Main content
SAT (Fall 2023)
Course: SAT (Fall 2023) > Unit 11
Lesson 3: Writing: Grammar- Writing: Setting Up Ideas — Video Lesson
- Setting up ideas | Quick guide
- Writing: Strong Support — Video lesson
- Strong support | Quick guide
- Writing: Relevant Information — Video lesson
- Relevant information | Quick guide
- Writing: Sequencing sentences — Video lesson
- Sequencing sentences | Quick guide
- Writing: Transition Words — Video lesson
- Transition words and phrases | Quick guide
- Writing: Transition Sentences — Video Lesson
- Transition sentences | Quick guide
- Writing: Introductions — Video lesson
- Writing: Conclusions — Video lesson
- Introductions and conclusions | Quick guide
- Writing: Interpreting Graphs and Data — Video lesson
- Interpreting graphs and data | Quick guide
- Writing: Precision — Video Lesson
- Precise word choice | Quick guide
- Writing: Concision — Video lesson
- Concision | Quick guide
- Writing: Formal and Informal Language — Video Lesson
- Writing: Formal vs. casual language — Example
- Formal vs. casual language | Quick guide
- Writing: Syntax — Example
- Writing: Sentence Fragments — Video Lesson
- Writing: Sentence Boundaries — Example 1
- Writing: Sentence boundaries — Example 2
- Sentence fragments | Quick guide
- Writing: Subordination and coordination — Example
- Writing: Combining Sentences — Video Lesson
- Linking clauses | Quick guide
- Writing: Parallel Structure — Video lesson
- Writing: Parallel structure — Example
- Parallel structure | Quick guide
- Writing: Modifier Placement — Video Lesson
- Writing: Modifier placement — Example
- Modifier placement | Quick guide
- Writing: Verb Tense and Mood — Video Lesson
- Writing: Shift in verb tense and mood — Example
- Verb tense and mood | Quick guide
- Writing: Pronoun Clarity — Video Lesson
- Writing: Pronoun clarity — Example
- Pronoun clarity | Quick guide
- Writing: Pronoun Agreement — Video Lesson
- Writing: Pronoun-antecedent agreement — Example
- Pronoun-antecedent agreement | Quick guide
- Writing: Possessive determiners — Example 1
- Writing: Possessive determiners — Example 2
- Writing: It’s/Its Confusion — Video Lesson
- Confusion with "its" and "their" | Quick guide
- Writing: Subject-Verb Agreement — Video Lesson
- Writing: Subject-verb agreement — Example
- Subject-verb agreement | Quick guide
- Writing: Noun Agreement — Video Lesson
- Writing: Noun agreement — Basic example
- Noun agreement | Quick guide
- Writing: Frequently Confused Words — Video Lesson
- Writing: Frequently confused words — Example
- Frequently confused words | Quick guide
- Writing: Conventional Expressions — Video Lesson
- Writing: Conventional expression — Example
- Conventional expressions | Quick guide
- Writing: Logical Comparison — Video Lesson
- Writing: Logical comparison — Example
- Logical comparison | Quick guide
- Writing: End-of-sentence punctuation — Example 1
- Writing: End-of-sentence punctuation — Example 2
- Writing: Commas — Video Lesson
- Commas | Quick guide
- Writing: Semicolons — Video Lesson
- Semicolons | Quick guide
- Writing: Colons — Video lesson
- Colons | Quick guide
- Writing: Possessive Pronouns — Example
- Writing: Possessive Nouns — Video Lesson
- Making nouns possessive | Quick guide
- Writing: Items in a series — Example
- Writing: Punctuating Lists — Video Lesson
- Lists and punctuation | Quick guide
- Writing: Nonrestrictive and parenthetical elements — Example
- Writing: Nonessential Elements — Video Lesson
- Nonessential elements | Quick guide
© 2023 Khan AcademyTerms of usePrivacy PolicyCookie Notice
Writing: Shift in verb tense and mood — Example
Watch Sal work through a basic shift in verb, tense, and mood question from the SAT Writing and Language Test.
Want to join the conversation?
- suggest that the explanation also mentions that since something is being recommended, the form should have been: '...suggests that...should try' but that 'should' is omitted as it's redundant.(28 votes)
- "suggests" isn't it more like predicting? So why "will try" doesn't work?(15 votes)
- if you say will it is like you are forcing someone to eat the cake, when it is only meant to be a suggestion.(15 votes)
- I believe the answer should be,"should try". This is because the server is putting forth a personal opinion, and all of the answer choices imply an imperative sentence.(7 votes)
- Don't you think the examples are too basic?(6 votes)
- why the examples are simple but the ones on the practices are difficult i understand the concept but the words are to difficult.(5 votes)
- I don't understand why tried is incorrenct.(1 vote)
- Because its not in the past, it's currently happening. "The server suggests that all guests TRY ... " If you choose tried, you would have to change the whole sentence to past-tense.(4 votes)
- what if they dont like chocolate?(2 votes)
- If there was a should try answer would that technically be grammatically correct?(2 votes)
- I would have picked should try though it wasn't in the category for choosing.:((2 votes)
- Both "try" and "will try" are acceptable answers to this question depending on context. The question was written with the answer of try in mind, but depending on how the reader interprets the purpose of the sentence either answer could be reasonably expected. In terms of making a fair test there are problems with both using the word "server" and the SAT's execution of this question type.(2 votes)
Video transcript
- [Instructor] The server
suggests that all guests would try the homemade chocolate fudge cake. Now when I first read this,
and I have the word would here, when I see the server
suggested all guests would try the homemade chocolate
fudge cake, I'm expecting a, well, under what
conditions would they try? So I'm expecting to
see something would try the homemade chocolate fudge
cake if such and such happened. But that's not what they're telling us. What we're really saying
is that the server suggests that guests try the homemade
chocolate fudge cake. So I definitely don't wanna
keep it the way it is. If we said tried than that
would be the past tense. The server suggests that all guests tried the homemade chocolate fudge cake. Now that would imply that
the server's suggesting that in the past all
of the guests had tried the homemade chocolate fudge cake, but that's not the
intent of this sentence. He's, the server's
suggesting that people try the homemade chocolate fudge cake, so I'm gonna get rid of that one. And I keep saying it, and we
see that that's choice three. The server suggests that all guests try the homemade chocolate fudge cake. This is exactly what we want. The server is making a suggestion,
it's not a conditional, it's not something in the past. And then we can rule out
this last one, will try. This is kinda the server,
if we replaced will try, this would be the server
predicting something about the future which isn't
the intent of this sentence. The server suggests
that all guests will try the homemade chocolate fudge cake. So I think this one is off to. So definitely like that choice.