If you're seeing this message, it means we're having trouble loading external resources on our website.

If you're behind a web filter, please make sure that the domains *.kastatic.org and *.kasandbox.org are unblocked.

Main content

Data inferences — Basic example

Watch Sal work through a basic Data inferences problem.

Want to join the conversation?

  • aqualine tree style avatar for user kellen
    An easier way: Cross multiply, do 399 x 635k then divide all over 1500. the number in your calculator becomes 168, 910 which is closest to D
    (28 votes)
    Default Khan Academy avatar avatar for user
  • female robot grace style avatar for user StudyBuddy
    Honestly, with a calculator, I found it easier to just multiply the proportion(399/1500) times the population (635,000)
    (29 votes)
    Default Khan Academy avatar avatar for user
  • leaf grey style avatar for user Ari
    Will Sal take away the old SAT practice after January?
    (8 votes)
    Default Khan Academy avatar avatar for user
  • blobby green style avatar for user nancy bonin
    how do you know to set it up like that? 399 over 1500?
    (3 votes)
    Default Khan Academy avatar avatar for user
    • duskpin sapling style avatar for user Lin Gh.
      If we want to get more technical and forget about Sal's way of solving the problem, it's not really important whether it's 399 over 1500 or 1500 over 399 (although 399 over 1500 makes more sense) the important part is that when you know which belongs with what.

      1500 is with 635000, because both of them represent the whole group, so:

      133/1500 = x / 635000
      And to solve for x:
      133/1500 * 635000 = x (this is where 133/1500 * 635000 came from)

      Likewise, if you somehow decided to use 1500/133, then:
      1500 / 133 = 635000 / x (remember, 1500 and 635000 must be in the same level, in this case numerator)

      Solve for x:

      1500/133 * x = 635000 (first we bring x to the top by multiplying both sides by x)

      x = 635000 * 133/1500 (then solve for x, like a normal equation)

      And if you have noticed, both methods lead to 63500 * 133/1500, but the first one is easier (in this case) and makes more sense. In ratios and percents, we usually write part / the whole.

      Hope this helped.
      (15 votes)
  • leaf orange style avatar for user Xylca Zel
    Can we use a calculator for this part? Because that would make finding the answer super quick here.
    (9 votes)
    Default Khan Academy avatar avatar for user
  • blobby blue style avatar for user Nora Nguyen
    why is the example always easier than the task?
    (7 votes)
    Default Khan Academy avatar avatar for user
  • piceratops tree style avatar for user Chakshu Khanna
    At , Sal sir rounded off 399, but in case if the options are not too much ranging so is it ok to this ronuding off thing.
    (2 votes)
    Default Khan Academy avatar avatar for user
    • purple pi purple style avatar for user doctorfoxphd
      Yes. Notice that it says approximately, so you will have to round anyway.
      400/1500 = 0.2667
      399/1500 = 0.266
      That is a difference in the ten thousandth place, so you buy a LOT of time by rounding and you do not lose much at all in accuracy.
      The "real" answer using 399/1500 is 168,910
      and the estimated answer is 169,333.333
      The estimated answer they gave in the options is 169,000 with the closest contender 127,000 which is way too small to be tempting.
      So, your rounding doesn't cause you to lose anything, except extra seconds or minutes of messing around with the "real" numbers that are harder to work with.
      (5 votes)
  • blobby green style avatar for user tammy white
    Is every math question now formatted as a word problem?
    (2 votes)
    Default Khan Academy avatar avatar for user
  • blobby purple style avatar for user Ezra
    Is it just me that I calculate the numbers on a calculator without removing the 0s
    (3 votes)
    Default Khan Academy avatar avatar for user
  • starky tree style avatar for user IL Libr0
    Good thing that the digital SAT has a calculator.
    Surly saves us a lot of time...
    (3 votes)
    Default Khan Academy avatar avatar for user

Video transcript

- [Instructor] In a survey of a random sample of 1,500 residents aged 25 years or older from a particular country, 399 residents has a bachelor's degree or higher. If the entire county had 635,000 residents aged 25 years or older, approximately how many county residents could be expected to have a bachelor's degree or higher? All right, so we have this random sample. We randomly sampled 1,500 folks aged 25 years or older. We find out that 399 of them have a bachelor's degree or higher. So of our sample, 399/1500ths have a bachelor's degree. Now the entire county has 635,000 residents aged 25 years or older. So when they're saying approximately, so we're gonna estimate here, how many residents could be expected? Well, since this was a random sample, you would expect that the same fraction of the random sample, that that would be approximately the same fraction of the general population aged 25 years or older that would have a bachelor's degree or higher. So we could just take this fraction and multiply it times the entire population to have a good estimate of, or good expectation, for the total number of folks with a bachelor's degree or higher. So we could just multiply this. Now there's two things going on. We really just want to get an approximation, and the good is, we have multiple choices right over here, and these are fairly spread out, so we could round some of these numbers here to simplify this a little bit. So this is going to be approximately the same thing. 399 is awfully close to 400. So it's gonna be approximately 400 over 1500 times 635,000, 635,000, and that's approximately the same thing as, let's see, four over 15. If I divide the numerator and denominator by 100, times 635,000, 635,000. Let's see, I could multiply all of this out if I want, but this quantity right over here, that's gonna be, so this is what we're, if I could just, we could figure what that is, but once again, we're just approximating. So this is gonna be greater than, if I just made this a 600,000, and I'm just gonna do that, just 'cause it's kind of close to 635,000, and 15 goes into 600,000 nicely. So whatever quantity this is, this is going to be greater than four times 600,000 over 15. And once again, I went to 600,000, just to make my math a little bit easier, and because 15 goes into 600,000, nice and easy 'cause 15 goes into 60 four times. So if you divide the numerator and the denominator by 15, this becomes a one, and then this becomes 4,000. I'm sorry, 40,000. Instead of 600,000, you're at 40,000. So this boils down to, maybe I'll cross out this, this is 40,000. So it's gonna be four times 40,000, which is 160,000. So our approximation is gonna be greater than 160,000, and there's only one choice here that is greater 160,000. And if you were multiply this out, you would get even closer to 169,000.