Main content
AP®︎/College Art History
Course: AP®︎/College Art History > Unit 1
Lesson 5: An introduction to art history- What is art history and where is it going?
- Introduction to art historical analysis
- How to do visual (formal) analysis in art history
- Art historical analysis (painting), a basic introduction using Goya's Third of May, 1808
- A brief history of representing the body in Western painting
- A brief history of representing of the body in Western sculpture
© 2023 Khan AcademyTerms of usePrivacy PolicyCookie Notice
A brief history of representing of the body in Western sculpture
Speakers: Dr. Steven Zucker and Dr. Beth Harris
. Created by Beth Harris and Steven Zucker.Want to join the conversation?
- , is there any significance to the feet of the female figure extending slightly below that of her male counterparts? 4:27(23 votes)
- I think that the elongation that many people have noticed emphasized grace in that era;thus, it was the way an artist could emphasize the beauty they saw in their subjects.(7 votes)
- The sculptures on the cathedral were presumably commissioned by someone with more money/power. I'm interested in the balance between the sculptor's personal preferences/ideologies and those of the commissioner's. Does anybody know how that dynamic might have worked in the Middle Ages?(3 votes)
- From what I understand, artists were viewed very differently in the Middle Ages than they are today.
The modern view is that artists are individuals with their own style, and their art is worth based on their talent. However, in the Middle Ages, artists were seen as craftsmen, and the value of their work depended mostly on the materials used in their painting. For example, a panel painted with lapiz lazuli and gilded with gold leaf would always cost more than one made with less expensive paints, no matter who made it. Artists, instead of having their own individual vision and style, would hew to tradition by looking at how previous artists painted something. The patron would order one Saint Francis and the painter would paint one Saint Francis in the way his forebearers had - that is why you see spades of indistinguishable Madonna and Childs in Medieval Art. (But keep in mind that this does not make Medieval art "inferior," it's just that society viewed it differently.)
But for the Renaissance, it was a different story - one time, the 60 year-old Isabella d'Este commissioned a portrait from Titian, but was so averse to the final product, she made Titian repaint her to look three times younger!(14 votes)
- So why is it that in the Ancient greece era stone was used while the Italian renaissance sculpture seemed to be constructed using bronze. Are the mediums of the sculptures based on the common materials found within a certain region or is it something else??(4 votes)
- While stone was often used for sculpture in Ancient Greece, many original works were also cast in bronze using the process of lost wax casting. In fact many of the Ancient Greek sculptures which appear in Art History textbooks are actually Roman marble copies of Greek bronze originals. I'm not sure that I quite answered your question, but wanted to point out that bronze, in addition to marble, was a common material used for sculpture in Ancient Greece.(5 votes)
- How do you tell the difference between art from the Renaissance period and the Classical period?(4 votes)
- These boundaries are flexible, and the "periodization" of history is done as much for the convenience of scholars as for the observers. "Classical" generally refers to ancient Mediterranean societies (particularly those of Greece and Rome). Renaissance came much later. There were hundreds of years and lots of geography in between. Mere dating and locating can solve much of the question for you.(4 votes)
- Does this mean there is a connection between ancient Greece's art and ancient European art?(3 votes)
- Because Greece is physically and culturally European, from ancient times, even to today, I guess the answer to your question must be "yes, absolutely yes."(4 votes)
- @, was the spear destroyed or stolen, or is that a question that has never been answered? 0:38(4 votes)
- I think that it was a statue of a man who happens to be a spear bearer, but does not show any actual spear, and is just about the man.(2 votes)
- What would a sculpture of the human body look like in the 21st century?(3 votes)
- It depends; many artists draw on the classical tradition, while others prefer heavy abstraction and use of innovative materials.
Just google "21st century sculpture" and you'll get all kinds of stuff :)(3 votes)
- Question: What do the sculptures represent? I realized the answer and I will put it up for anyone who sees this:
Answer: The earliest sculpture was probably made to supply magical help to hunters. After the dawn of civilization, statues were used to represent gods. Ancient kings, possibly in the hope of making themselves immortal, had likenesses carved, and portrait sculpture was born.(4 votes) - how is it naturalistic because you can see the bones, muscle, weight shift... if abstraction shows the same things(except they have clothes on)(2 votes)
- The abstraction ignores proportion. The figures are elongated - very tall and long, more than any real human is.
Also, in real life, you can usually see the shape of the body under people's clothes, such as the left knee in this sculpture of Donatello: http://www.artble.com/imgs/5/7/d/34976/donatello.jpg
But you cannot see this in Gothic sculptures. It's just stylized drapery.(4 votes)
- is there a defined evolution of figurative free standing sculpture from late Gothic to the high Renaissance?(2 votes)
Video transcript
- [Steven] Throughout history in the West, there's this tension, this conflict between naturalism and abstraction. And it goes back and forth. - [Beth] So what we
wanted to do in this video is trace some of that tension. We're going to begin by looking at an ancient Roman copy
of a Greek sculpture. So we're going back to the period of classical antiquity. The period when ancient
Greece and then ancient Rome dominated the Mediterranean, and dominated European culture. - [Steven] This is a sculpture by an artist named Polykleitos. It's called the Doryphoros, which just means the spear bearer. He would have originally held a spear. But the reason we're looking at it, is it's just this amazing representation of the human body, in a position that we call contrapposto. - [Beth] It's incredibly
naturalistic or realistic. Naturalism is word that art
historians use all the time to talk about the way that something looks close to nature. Similar to what we see
in the world around us. - [Steven] And in this case, we're looking at the proportions. The understanding of the
contours of the body, of the muscles of the body. An understanding of the
bones under the flesh. - [Beth] And how the body moves in space and how it distributes weight as it moves. And how that weight
shifts as the body moves. This is a complicated
understanding of the body, that gets translated into
this marble sculpture. That looks so life like,
we almost expect it to move and talk to us. - [Steven] Now clearly this was made by somebody who cared a lot about what the human body looked like, about the mechanics of the human body. This is based on careful
direct observation. And so here we have not only an artist but a culture that cared about science, that cared about human potential. - [Beth] And so those are good ways to describe the culture of
ancient Greece and Rome. - [Steven] So let's fast
forward more than 1500 years and to the town of Chartres,
just south of Paris, to a huge cathedral. And on the front of that cathedral are some very highly stylized figures that we call jamb figures. - [Beth] These are
attached to architecture. So immediately we notice
a significant change from the Doryphoros. The Doryphoros, the spear
bearer, was free-standing. In other words, we could walk around him. And that's important
because when the sculptor thought about rendering him, he thought about what it would look like from all points of view. But when you're sculpting something that's attached to the architecture, in this case to columns, the medieval sculpture,
because here we are in the Middle Ages. The sculptor thought about making the figures match the columns behind. So the figures are tall and elongated, like the columns behind them. - [Steven] When look at the Doryphoros, we get a sense of a man
who's really walking. Here we look at figures
that are not really in our world. They are high above us,
they are otherworldly. And they're not looking at us, they're not noticing things around them. They are symbols of the human body. - [Beth] We can say that
they're transcendent. That they transcend earthly existence. After the fall of the Roman Empire, what happens in Western Europe is the ascendance of Christianity. - [Steven] The human
body was less important than the spiritual sense. And so, the Christian art
often in the medieval period focused on ways of abstracting the body to create a symbol of the spirit, which of course by definition has no form. And so, it's not a surprise
that Christian artists then turned to this kind
of abstracted rendering. - [Beth] So what do we mean by abstracted. Well first of all the figures are tall and elongated like columns. They don't resemble a body,
so much as a columnar shape. You could also notice that
when we look at the drapery, the clothing that covers the figures, we don't have much of a sense of the body underneath the drapery. - [Steven] Instead there's
a real focus on pattern. And you see that in the drapery, you also see it in the platforms
directly below the figures. So there's this equating
perhaps of decorative beauty with the spiritual. - [Beth] Those decorative forms we can see in the beautiful wavy lines at the bottoms of their drapery. We could also say that these
figures lack a sense of weight. One of the things about
being a human being is that we have bodies. We move through space
and we have weight to us. And we sense that when we
look at the Doryphoros. He stands firmly on the
ground, he moves through space. But these figures have feet
that point slightly down. There's no way they could
really stand in this way. And so they have a
sense of weightlessness, that I think matches their
abstract transcendent qualities. - [Steven] Well also just
look at the proportions of the bodies. Look at the length of their legs compared to the length of their
torsos or their heads. There's nothing naturalistic about this. They are so elongated. But are these less beautiful,
are they less well done then the Doryphoros? They're just different,
the goals were different. - [Beth] It's not that
the artist is less skilled or somehow wanted to make the Doryphoros but ended up making these figures on the outside of Chartres Cathedral. These were an expression of the deep faith of the people of the Middle Ages. - [Steven] And so the
Doryphoros and the figures at Chartres are both spectacular but they are both responding to very different cultural needs. - [Beth] We can see that again when we move to the Renaissance. Now we're looking about
200 years or so later, at a sculpture by the great Italian Renaissance sculptor, Donatello. And here we are in the early
Renaissance in Florence and boy do we see how the
artists of the Renaissance are looking back, not to
the figures on the cathedral from the MIddle Ages, but
rather to ancient Greek and Roman art, like the Doryphoros. - [Steven] Note that
Donatello has stripped off virtually every stitch of clothing, just like the Doryphoros. This is not a rendering that is concerned with the patterning of drapery. This is about the mechanics and the beauty of the human body. - [Beth] Very much like the Doryphoros. Now we should say that
Donatello's not specifically looking back at the sculptures of Chartres and rejecting them. He's rejecting the ways that the artists of the Middle Ages
approached the human body. - [Steven] And in doing so,
Donatello is really embodying the idea of the Renaissance. Renaissance is a French
word which means rebirth. And it refers to a renewed interest in classical humanism. In this case, the rendering
of the human body. - [Beth] And a big part of the humanism of the Renaissance is
also just an interest in the secular world. An interest in the natural world. And art once again, becomes based on observation of the visual world. - [Steven] So the story is complicated. In the Renaissance, we have a return to an earlier kind of naturalism. And it gets even more complicated when you move into the modern world, where artists can choose between naturalism and abstraction
or any variant in between. And a great example of that is the 20th century artist, Giacometti. - [Beth] Giacometti had at his disposal a world of reproductions. In the 20th century, we
have images around us. We have a perspective on history that wasn't available to many generations and centuries of artists before. - [Steven] So when Giacometti
renders the human body, he's not seeking fidelity to nature. He's not trying to solve the problems that Polykleitos, the
sculptor of the Doryphoros was trying to solve. He can do that, he knows this is something that we're capable of. Instead, he's looking for
something more emotive, something perhaps more philosophical. He's looking to make that
body symbolize something. And in some ways, he is closer
to Chartres as a result. But he also knows what
the Renaissance did, he knows what the classical world has done and he's making very conscious decisions. - [Beth] Giacometti's
sculpting in the period after World War II. There are many reasons why Giacometti choose to return to this
kind of abstraction. But, you know what,
that's probably a subject for another video.