If you're seeing this message, it means we're having trouble loading external resources on our website.

If you're behind a web filter, please make sure that the domains *.kastatic.org and *.kasandbox.org are unblocked.

Main content

GMAT: Math 17

92-95, pg. 164. Created by Sal Khan.

Want to join the conversation?

  • blobby green style avatar for user joshmushlock
    Question #95

    I find the following method to be an easier way to answer this question. Start by finding out how many years it would take to qualify and then add it to her starting year to determine her year of eligibility.

    70 >or= 32+2Y and solve for y and add to 1986.

    32 is her starting age, and you get twice the credit for each year she works due to age and tenure.
    (15 votes)
    Default Khan Academy avatar avatar for user
    • piceratops ultimate style avatar for user Mark
      During the GMAT exam the way you describe would probably be more intuitive and faster, but Sal's method is mathematically more basic, which helps people during the learning stages, but requires several more steps to complete and leaves more chance for error when on a time crunch. I solved initially with your method as well, but am glad to see his as it might be useful on other problem types.
      (1 vote)
  • blobby green style avatar for user 23andaluzisabella
    Thank you, now I undserstand
    (1 vote)
    Default Khan Academy avatar avatar for user
  • leaf green style avatar for user Brendan
    Question #95
    Can't you just do 70=32+2x and solve for x? x=19 added to 1986 = 2005 being the first yeah of eligibility.
    (1 vote)
    Default Khan Academy avatar avatar for user
    • blobby green style avatar for user Jan.Hargrave
      Each year that the employee works for the company, she also becomes a year older. So, she gets 2 "years" credit for each year she is employed, one for the year that she worked and one because her age increased by a year. So, for example, she started in 1986 at 32 years old. In 1987, she would have worked 1 year, and she would turn 33, so her age plus her 1 year of employment would = 34. In 1988, she will turn 34 and she will have been employed for 2 years, so age + years employed would equal 36. The amount that counts towards her retirement goal of 70 is Age + Years of employment, so this amount increments at a rate of 2 per calendar year.
      (1 vote)
  • piceratops seed style avatar for user Pranav Singh
    A really easy and quick way to solve 95)
    a+y>or=70 so we essentially solve for a+y=70.
    When Age = 32, Years = 0 = 36 which is not equal to 70
    Simply add 10 to each side till you hit 70
    So at A=42, Y=10 which is equal to 52 which is not equal to 70
    At age 52, Y =20 which is 72
    So at age 51, Y = 19 = 70

    So from 1986, with 19 years of experience, the year would be 2005
    (0 votes)
    Default Khan Academy avatar avatar for user
  • blobby green style avatar for user hcps-smithbw1
    what is between 1/3 and 87/100 on a number line?
    (0 votes)
    Default Khan Academy avatar avatar for user
    • purple pi purple style avatar for user doctorfoxphd
      Well, I hope you are not still waiting for this answer. The fractional difference between those rational numbers is 161/300. So, if you change the two fractions to make equivalent fractions having a denominator of 300, 1/3 would be 100/300 and 87/100 would be 261/300. Now you can start listing just a few of the numbers between 1/3 and 87/100.
      So 101/300, 102/300 (same as 17/50), 103/300, 104/300 (same as 26/75), 105/300 (same as 7/20), 106/300 (AKA 53/150), 107/300, 108/300 (same as 9/25), ... 150/300 (AKA 1/2) ... 200/300 (same as 2/3), ... 225/300 (AKA 3/4)... and I have skipped over 140+ of the numbers in this list. And, if we choose even bigger denominators, we can get even more. Oh, and I forgot π/9, 0.85, 3/5, and 0.3879375, which is 3879375/10000000.
      And (√2)/2 and (√3)/3 and (√17)/7 ...
      In fact, there are an infinite number of numbers between any two points on the number line. If that doesn't give you a headache trying to imagine that, I don't know what will!
      (2 votes)

Video transcript

Problem 92. In a certain furniture store, each week Nancy earns a salary of $240, plus 5% of the amount of total sales that exceeds $800 for the week. Plus 5% of whatever is greater than 800 for the week. If Nancy earned a total of $450 in a week, what were her total sales that week? So she earns $450, so what was her 5% bonus part? So 450 minus 240, she got $210 bonus. So 210 represents 5% of her sales above 800. 210 is 5% of what number? So you could say 210 is equal to 0.05 times x, and x will be her sales above 800. So x is equal to 210 divided by 0.05, so 0.05 goes into 210, add some decimal points. That's the same thing as 5 going into, put the decimal point there, 21,000. So 5 goes into 21 4 times, 4 times 5 is 20, bring down 1. 5 goes into 10 2 times, 2 times 5 is 10. We're done. So her sales were 4,200, but that's not her total sales. Remember, she only gets 5% on her sales above 800. So she sold $4,200 more than $800 that week. So her total sales are going to be 4,200 plus 800, which is $5,000. And that's choice E. Next question, 93. They give us two lists. So that's list one, and they give it 3, 6, 8, and 19, and they give us list two, they say it's x, 3, 6, 8, and 19. It's actually the same list, except they have an x here. If the median of the numbers in list one above is equal to the median of the numbers in list two above, what is the value of x? So what's the median of this list? Since we have an even number of numbers, this would be the average of the middle two numbers, so what's the middle two numbers right here? The middle two numbers are 6 and 8, the average is 6 plus 8 divided by 2, it's 7. So the median is 7. So they're telling us that the median of this list is also equal to 7, so where can I put x so that the median doesn't change. Well what if x is 7? If x is 7, then this list becomes 3, 6, 7, 8, 19, and now the middle number, since we have odd numbers, is actually the middle number. We don't have to do any of this averaging business. So now the median is actually 7, if we place 7 there. So x equals 7. Choice B. 94. In a certain city, 60% of the registered voters are Democrat, and the rest are Republican. So 40% of voters. In a mayoral race, if 75% of the registered voters who are Democrats, and 20% of the registered voters who are Republicans are expected to vote for candidate A, what percentage of the registered voters are expected to vote for candidate A? In a mayoral race, if 75% of Democrats, so 0.75 Democrats are voting for candidate A, and 20% of Republicans, so plus 0.2 times the Republicans, are expected to vote for candidate A, what percent of the voters are voting for candidate A? So let's just express this in terms of the total voters. The Democrats are 60% of the voters, Republicans are 40% of, not the Republicans, of the voters. So 0.75 times the Democrats, the Democrats are 60% of the voters, so let's just substitute. 0.6 voters for D, so we get 0.75 times 0.6 of all the voters, that's the number of Democrats there are, plus 0.2 times the Republicans, Republicans are 0.4 times all the voters. And so let's see, what's 75 times 6? Let me just do the whole decimals, 0.75 times 0.6. 6 times 5 is 30. 6 times 7 is 42 plus 3 is 45. And we have one, two, three numbers behind the decimal point, so it's 0.45 of the voters plus, let's see, 2 times 4 is 8, and we have two numbers behind the decimal, so it's plus 0.08 times the voters. 0.45 plus 0.08 that's 0.53. You have 45 plus 8, is 0.53, or 53% of the voters are going to vote for candidate A, that's choice B. Problem 95. A certain company retirement plan has a rule of 70 provision that allows an employee to retire when the employee's age plus years of employment within the company total at least 70. So greater than or equal to 70. In what year could a female employee hired in 1986, this is interesting, 1986, on her 32nd birthday, first be eligible to retire under this provision? So let's say that y is equal to the year. Her age is going to be the year minus 1986 plus 32. That's her age, because she starts at 32, so if the year's 1986, we're just going to get her age as 32. If the year's 1987, we're going to get 1987 minus 1986, which is 1 year, plus 32, her age will be 33. So that's her age. Her years of employment are going to be the years minus 1986. So a plus e is going to be equal of this, and so that is equal to what? 2y minus 2 times 1986 plus 32 have to be greater than or equal to 70. Just so I don't have to multiply 2 times 1986, let's divide both sides of this equation by 2, and I don't have to change the inequality, because that's positive. So I get y minus 1986 plus 32 is greater than or equal to 70. So y is greater than or equal to 70, let me add 1986 to both sides, plus 1986, minus 32. So what's 1986 minus 32? That's 1954, 8 minus 3 is 5, 6 minus 2 is 4. What's 70 plus 1954? Plus 70, is 4, 5 plus 7 is 12, 1 plus 9 is 10, so 2024 is an acceptable year for her. 2024. And that is not one of the choices, so I clearly made a mistake. Let me see where I might have made a mistake. So a certain employee retirement has a rule of 70 provision that allows an employee to retire when the employee's age, age plus years of employment within the company total at least 70. In what year could a female employee, the fact that she's female shouldn't matter, a female employee hired in 1986 on her 32nd birthday, first be eligible to retire under this provision? OK, her age is going to be the year, whatever year we're talking about, minus 1986 plus 32. And then her years of employment are going to be whatever year we're talking about minus 1986, fair enough. So I have a year plus year, and I have two subtractions of my 1986 plus 32 is greater than or equal to 70. I divide both sides by 30-- oh, I see my mistake. Here, this stuff right here, where I divided both sides by 2, I divided only the left side by 2. That by 2, that by 2-- oh, I didn't even do that. 2 times 1986 divided by 2 is 1986, 32 divided by 2 is 16, 70 divided by 2 is 35. OK, so let me rewrite it here. That's what happens when you try to do too much at once. So I have y is greater than or equal to 35 plus 1986 minus 16, I just added 1986 to both sides, subtracted 16 from both sides. So this is equal to 1970, and then we have 35 plus 1970, so y has to be greater than or equal to 2005, which is choice C. And I'm out of time, sorry for that careless error, and I'll see you in the next video.