If you're seeing this message, it means we're having trouble loading external resources on our website.

If you're behind a web filter, please make sure that the domains *.kastatic.org and *.kasandbox.org are unblocked.

Main content

Electron carrier molecules

What are electron carrier molecules? What role do they play in metabolism? Learn how electron carrier molecules capture the flow of electrons from the breakdown of a fuel (e.g. glucose) to produce ATP.
.
Created by Jasmine Rana.

Want to join the conversation?

  • leaf green style avatar for user suh20h
    When you describe dehydrogenase..
    According to the equation of NAD and FAD, they combine with two hydride (Hydrogen with negative charge), right?
    if so, shouldn't electron will be 4e- instead 2e-?
    because one hydride have 2e- , so two hydride will be 4 e-...
    (3 votes)
    Default Khan Academy avatar avatar for user
    • blobby green style avatar for user jzeitoun
      No, here is why:

      NAD+ --> NADH
      - Dehydrogenase always removes 2H+ (hydrogen protons) and 2e- from the metabolite. NAD can accept 2e- but only a single H+. Therefore, the second H+ is donated to the solution.

      FAD --> FADH2
      - When dehydrogenase removes 2H+ and 2e- from the glucose metabolite, FAD can accept 2e- AND 2H+. Therefore no extra hydrogen proton needs to be donated to solution.

      The key point is that BOTH carriers, NADH and FADH2, carry 2e-.
      (13 votes)
  • aqualine ultimate style avatar for user Luke DeHart
    At minutes you posed the question "Why doesn't glucose spontaneously combust." The answer to it was stated later in regards to the activation energy but in the video it seemed like you were saying that it does not do it because it would create unusable energy. I understand the purpose here but reactions don't proceed or not proceed based on the the production of usable energy for the body. It seems nitpicky but that type of misconception can lead to confusion down the road. Other than that great video!
    (5 votes)
    Default Khan Academy avatar avatar for user
  • blobby green style avatar for user Peter Adeniyi
    how come the when FAD AND NAD+ receive electrons they don't become negatively charged?
    (3 votes)
    Default Khan Academy avatar avatar for user
    • leaf green style avatar for user Kevin James Tokoph
      NAD+ has a positive charge on the nicotinamide group in its oxidized and reduced form. The positive charge comes from the protonated nitrogen in the nicotinamide ring atop the ribosyl ring. When the proton and hydride are gained and aromaticity is eliminated, the nicotinamide component of NADH still has a positive charge. However, NAD+ has a net negative charge because of the ADP 2- group (at physiological pH), created by nicotinamide nucleotide adenylyltransferase. FAD is different. There is no single positive charge on FAD. The riboflavin ring never changes charge from neutrality, and the ADP 2- group created by FMN synthetase and FAD synthetase gives FAD and FADH2 a 2- net charge. NAD+ has a net 1- charge at physiological pH. The indicated + is a misnomer, but only used to illustrate the nicotinamide ring. We usually don't consider the adenylyl group, since it plays no role in electron transfer. The point: They have different charges, net negative charges, and the electron transfers create and destroy double bonds.
      (3 votes)
  • blobby green style avatar for user isaacheba
    it was mentioned that a hydride is made up of two electrons and one proton. but in the case of NAD and FAD, are we removing two hydride or is it just two protons and two electrons?
    (3 votes)
    Default Khan Academy avatar avatar for user
  • blobby green style avatar for user Sajjad Ahmad Alimi
    the Reaction produces (overall) 8 NADH+ H+ and FADH2, well this happens in a reaction NAD+ 2H+ +2e, so the when prodcuing 8 and 2 of thoe electron carriers we need 24 hydrogen, but glocse has only 12 hydrogens but where do these 12 hydrogens come from if it does ncome from glucose cause it simply doest have that many hydrogens, does it come from water that is used in krebs cycle or i dont know ..please help me
    (2 votes)
    Default Khan Academy avatar avatar for user
    • leaf blue style avatar for user Kevin D. Fettel
      They can be coming from a number of metabolic processes throughout respiration.

      They can come from the breakdown of water into a hydrogen (H+) and hydroxyl group (-OH). The hydrogen can also come from carbonic acid converting to H+ and bicarbonate.

      CO2 + H2O <-----------> H2CO3 <------------> H+ + HCO3-.

      Depending on the respiratory or metabolic state, it may be argued that the amino acids (pI vs pka) may also contribute H+.
      (2 votes)
  • female robot grace style avatar for user Colton Biehl
    It appears that many Life forms on Earth utilize the movement of electrons throughout the organism to create the energy necessary to continue experiencing Life. How do prokaryotes or single-cell Life forms harness the movement of electrons to maintain Life?
    (2 votes)
    Default Khan Academy avatar avatar for user
  • blobby green style avatar for user Lewis Riojas
    Where does electrons carrier come from?
    (1 vote)
    Default Khan Academy avatar avatar for user
  • leafers ultimate style avatar for user ff142
    At she says electrons are being oxidized but how can electrons be oxidized?
    (1 vote)
    Default Khan Academy avatar avatar for user
  • blobby green style avatar for user Linnea
    Why does it take 2 electrons away together with the proton? Why not only one?
    (1 vote)
    Default Khan Academy avatar avatar for user
  • aqualine ultimate style avatar for user Luke DeHart
    At minutes you posed the question "Why doesn't glucose spontaneously combust." The answer to it was stated later in regards to the activation energy but in the video it seemed like you were saying that it does not do it because it would create unusable energy. I understand the purpose here but reactions don't proceed or not proceed based on the the production of usable energy for the body. It seems nitpicky but that type of misconception can lead to confusion down the road. Other than that great video!
    (1 vote)
    Default Khan Academy avatar avatar for user

Video transcript

Normally when we talk about the production of energy in a cell, glucose and ATP are the main characters of the story. But in this video, we're going to talk about a behind-the-scene player called electron-carrier molecules that really do play a vital role in this energy-production process as well. But in order to talk about electron-carrier molecules, we need to first review the main character of our story. So let's start off with glucose. Glucose, which has the chemical formula of 6 carbons, 12 hydrogens, and 6 oxygens, we know is broken down in our body to produce energy. And specifically, this breakdown process is an oxidation process-- a process of losing electrons. And glucose is oxidized to carbon dioxide. And if the flow of electrons isn't very clear here to you, definitely review one of the previous videos on oxidation reduction from a biological viewpoint. But the key idea is to notice that this carbon is far more oxidized, or electron poor, when it is attached to highly electronegative oxygen molecule, than when it's attached to hydrogen. So that's the key idea here. Now in our bodies, this reaction does not take place in a single step. Instead, it takes place in many steps. And so I'm going to actually literally draw a staircase with many steps to indicate this. And I just want to note that this collective process of breaking down glucose in several steps is called cellular respiration, and that there are videos just devoted to the details of this process. Now we're ready to talk about our electron-carrier molecules. And we can think about our electron-carrier molecules a bit like a molecular shuttle. I'm drawing a picture of an actual shuttle here just to remind us of this analogy. At each step of glucose's breakdown or oxidation, a new breakdown product of glucose is formed that is given a fancy name of a metabolite. And just for short, I'm going to abbreviate the rest of these as "M." Now the key point to realize here is that as glucose is broken down, the metabolites are more and more oxidized. That is to say, they have less electron density. And this is where our electron carriers come in. So recall that energy is extracted from the oxidation process by harnessing the flow of electrons. And it is the job of the electron carriers to harness the electrons that are lost at each step of the breakdown process. And so I'm going to go ahead and draw a metaphorical shuttle for our electron-carrier molecule at each stage of glucose's breakdown. And these electron-carrier molecules are of course carrying the electrons that are lost from the oxidation process. Ultimately, all of these electron-carrier molecules are going to shuttle the electrons that are harnessed from the breakdown of glucose to something called the electron transport chain, which is in the mitochondria. And at this point, there are enzymes that can facilitate the transfer of these electrons to the final electron acceptor in our body, which is oxygen. And remember, it is this flow of electrons in the electron transport chain that allows the production of energy to produce ATP-- the cell's currency of energy. So another question that you might have is, why does the body such a complex mechanism that involves many steps and all of these electron-carrier molecules to fuel the production of ATP? Well, let's reconsider the chemical equation that describes the overall breakdown of glucose. So glucose combines with oxygen to produce carbon dioxide and water. And just so that we conserve our mass, let's put in our stoichiometry. This describes the overall breakdown of glucose. And we know that this reaction releases energy to fuel the production of ATP. Now another way to view this process is as a simple combustion process. And combustion is exactly what it sounds like. It's what you think of when you think of something burning. And a combustion process just requires a fuel. And in this case, our carbon rich or electron rich molecule of glucose can be considered a fuel. And it also requires molecular oxygen, which we also have here. So to reword the question that I just posed, why doesn't glucose, the fuel, spontaneously combust in one step, instead of being broken down into multiple steps inside our body? Let's first think about the consequences of combustion in our body if glucose spontaneously combusted in our body to produce a large burst of energy, likely in the form of heat. All of that would be unusable energy. It would be unusable because remember, the only energy that our body really is able to use is in the form of ATP. And luckily for us, this combustion processes does not take place in one step inside of our body. Because even though it is energetically favorable-- that is to say, it releases energy-- it is actually kinetically unfavorable. That is to say, it has a very high activation energy. And you know this actually intuitively, because the combustion or burning of sugar in food, only happens when you overcook something at a high temperature. And a high temperature is able to overcome the activation energy to allow this combustion process to occur. Now our bodies are, of course, at a temperature much lower than that needed for a combustion process, which is thankful. Because otherwise, we would be producing all of this unusable energy. Instead, our body overcomes the high activation energy of this reaction by using enzymes at each step of the reaction. So I'm going to abbreviate this here as "E." And there are two benefits of using a multitude of enzymes to break down glucose. The first benefit-- I'm going to write benefits of enzymes. The first benefit is that we're able to produce a large number of metabolites. And this is important, because it allows our body to essentially reshuffle all of the metabolic products into many different pathways, so that we can reuse and recycle these products as much as possible. And the second benefit of using many enzymes to break down glucose is that we have a slow and controlled oxidation of glucose, which allows us to harness all that energy, which is in the form of the electrons that are being oxidized in a very controlled manner. As opposed to the big burst of heat that we would get in a single-step combustion process. And electron-carrier molecules play a big role in this controlled oxidation process that is facilitated by enzymes, as you can see in our diagram above, because they are essentially serving as a temporary storage for all of the electrons that are being lost by glucose. And in fact, because of they're close association with the enzymes that facilitate the breakdown at each step, electron carriers are also called coenzymes. And coenzyme is exactly what it sounds like. It's a molecule or it's a chemical functional group that helps enzymes perform their function. Now the enzymes involved in the breakdown of glucose, for the most part, are in the class of enzymes that have a special name called dehydrogenases. And these dehydrogenase enzymes do exactly what their name implies-- they dehydrogenate the glucose. That is to say that they take away hydrogen. And when they're taking away hydrogens, they also take away electrons. And most often they do this by taking away two electron along with a proton, which is what chemists call a hydride. And this hydride has a negative charge, so it's often referred to the hydride ion. And just another way to think of this is as one proton plus two electrons. Now the two electron-carrier molecules are coenzymes that are most commonly discussed in the breakdown of glucose, are two molecules that go by the name of NAD and FAD. And I want to write down the reaction that occurs between these electron-carrier molecules and the electrons that they're accepting from the glucose molecule through this dehydrogenase enzyme. So first, it's notable that NAD has a positive charge in its most oxidized form, while FAD does not. And each co-enzyme reacts as two protons and two electrons each. In other words, reacting with a hydride ion plus an extra proton. And once the electron-carrier molecules accept the electrons in this way, they become reduced. And the reduction products are slightly different for each. In the case of NAD, it's reduced into NAD H. So notice that we only have one hydrogen. And the reason for that is NAD can only except to one hydride ion. On the other hand, FAD can accept both hydrogens, so it's reduced to FAD H2. The extra proton is just donated to solution in the case of NAD. And it is these molecules here-- these reduced form of our electron-carrier molecules-- that shuttle the electrons to the electron transport chain to allow for the production of ATP.