Main content
Course: Art of the Americas to World War I > Unit 9
Lesson 2: Art of Mexico in the 18th and 19th centuries- The Academy of San Carlos
- Mexican Independence
- Ferdinand Deppe, The Mission of San Gabriel, Alta California in May 1832
- Manuel Vilar, Tlahuicole
- A new art for a new nation: Félix Parra’s Bartolomé de las Casas
- Velasco, The Valley of Mexico
- Velasco, The Valley of Mexico
- José María Velasco, The Candelabrum
- Costumbrismo
- Picturing Racial and Social Identities in José Agustín Arrieta’s Costumbrista Painting, La Sorpreza
- Coming of Age in Gutiérrez’s Costumbrista painting, La despedida del joven indio (The Young Indian’s Farewell)
- Retablo of La Mano Poderosa/The All Powerful Hand
© 2024 Khan AcademyTerms of usePrivacy PolicyCookie Notice
A new art for a new nation: Félix Parra’s Bartolomé de las Casas
A conversation between Dr. Lauren Kilroy-Ewbank and Dr. Beth Harris in front of Félix Parra, Fray Bartolomé de las Casas, 1875, oil on canvas, 263 x 356.5 cm (Museo Nacional de Arte, Mexico City). Created by Smarthistory.
Video transcript
(soft piano music) - [Lauren] We're in the
National Museum of Art in Mexico city, looking
at a large painting from the 19th-century
of a 16th-century friar. This is a heroic image. - [Beth] This painting by Felix Parra painted in 1875 is showing us the famous Dominican
friar Bartolome de las Casas, who wrote in the 16th-century,
a famous book called the Destruction of the Indies
that defended the indigenous peoples from the abuses
acted out against them. - [Lauren] Those abuses included the death of millions of indigenous people that happened in the decades after the Spanish conquest of 1521. - [Beth] This painting
is an academic painting of the late 19th-century. And what we're seeing here is, Bartolome de Las Casas standing in the center of the composition, this solid figure, his arms
crossed against his chest, his eyes looking up towards heaven, clutching a crucifix in his right hand. And what we're seeing is the
aftermath of the attack on an indigenous couple who have
come to an indigenous temple to honor one of their dead loved ones. - [Lauren] And in doing that, the husband is brutally murdered, the wife clings to the fryer for protection. This heroizes a Spanish friar, but is also, it's empathetic
to the indigenous population. They were treated so
brutally by the Spanish. And seeing elements that identify this as the traumatic aftermath of this moment on the left bottom of the composition, we see incense that's still burning, but that's been toppled over. We see a garland of
flowers with paper banners, that's falling down and tattered. We see columns that have been toppled. And of course the husband
whose body is splayed and due to foreshortening looks like he's coming out towards us. And there's blood running
down from his head. - [Beth] And all of this taking place within this architectural setting, borrowed from the architecture
of indigenous people. - [Lauren] He is just combining different peoples from across Mesoamerica and throughout time together to evoke this sense of
the pre Hispanic past. - [Beth] We refer to this
as an academic painting, the Academy advocates,
a style that's readable, that's based on the art
of classical antiquity of a high amount of finish
and polish, dramatic lighting. This is a kind of art that appealed to the masses in the 19th-century. But here in Mexico, it answers a call for a new kind of art that tried to reconcile with its violent past. - [Lauren] And the 19th-century in Mexican history is complicated. In 1821 we have independence. Eventually much of Mexican
territory is taken over by the United States in the
middle of the 19th-century. And then you have French
occupation of Mexico for a period of seven years in the 1860s. And then in 1867, it's like the second independence occurs, this
freedom from the French who have taken control
with Emperor Maximilian. And it's two years later
that there's this call for a national art, this art that looks to the Mexican past rather
than the Greco-Roman past. And so we begin to see
artists like Felix Parra who are looking to these
conquest narratives. - [Beth] Parra could have looked at indigenous people who are contemporary with him in
the end of the 19th century, who were living impoverished lives, but here chooses a subject from the past. It's safe at a distance to look at it. It doesn't force people in the late 19th-century to deal
with political reality. So it's a coming to terms, but in a way, not as honest as maybe
in the 21st-century, we wish it had been. - [Lauren] And of course,
while condemning the violence associated with the
conquest, it's certainly not condemning that the
conquest should have occurred. - [Beth] Right. The idea is that it was still
the right thing to do to Christianize the people who lived here. - [Lauren] Even if the violence was wrong. This painting was paired with
another one of his paintings that was done two years later that shows the massacre of Cholula, which was a moment in the
conquest narrative where the conquistador, Hernan Cortes
enters the city of Cholula and he demands luxury
items, gold and silver, and wants the people to side with him. But they refuse and in return, he massacres thousands of people. - [Beth] So this idea of condemning some of the acts of conquest, but not necessarily the idea of conquest. (soft upbeat paino music)