(lively music) Steven: We're on the
Ile de la Cite in Paris, sandwiched in between Sainte-Chapelle and the Palace of Justice,
in a large, open square. Beth: Not far from the Louvre. Steven: This is the very heart of Paris. Beth: We're looking at an entranceway for the Paris Metro that was designed by Hector Guimard around 1900. Steven: It's one of the quintessential examples of the art nouveau. Beth: And it's not
situated in any one place. About 100 of these that were manufactured out of cast iron, painted
green to look like bronze that has acquired a patina. Steven: Copper often turns
that beautiful blue or green, and this is painted in
order to look like that, but bronze is far too expensive, and this was meant to be done cheaply. Beth: It was manufactured
in a modular system that allowed it to be produced in large number and easily assembled. Steven: It was wildly modern, but of course it wasn't
only for the elite. It was for everybody. Beth: It was shift in the art nouveau, from a style associated
with expensive items for an industrial nouveau riche, to applying that style,
with its organic forms, to something that's mass produced. This is a subway station for
a middle class that needed to move around freely in
this new capitalist culture. It's a good reminder that
there are idealist aspirations of creating something
beautiful for the masses, something that could be mass-produced and easy to assemble and cheap. Beauty wasn't only for the
rich, for the aristocracy. Steven: The Paris subway as a project was accelerated because of the coming of a large exposition in
1900 in Paris, and this was meant to help move a lot
of people around the city, and of course it has been
incredibly successful. But let's take a look. There's nothing like it in the subways that I'm used to in New York City. Beth: It announces itself. It doesn't hide. It isn't afraid of its modernity. Steven: You just hit on one of the main issues for the art nouveau. It was to counter all the
historicizing that had been so much a part of the 19th Century. Think about architecture, for example. You have people reviving the
Gothic, the Egyptian style. You have people reviving the classical. So Guimard is asking, what would a purely modern style look like? It's interesting that
he goes back to nature. Beth: A lot of architects
were asking this question, instead of looking back at
those older styles and using that vocabulary: how could the artist of the late 19th Century, of
this mass industrial culture, create a style that suited that culture? In fact, art nouveau existed across Europe and had different regional
variations in Spain, in Vienna, in Belgium; and
in France we see the use of organic forms, like
we see here with Guimard. Steven: I'm looking up at the sign itself. It's held up, suspended
between two plant-like stalks that look as if they're budding,
except that the blossom, which is yet to open, is actually a lamp. There's a tree that's right
next to one of the posts. One of its branches is
tucked under the lamp, and you can really see the
distinction between nature and this highly stylized
representation of the organic, which is really the point here. This is not a representation of nature. It is a stylizing of a quality of growth. Beth: Growth is the key word. There are places where
we have upward movement, those columns made to look
like stalks that support the lamp; but we also see forms that seem to kind of melt or move downward. Steven: There's also a
quality of unfurling, the way that a palm frond, or especially the frond of a fern uncurls as it grows. There is this wonderful quality
not only of the organic, but of a kind of organic in motion. This gate is in awfully good condition, although you can see in
places where the paint is chipped off, it's been
repainted many times, and there's certainly some rust. There's one section that's
in extremely good condition, and that's the sign that
says, "Metropolitain". Beth: That was made out of ground [lava]. The architect is intentionally looking for materials that are going to last. Steven: It's a kind of ceramic. The part of that sign that I found most beautiful is the typeface. The letters have a really
organic, rounded quality. It feels hand drawn, in some ways. Look at the "L" that almost looks like a leg that's walking forward. Beth: It's a real playful quality to it. Steven: Notice how it moves
from a dark green-blue, down to a lighter blue;
and so the entire object, from the typeface, to
the oval of the sign, to the wonderful sinuous, unfurling stalks that surround it, everything
feels as if it's in motion, that there's a kind of dynamism. What a perfect visual
metaphor for a subway system. (lively music)