Main content
The spotlight model of attention and our ability to multitask
Visit us (http://www.khanacademy.org/science/healthcare-and-medicine) for health and medicine content or (http://www.khanacademy.org/test-prep/mcat) for MCAT related content.
These videos do not provide medical advice and are for informational purposes only. The videos are not intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. Always seek the advice of a qualified health provider with any questions you may have regarding a medical condition. Never disregard professional medical advice or delay in seeking it because of something you have read or seen in any Khan Academy video.
Want to join the conversation?
- there seem to be a minor mistake atusing AVCA to spell CAVE 2:15(56 votes)
- I just spent 5 mins trying to spell CAVA in my freaking head(38 votes)
- What is the difference between the spotlight model of attention and selective attention?(5 votes)
- Can you please explain the resource model of attention again? The explanation in the video wasn't very clear. Thanks(3 votes)
- We have a limited amount of resources we can expend when attending to something. Multi-tasking drains these resources much more quickly than when we focus on a single task.(4 votes)
- Okay...So what's the difference between the two?(4 votes)
- Hi, I was wondering why the correct answer to this practice question (below) was a change from English to Russian rather than change from non-taboo to taboo content. Wouldn't it be more noticeable if the language changed than if the content changed, since they weren't really paying attention to content in the first place?
Participants in an attention study are given a dichotic listening task. Which of these changes to the sound transmitted to the unattended ear will NOT be noticed in a majority of the participants?(2 votes) - In this case, does anyone know if listening to music has a bad correlation? Like should we listen to music while studying?(2 votes)
- Odd that I thought of "PEAT" and "PEAL" before "TAPE" and "LEAP"(1 vote)
- Interesting, I thought of "TAPE" and "PALE".(2 votes)
- I believe it is also important to be aware that while we may be practicing selective attention by focusing on one task, such as writing a paper, we should also consider our mental focus while completing a task. While writing a paper, how often does our attention mentally shift to other thoughts, ideas, and worries, without our intention? I felt that this should have been brought up!(1 vote)
- Can you explain how spotlight model of attention differs from Inattentional blindness?(1 vote)
Video transcript
- When we talk about selective attention, we are really talking about
focusing our conscious awareness on a particular stimulus,
or group of stimuli. And one way that we can think of this is using a metaphor of a
flashlight or a spotlight. So imagine that you're in a dark room, or a dark cave with a flashlight. You can really only see
what that beam of light is pointing at at any moment in time. The rest of the surrounding
area is still dark. And you can move that
flashlight beam around, and you can focus in on different things, but you can't illuminate
everything at the same time. And that is what selective
attention is all about. We take in a ton of information
about the environment from our five senses, but we don't consciously
process all of it. But when something in our environment is brought to our attention, we can swing our
attentional spotlight around to consciously focus on it. So before this very second, you probably weren't thinking about the feeling of your socks on your feet, or the pressure that your
chair puts on your back, or the sound of your computer fan. But now you probably are,
because I've mentioned it, and so you've shifted
your attention towards it. And this works for memory too, think back to one of your
lecture halls or classrooms, and think about how many windows it has. And you should know this, right? I mean, you see it every day, or every other day. But you probably don't remember. And it isn't because you didn't see it, it's because you didn't ever attend to it. However, even though we
can only consciously attend to a small amount of
information at a time, we know that a lot of other information is being taken in by our bodies. And we seem to be aware
of that information, at least at an unconscious level. And one example of this is priming. And priming is an effect
where exposure to one stimulus influences a response to another stimulus. And just to give you a quick example, you can probably solve these anagrams a lot faster than you
can solve these anagrams. And why might this happen? I mean, they're all four-letter words, they're all common words. But these words are more familiar to you, because you just heard me saying them when I was describing the
spotlight model of attention. Whereas I haven't mentioned
these words before. You are able to figure
out these first anagrams and not these second anagrams because you were primed for them. And the way that this relates to attention is that we often attend to information that we have been selectively primed for, even if we are not
consciously attending to it. And this can help to explain
the cocktail party effect, which is the phenomenon where
your attention is pulled by someone saying your name, even if they are across a room and you are engaged in a
different conversation. And take a moment to think about this in terms of priming. Because it turns out that
we are very practiced from a very early age to respond when our name is called. And so it makes sense that our name would be such a strong prime
for pulling our attention. The spotlight model of attention is similar to another model
that you may have heard of, and that's the resource
model of attention, which states that we
have limited resources when it comes to attention. Resources that are easily overtasked if we try to pay attention
to multiple things at once. And if you think about it, both the spotlight theory
and the resource model say something implicitly about
our ability to multi-task. Which is that we probably
aren't actually very good at it. And this has been suggested through a number of research studies. In one kind of task, a
dichotic listening task, A research participant
would wear headphones that would play something
different in each ear. The participant is then
instructed to focus on just one of the streams of information that they are being exposed to. Which is called the attended channel. While ignoring the information that's being presented to the other ear, which is called the unattended channel. And when people do this task, they have pretty good
recall for the information that's presented to the attended ear, but they are not able to
recall the information that was presented to the unattended ear. But let's take a minute to
think about multi-tasking and divided attention in terms
of something really serious, like talking on the phone
or texting while driving. And I'm sure that some of you, or maybe most of you, have answered the phone while driving, or maybe texted someone to let them know that you were running late. But applying the spotlight model, or the resource model
of attention to this, it might be that we're not
really mutli-tasking at all. Instead, we're shifting our attention from the road to our phone, and then back to the road. And you probably know by now that this actually results in a high number of car accidents. Which is why some states have even made the effort to ban talking on your cell phone
or texting while driving. But what about the things
that we typically consider to be less serious as distractors? Things like singing along to the radio, or talking to a friend
in the passenger seat. Do these things divide
our attention as well? And if so, are they as bad
as texting while driving? Studies have shown that three factors seem to have an influence when it comes to our ability to perform multiple tasks at once. The first one is task similarity. Think about listening to the radio while writing a paper. Would it be easier to listen
to an interview on NPR, or classical music? Well, because the interview
and writing the paper are similar tasks in that they both involve verbal processing, we would predict it to
be much more difficult to multi-task in that situation as compared to cases where
the two tasks are dissimilar. How difficult a task
is also has an effect. And texting while driving is in fact more difficult than talking
to a passenger in a car, or singing along to Journey. And this also explains a behavior that I have noticed in myself, which is that I usually have my radio on when I'm driving around my neighborhood, but I tend to turn it off or turn it down when I'm driving in an unfamiliar town. Because driving becomes a much harder task when I'm not really sure where I'm going, and it requires more of my focus. Another thing that can have an effect on our ability to multitask is practice. Activities that are very well practiced become automatic processes, or things that can occur
without the need for attention. So to stick with our driving example, have you ever kind of
zoned out while driving only to find yourself home? But you don't really
remember the drive there? Well, that's something
that tends to happen to practiced drivers, not new ones. Controlled processes, on the other hand, are those that we are
consciously aware of. And those are the tasks that
we would struggle to complete if our attention was divided. And one thing that
determines whether or not a task is automatic or controlled is how often we've practiced it. And while studies have shown that these three things can influence how well we're able to multitask, in general, most of the research has shown that multi-tasking is not as efficient as working on a single task, even if the tasks are relatively simple. And this is true when it
comes to learning as well. A number of recent studies have reported that high levels of social media use, so things like going on
Facebook and text messaging, is correlated with poor student grades. And of course, this is just a correlation, so we can't decide any causality to it. We really don't know whether spending a lot of time on Facebook
results in lower grades, or whether or not those
who do poorly in school are more likely to spend
more time on social media, or even if a third factor
is driving both of these. But even so, I think it's something that you might want to consider if you're a student. And I have to say that this is actually one of the things that I
really love about psychology, that we can apply so much
of it to our daily lives. And so really take a
moment to think about this and what it might mean for your behavior in terms of whether or not
you should do things like listen to music or watch
a show while studying. You can really get a lot out of this.