Main content
Europe 1800 - 1900
Course: Europe 1800 - 1900 > Unit 5
Lesson 1: Art and the French stateGarnier, Paris Opéra
Charles Garnier, The Paris Opéra, 1860-75. Created by Beth Harris and Steven Zucker.
Want to join the conversation?
- What is meant by Second Empire style at? 1:02(11 votes)
- This was the architectural style popular during the French Second Empire from 1865 and 1880. It had Neo-Renaissance and Neo-Baroque elements and was very ornate. In the United States, the Second Empire style is noted for its central tower and mansard roofs. Think the Addams Family house.(14 votes)
- Isn't the Opera Garnier the opera which was the setting of Gaston Lereux's novel Phantom of the Opera?(10 votes)
- Yes it is. The chandelier plays an important role in the book, and supposedly there is actually a canal that runs underneath the Opera house, too, just like in the book and adaptations.(5 votes)
- In 1964, Marc Chagall painted the ceiling of the opera house. Look up a few paintings by Chagall. Do you think his style belongs in a place such as this?(3 votes)
- Eventhough I never seen Chagall's paintings in the Opera Garnier in real life, I do sense that in some way or another it fits. You should put it in context: '60 postmodernism legitimates the combination and appropriation of different styles and periods and even the building itself is allready in eclectic style. So in that sense it does fit. Pure formally and estetically it fits also in my opinion, it does contains that typical dreamy feel of Chagall, where figures float in the air. Just as they painted angels and cherubines on the ceiling in Second Empire Style, Chagall paints a similar dreamlike state. And then we didn't even got started yet on the decadence of Chagall palette. The important difference i guess is that Chagall turns to earthly fantasy and escapism while the Cherubines and angels are religiously legitimated, so we have a sense of modern day securalization there.(2 votes)
- Wasn't there a musical based off this Opera House? I can't think of the name.(3 votes)
- What is Garnier(1 vote)
- sorry kinda late but its a opera house. in paris hopefully this helps.(1 vote)
- At, I'm pretty sure that's a Rembrandt, not a Degas. i definitely remember a Rembrandt featuring the orchestra, with the scroll of the cello and the dancers in the same places. 3:02
Actually, Rembrandt lived almost all his life in Holland.
Could someone clarify this for me?(0 votes)- The painting you mention is by Degas. It is titled, "The Orchestra at the Opera" and is in the collection of the Musée d'Orsay in Paris:
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Edgar_Degas_-The_Orchestra_at_the_Opera-_Google_Art_Project.jpg(3 votes)
- between 13 and 36 seconds you mention Haussmann and Napoleon III, who actually commissioned the Paris Opera?(1 vote)
- Perhaps more a history than an art history question, but "who paid for it?" From whence came the wealth that is on display in the opulent architecture on display here? Was if funded by the French aristocracy, the taxpayers, income from the colonies in Africa and Asia? A lot was spent, whose was it?(1 vote)
Video transcript
(piano playing) Man: We're in The Paris
Opera by Charles Garnier. Now, this was a project
that was very much a part of Napoleon III's reconstruction of Paris with the help of Baron Haussmann
who was creating boulevards and a city of spectacle. Girl: Haussmann was hired to
really modernize the City of Paris to get rid of those old winding
streets to provide sewers, to bring light into the streets. The Paris that we see today
is very much the Paris of Baron Haussmann and Napoleon III. In fact, when we look from the
balconies of the Opera House we really see all of those broad avenues that remind us of impressionist paintings. Man: There's no question
that one of the great crowns of Napoleon III's reign and of Haussmann's reconstruction of Paris is
the work of Charles Garnier and the Paris Opera. Girl: It's unbelievably opulent. There's colored marble
and paintings and mosaics. Man: This is a second
empire style at its height. I think what's important to
remember of course is that this is a theatre, it was where the ballet where the opera was housed
until actually quite recently. Ballet still continues here
although the opera itself has moved. Of course, there's a grand stage. In fact, you can just hear the
orchestra practising as we speak. If you look at the roof line, you can see that there's a raised
area just the back of the dome. That's actually the pulleys for
raising and lowering the scenery that protrudes out of the top. That wonderful copper dome which
is now that brilliant green is a false dome and that
there's a second dome inside. Between those 2 domes is the
area that the great chandelier would be retracted into
during performances. That chandelier apparently
weighs something like 7 tons. Girl: You walk into this great
foyer and there's an enormous broad staircase with
chandeliers and engaged columns, plasters and a painted ceiling. Man: A kind of series
arabesques that speak to the 2nd empire style
especially this curvilinear nature of the staircase. The extraordinary, and as
you said, opulent spaces that are given over for
socializing before the performance, during the intermission
and after the performance is nearly as much as is given
over the stage, the orchestra and in fact the audience
in the theatre itself which is to say that the
front-half of this building is its own stage but it is
the stage of the 2nd empire. Girl: What it does is it
gives us a really good idea of how radical Degas
was by going back stage, by not showing us the public face, by showing us the rehearsal
rooms, the dancers waiting, their chaperone's waiting. Man: You're absolutely right. To understand the radically of Degas, one really needs to see the
front of the opera house. All the formality, all
the pump, all the ceremony is given over to this direct
observation of these figures in a far less than ideal position. Degas of course also painted
the front part of the house and he painted certainly
the stage on occasion. There are those other wonderful
paintings by Mary Cassatt of the woman in the balcony
of her sister for instance. That is another expression in the sense of the audience as show piece. Girl: The idea of giving
us the unusual view. One has a different perspective on
the radicality of that approach. Man: Although, I think Garnier
is a sense responsible for that. Because if for instance, we're
in the grand foyer at the moment. If you look, there are balconies
that give you very particular but very radical views of the space, variety of different angles. In the boxes, the theatre
itself is round around the back and the boxes are all giving
you probably 180 degrees of different angles. In a sense, the architecture is
speaking to these shifting positions. Girl: Providing that focus on
the individual bourgeoisie, upper bourgeoisie. Man: Yes. And the individual experience. Girl: And their point of view. Man: For instance, every
box has its own doorway. Every boxes rolled off from the other, it's got curtains to draw back. So there is this notion of the bourgeoisie and separate bourgeoisie experience. You're absolutely right. There's no question that the
entire building is in a sense, it is for music, it is
for the movement of dance, but it is really about seeing. (piano playing)