https://www.khanacademy.org/math/tesda-foundational-skills-bridge-program/x322e07246fdeb08b:literacy-2a/x322e07246fdeb08b:lesson-11-check-finished-work-against-the-instructions/v/checking-finished-work-against-the-instructions 2026-08-07T11:20:58.434105105Z Checking finished work against the instructions Tasks: a basic workplace simulation with a finished form or completed procedure. Written materials: the original procedure and order slip used as the checklist. Learners compare the result to the source, using the written instructions as the guide, and decide if it is correct or needs fixing. Fact vs. opinion: a short workplace note that mixes factual statements (times, counts, item names that can be checked against a source) with opinion statements (judgments, preferences, feelings). With the trainer present, learners sort each line into "fact — can check it" versus "opinion — cannot check it," then explain in one sentence why we compare finished work against a fact, not an opinion. Single short source, supported, low stakes — stays within the 2A bar. The learner also judges whether a source can be trusted before using it — checking who issued it, whether it is official or authorized, whether it is current, whether it applies to the task, and whether it agrees with another authorized workplace document. Clarice Fajardo video https://cdn.kastatic.org/googleusercontent/ZCdwTudJg6e6n-P2gsaUborP4izvMsGo71pvEVlX9dNYWcLXcP7VHkWpn2grt4TUP1KoJLQP9NswyHBuBLSFTBw Checking finished work against the instructions Tasks: a basic workplace simulation with a finished form or completed procedure. Written materials: the original procedure and order slip used as the checklist. Learners compare the result to the source, using the written instructions as the guide, and decide if it is correct or needs fixing. Fact vs. opinion: a short workplace note that mixes factual statements (times, counts, item names that can be checked against a source) with opinion statements (judgments, preferences, feelings). With the trainer present, learners sort each line into "fact — can check it" versus "opinion — cannot check it," then explain in one sentence why we compare finished work against a fact, not an opinion. Single short source, supported, low stakes — stays within the 2A bar. The learner also judges whether a source can be trusted before using it — checking who issued it, whether it is official or authorized, whether it is current, whether it applies to the task, and whether it agrees with another authorized workplace document. https://cdn.kastatic.org/ka-youtube-converted/j2R2tPsjDpE.mp4/j2R2tPsjDpE.mp4 163 Check finished work against the instructions https://www.khanacademy.org/math/tesda-foundational-skills-bridge-program/x322e07246fdeb08b:literacy-2a/x322e07246fdeb08b:lesson-11-check-finished-work-against-the-instructions/a/article-1-check-finished-work-against-the-instructions 2026-08-07T11:20:58.434105105Z Checking finished work against the instructions asks: a basic workplace simulation with a finished form or completed procedure. Written materials: the original procedure and order slip used as the checklist. Learners compare the result to the source, using the written instructions as the guide, and decide if it is correct or needs fixing. Fact vs. opinion: a short workplace note that mixes factual statements (times, counts, item names that can be checked against a source) with opinion statements (judgments, preferences, feelings). With the trainer present, learners sort each line into "fact — can check it" versus "opinion — cannot check it," then explain in one sentence why we compare finished work against a fact, not an opinion. Single short source, supported, low stakes — stays within the 2A bar. The learner also judges whether a source can be trusted before using it — checking who issued it, whether it is official or authorized, whether it is current, whether it applies to the task, and whether it agrees with another authorized workplace document. article https://www.khanacademy.org/math/tesda-foundational-skills-bridge-program/x322e07246fdeb08b:literacy-2a/x322e07246fdeb08b:lesson-11-check-finished-work-against-the-instructions/e/exercise-1-check-finished-work-against-instructions 2026-08-07T11:20:58.434105105Z Check finished work against instructions Tasks: a basic workplace simulation with a finished form or completed procedure. Written materials: the original procedure and order slip used as the checklist. Learners compare the result to the source, using the written instructions as the guide, and decide if it is correct or needs fixing. Fact vs. opinion: a short workplace note that mixes factual statements (times, counts, item names that can be checked against a source) with opinion statements (judgments, preferences, feelings). With the trainer present, learners sort each line into "fact — can check it" versus "opinion — cannot check it," then explain in one sentence why we compare finished work against a fact, not an opinion. Single short source, supported, low stakes — stays within the 2A bar. The learner also judges whether a source can be trusted before using it — checking who issued it, whether it is official or authorized, whether it is current, whether it applies to the task, and whether it agrees with another authorized workplace document. Jeffrey S. Simbiling exercise https://www.khanacademy.org/math/tesda-foundational-skills-bridge-program/x322e07246fdeb08b:literacy-2a/x322e07246fdeb08b:lesson-11-check-finished-work-against-the-instructions/a/article-2-verify-information-is-accurate-before-you-use-it 2026-08-07T11:20:58.434105105Z Verifying information is accurate before you use it Tasks: a basic workplace simulation with a finished form or completed procedure. Written materials: the original procedure and order slip used as the checklist. Learners compare the result to the source, using the written instructions as the guide, and decide if it is correct or needs fixing. Fact vs. opinion: a short workplace note that mixes factual statements (times, counts, item names that can be checked against a source) with opinion statements (judgments, preferences, feelings). With the trainer present, learners sort each line into "fact — can check it" versus "opinion — cannot check it," then explain in one sentence why we compare finished work against a fact, not an opinion. Single short source, supported, low stakes — stays within the 2A bar. The learner also judges whether a source can be trusted before using it — checking who issued it, whether it is official or authorized, whether it is current, whether it applies to the task, and whether it agrees with another authorized workplace document. article https://www.khanacademy.org/math/tesda-foundational-skills-bridge-program/x322e07246fdeb08b:literacy-2a/x322e07246fdeb08b:lesson-11-check-finished-work-against-the-instructions/e/exercise-2-verify-information-is-accurate-before-use 2026-08-07T11:20:58.434105105Z Verify Information Is Accurate Before Use Tasks: a basic workplace simulation with a finished form or completed procedure. Written materials: the original procedure and order slip used as the checklist. Learners compare the result to the source, using the written instructions as the guide, and decide if it is correct or needs fixing. Fact vs. opinion: a short workplace note that mixes factual statements (times, counts, item names that can be checked against a source) with opinion statements (judgments, preferences, feelings). With the trainer present, learners sort each line into "fact — can check it" versus "opinion — cannot check it," then explain in one sentence why we compare finished work against a fact, not an opinion. Single short source, supported, low stakes — stays within the 2A bar. The learner also judges whether a source can be trusted before using it — checking who issued it, whether it is official or authorized, whether it is current, whether it applies to the task, and whether it agrees with another authorized workplace document. Jeffrey S. Simbiling exercise