Main content
Europe 1800 - 1900
Course: Europe 1800 - 1900 > Unit 2
Lesson 2: France- Romanticism in France
- Gros, Napoleon Bonaparte Visiting the Plague-Stricken in Jaffa
- Gros, Napoleon Bonaparte Visiting the Plague-Stricken in Jaffa
- Ingres, Portrait of Madame Rivière
- Ingres, Napoleon on His Imperial Throne
- Ingres, Apotheosis of Homer
- Ingres, La Grande Odalisque
- Painting colonial culture: Ingres’s La Grande Odalisque
- Ingres, La Grande Odalisque
- Ingres, Princesse de Broglie
- Ingres, Raphael and the Fornarina
- Géricault, Raft of the Medusa
- Géricault, Raft of the Medusa
- Géricault, Raft of the Medusa
- Géricault, Portraits of the Insane
- Eugène Delacroix, an introduction
- Delacroix, Scene of the Massacre at Chios
- Delacroix, The Death of Sardanapalus
- The cost of war: Delacroix, Greece on the Ruins of Missolonghi
- Delacroix, Liberty Leading the People
- Delacroix, Liberty Leading the People
- Delacroix, Liberty Leading the People
- Delacroix, Murals in the Chapel of The Holy Angels, Saint-Sulpice
- Rude, La Marseillaise
- Romanticism in France
© 2023 Khan AcademyTerms of usePrivacy PolicyCookie Notice
Delacroix, The Death of Sardanapalus
Eugène Delacroix, The Death of Sardanapalus, 1827, oil on canvas, 12 ft 10 in x 16 ft 3 in. (3.92 x 4.96m) (Musée du Louvre, Paris) Speakers: Drs. Beth Harris and Steven Zucker. Created by Beth Harris and Steven Zucker.
Want to join the conversation?
- I see what appears to be a horizontal line across the canvas. Was this painting damaged in some way?(6 votes)
- From the author:This is a very large painting and in such cases, it was common for artists to join two pieces of canvas together. I suspect you are noticing this seam. It can be more or less evident depending of the lighting and can also become more visible over time.(11 votes)
- Did anyone notice that his face was not as detailed and vibrant as the women's faces were?(1 vote)
- Where was the usage of blue and green hues in the shadows?(1 vote)
- Does the King's indifference and cruelty represent corrupt monarchy like in Delacroix's "Scene of the Massacre at Chios?"(1 vote)
- Maybe it was Delacroix' protest against the corruption of the king of his own country at that time, disguised as being about some other king somewhere else. This is not an uncommon technique used by artists and literati around the world.(1 vote)
- Interesting that the king is described as indifferent - I can see that to a point, but he also comes across as irritated and defiant. Does anyone else see this?
Also, his body shape is unnatural and almost invokes the "s" shape that is seen in other parts of the painting. The bed is huge, too!(1 vote) - I mean why would he do that?(1 vote)
- Hey, it's a story, told by people in the west about people in the east, their political, religious and economic competitors. Of COURSE they were painted as evil and corrupt.(1 vote)
- i think the main man( who destorys his possesion) is wearing dresses....
how do you think?(1 vote) - For me it feels as though the golden elephant is crying.Is it to show that even non-living things feel all the violence which is going on in the painting ?(1 vote)
- I believe it to be a violent wave of terror all for the King's humor. All corrupt and confusing to build the voice of the King's mad state of mind.(1 vote)
- i don't get it why dose he kill all the woman(1 vote)
- What an evil, corrupt king! what kind of kind would do that? One that is most evidently deprived or his civil self and humanity! Did he have any mental problems?(1 vote)
- This is was at the root of mentality that was prelude to what happened in Algeria; a million or more Algerians were murdered. French during their occupation used art as a way to sexualize Algerian women, and today's France is reflection of these very same attitudes. This is not very much different than how India's right wing BJP use the language like 'Love Jihad' to demonize Muslims and other minorities. These painting are very much akin to tabloid of that era.(1 vote)
Video transcript
(piano music) Woman: We're in Louvre
and we're looking at Delacroix's the Death of Sardanapalus,
which was exhibited at the Salon of 1827. Man: It's a huge canvas and it turns
every classical rule on its head. Woman: Including the idea of
having a painting with a hero. Here we have Sardanapalus
who is anything but a hero. Man: This is the height
of romantic painting, and in fact its story comes from
a romantic poet, Lord Byron, and it's the story of the
Sysyrian King Sardanapalus who is being vanquished in
battle but rather than surrender, has decided not only to kill
himself, he's going to destroy
everything that he finds pleasure in, the women, his slaves, all
of his ornament, all of his
treasure will be burned. Everything will come to an end. So this is a giant funerary pyar. Woman: So he sits high up on
that bed propping his head up, looking with supreme
indifference at the end of the lives of the women in his life, the end of all his beautiful possessions. Man: So this is a painting
that is about corruption and it is the antithesis of the nobility
of David and of the neoclassical tradition that came before romanticism. Woman: If you think back
to neoclassical paintings with their very rigorous
construction of space, where you can really clearly
see where everything is in relationship to everything else. Here we have a space
that's full of objects. All of the king's really
luxurious possessions, gold and jewels and horses, and the space isn't so much
constructed as filled up. Man: And it feels like everything in it, all of the bodies, the
horses, the objects, they're all flames themselves. Recalling the flame that
are about to be there, licking up in this
serpentine curvilinear forms. So look at the horse for instance, which is practically an S-shape. Look at one the arms of the harp
that's in the bottom middle, or the women themselves, these Arabasks. You can look at the scarf
at the bottom of the bed. All of these things are
snakelike and serpentine as if they themselves are the
flames that are referenced. Woman: So there is all of this
sense of writhing movement but the king at the top who sits very
still and watches with that corrupt gaze, on this bed that is foreshortened, and so we have this idea of everything
spilling down into our space, very much the artist's intention to engage
the viewer and to appeal to our emotions. The woman in the foreground
is being brutally murdered right before our eyes. The horse is being pulled against
its will to a funeral pyar. This is a scene of death and destruction
that is happening as close as possible to the viewer's space. Man: This must have been
such a huge shock to a public that was used to looking at the
clarity and precision of geometry. The rationalism, the
heroism of the neoclassical. All of this violence, all of this luxury, is perfectly suited to Delacroix's
signature use of brilliant color at least in contrast to the kind of
modulation of color that the very subtly colored paintings that were
traditional in the Salon. Woman: If you look at
the flesh of the figures you don't see just that
normal tonal modeling that we've come to expect
in neoclassical paintings but we see figures where the
shadows are greens and blues, and the highlights are oranges and golds. Delacroix is really thinking
about color in a much more
emotional and passionate way. Man: This painting really
is an orgy of violence. It's an orgy of luxury and
it's an orgy of corruption. (piano music)