of money now it's for you to think about whether these are good or bad things many people would argue that having such a long election cycle doesn't allow a lot of focus on other things especially if someone's the incumbent if they're campaigning the whole time can they even govern and then another argument against all of this money is it might put too much influence in the hands of people who can give money I'll let you think about that