Main content
Mass spectrometry
In the analytical technique of mass spectrometry, atoms or molecules are ionized using a high-energy electron beam and then separated based on their mass-to-charge ratios (m/z). The results are presented as a mass spectrum, which shows the relative abundances of the ions on the y-axis and their m/z ratios on the x-axis. This data can be used to calculate the exact masses of the atoms or molecules in the sample. Created by Sal Khan.
Want to join the conversation?
Sal says mass spectrometry can be used to measure the abundance of isotopes of a certain element in nature. But when he says in nature does he mean in all of nature or just 'the nature of the sample'? If the former, then how can we make inferences of the abundance of isotopes in nature from a single sample? If the latter, is there any technique that chemists use to infer the abundance of isotopes in all of nature?(16 votes)
In statistics, we can go around, take samples, and make an inference from it.
Whenever we take a random sample in nature & use mass spectrometry, we are finding the percentage that different isotopes occur in a sample of that element.
If we just take one sample & use the percentages from that one sample, then I would think that isn't the best inference for all of nature, though we can still make a claim for it.
Though I obviously did not find the relative abundances of the elements myself, here is what I have done.
Take multiple samples, use mass spectrometry to to find the relative abundances of each isotope, and then write that down.
Continue this process for n=K samples, & then I can calculate the mean relative abundances for each isotope.
If K (our number of samples) is small then we wouldn't be as accurate as if we take more samples.
If anything I said here is incorrect, please someone let me know. I don't have experience using mass spectrometry so I don't actually know the process they used, but from my experience in AP Statistics that is the type of process we would use.
Hope this helps,
- Convenient Colleague(23 votes)
This is probably way too advanced of a question
But how do we guarantee that the electrons we shoot will knock off the electrons of the atoms? Electrons are very tiny, aren't we just gonna miss? Also, what if some of the electrons we shoot end up joining the atom to form negative ions?(4 votes)
When we ionize a sample in MS, we bombard it with quite a lot of electrons. So even if most of the electrons we fire from the electron source miss the target, enough are making contact for us to be able to measure it in MS.
The electrons that we fire are of a high enough energy (~70 eV) that they ionize a sample by knocking existing electrons from the sample rather than simply add to the neutral species to create anions. In either case though whether we produce positive cations or negative anions, we can still detect them in MS since they are charged. Hope that helps.(17 votes)
At3:48, Sal says that you have to make the appropriate adjustments based on the charge of the ions. I don't understand how the charge of the ions will affect the mass of the different isotopes in any way. Aren't the masses of electrons so low that they don't affect the mass of the ions?(5 votes)- In the mass spectrum, the x-axis is not simply the atomic mass of the ions, rather the mass-to-charge ratio of the ions, or M/Z. If the charge of the ions is +1, then Z = 1 and the ratio is M/1, or simply just the mass of the ions. But if the charge of the ions is +2, then Z = 2, and the ratio becomes M/2, which gives us half of the ion’s mass. So, the adjustment we would have to make is multiply the M/2 by 2 to yield M/1 or simply just M.
Hope that helps.(8 votes)
How do we know that most of the elements will have the same charge after they get bombarded by electrons? Does the beam knock off every single electron in the atoms, so that they have no electrons? Otherwise, why would the charge be predictable?
If some atoms end up having a different charge after bombardment by electrons, then the particular isotope that is represented by the mass to charge ratio would be hard to identify on the x axis. Suppose for example the mass is 4 and the charge is 2+, that wouldn't be distinguishable from a mass of 2 and a charge of 1+, right?(3 votes)- Good question. It requires energy to remove electrons from atoms or molecules in MS. Since it takes more energy to remove more than one electron from your sample particles, most cations produced in the ionization chamber carry a +1 charge. There will be a small number of atoms or molecules with a +2 charge but they will be too small to make much an impact on the results.
And yes you are correct since the MS only records a mass to charge ratio, m/z, those two ions would be indistinguishable on the spectrum.
Hope that helps.(7 votes)
when you says in nature does he mean in all of nature or just 'the nature of the sample'? If the former, then how can we make inferences of the abundance of isotopes in nature from a single sample?(4 votes)- In statistics, we can go around, take samples, and make an inference from it.
Whenever we take a random sample in nature & use mass spectrometry, we are finding the percentage that different isotopes occur in a sample of that element.
If we just take one sample & use the percentages from that one sample, then I would think that isn't the best inference for all of nature, though we can still make a claim for it.
Though I obviously did not find the relative abundances of the elements myself, here is what I have done.
Take multiple samples, use mass spectrometry to to find the relative abundances of each isotope, and then write that down.
Continue this process for n=K samples, & then I can calculate the mean relative abundances for each isotope.
If K (our number of samples) is small then we wouldn't be as accurate as if we take more samples.
If anything I said here is incorrect, please someone let me know. I don't have experience using mass spectrometry so I don't actually know the process they used, but from my experience in AP Statistics that is the type of process we would use.
Hope this helps,
- Convenient Colleague(5 votes)
- At1:36, Sal says that the atoms are ionized so that they can pass through an electric plate. He says that the purpose of the electric plates is to accelerate their speed. Why does the speed of the ions need to be accelerated? Another question — why are heavier atoms deflected less, as Sal says at1:58?(1 vote)
- The whole point of mass spectrometry is to separate ions based on their mass. Ions need to be accelerated or else they wouldn't be able to reach the detector at the end of the spectrometer. For mass spectrometry to work the ions need to enter the magnetic field with velocity.
When they are accelerated and pass through the magnetic field they are deflected based on their masses. We need this or else we wouldn't be able to sort out ions with the same charge but different masses. Ions with higher masses have higher inertia and therefore require more force to change their direction of motion, and vice versa for ions with lower masses. So if the magnetic field is held constant then ions with a lot of mass and inertia will therefore be slightly deflected, while ions with less mass and inertia will be deflected to a higher degree.
Hope that helps.(7 votes)
- Is there chemistry in middle school level ?(2 votes)
- Anyone can begin learning chemistry whenever they feel prepared to do so. There isn't a single age to begin learning it.(4 votes)
i don't get it, doesn't this just changes the electrons in the sample? where does the neutrons come from? do they attach to each other depending on their charge?(3 votes)
Because isotopes exist. Zirconium has 5 natural isotopes, each of these atoms have different numbers of neutrons so has a different mass.(1 vote)
I don't know what bro is running on, but here's some coffee for Richard to fill up his energy☕(3 votes)- Spectroscopy and Spectrometry are not basically the same thing. Spectroscopy measures light wavelengths to determine chemical composition. Spectrometry has to do with mass and isotopes.(2 votes)
- Sal just said that sometimes people refer to mass spectrometry as mass spectroscopy, and use the two as synonyms. Even though it's not correct, mass spectroscopy is used in place of mass spectrometry sometimes.
So you are correct that spectroscopy and spectrometry are different, but the difference is the the use of light in spectrometry and not in spectrometry.(3 votes)
3:48Video transcript
- [Instructor] In other videos, we have talked about the idea that, even for a given element, you might have different
versions of that element, and we call those different
versions isotopes. And each isotope of an element can have a different atomic mass. And that stems from the idea
that, if it's a given element, it's going to have the
same number of protons, but you could have a
different number of neutrons. Now one question that you might
have been asking yourself is how have chemists been able to figure out what the various isotopes
of an element are and their relative abundance? What percentage of an element that we find in the universe is of isotope A versus, say, isotope B? And the answer to your question is they use a technique known
as mass spectrometry. I can never say it
right, mass spectrometry. Sometimes you'll hear the
word mass spectroscopy, and they're essentially
referring to the same idea. And what this technique is, is that you put a little bit
of a sample right over here, let's say we're talking about
zirconium in this example, and you heat it up. So you have it, you have a bunch of the
zirconium floating around, and then you beam it. You will bombard it with
a bunch of electrons. And what the electron bombardment does is, it can knock off electrons
from the atoms in your sample, and it can ionize them. And by ionizing some of your
atoms, they now have charge. And because they have charge, they can be accelerated
through these electric plates. So now you have these ions,
in this case, of zirconium, moving quite rapidly through this chamber, and then they enter into a magnetic field. And a magnetic field, a
strong magnetic field, can bend the path, can
deflect ions with charge. For a given charge, the force of the deflection
will be the same. But if you have a larger mass, you're going to be deflected less. And if you have a lower mass, you're going to be deflected more. And so what you see here are the different isotopes being
deflected different amounts as they go through the magnetic field. And then you have the detector. And at different points of the detector, you will detect each of these isotopes. And the more ions that hit a
certain part of the detector, that means that, hey, I have more of that type of isotope in nature. And then from that, you can generate a chart
that looks like this, where you see, on the horizontal axis, sometimes you'll see
it labeled atomic mass. And here, it's in unified
atomic mass units. And you can see, when
you put the zirconium through the mass spectrometer like this, you get a little bit that
has a mass number of 96, you have a little bit more
that gets a mass number of 94, 92, 91, and most of the
zirconium, over 50%, has a mass number of 90. Now in other cases, you won't see it just
in terms of atomic mass, given in unified atomic mass units. Sometimes in this horizontal axis, they'll give it in terms
of mass-to-charge ratio, where mass is the mass, but then charge is essentially
the charge of the ions. Now in a case where your charge is one, for example, if you knock
one electron off of the atoms and you have a plus-one charge, well, then the mass-to-charge
ratio would be the same thing as atomic mass measured in
unified atomic mass units. If your ions have a different charge, well, then you would have to make the appropriate adjustment. But in introductory chemistry class, most of the time you will get things in terms of just straight-up atomic mass. If you happen to get something
in terms of mass to charge, just make sure that if the
charge is, say, plus two, that you make the appropriate
adjustment for the masses. But this right over here will
tell you the various isotopes, and it will tell you its abundance. And it all comes from this
process of ionizing those atoms, speeding them up, deflecting
them through a magnetic field. And the ions that have a
higher mass-to-charge ratio will be deflected less, and the ions that have a
lower mass-to-charge ratio will be deflected more. And you can use that information
to make a graph like this.