If you're seeing this message, it means we're having trouble loading external resources on our website.

If you're behind a web filter, please make sure that the domains *.kastatic.org and *.kasandbox.org are unblocked.

Main content

5 human impacts on the environment

Hank presents examples of how human activity can affect ecosystems. Created by EcoGeek.

Want to join the conversation?

  • leafers tree style avatar for user ErikJahveed
    i have researched the possibility of insect eating as a hyper efficient and healthy source of food. Why don't we do this?
    (7 votes)
    Default Khan Academy avatar avatar for user
  • blobby green style avatar for user kfrain
    What about positive effects humans have on the environment?
    (5 votes)
    Default Khan Academy avatar avatar for user
  • mr pink red style avatar for user rose
    If the large amount of deforistation is causing there to be a large amount of CO2 in the environment,why don't they replant the forests after they have harvested the wood so that there is a cycle going on that would mean the amount of CO2 didn't change because the trees wouldn't be gone permanently?
    (3 votes)
    Default Khan Academy avatar avatar for user
    • duskpin ultimate style avatar for user Dayzha
      We definitely do now. It's required by law in some areas actually. That's a great idea and connection though. For example, if a mall is to be built on a plot land that was previously forested, it's required to have a certain amount of trees set up around the outside of the mall that are well cared for. That's why, I believe, you see trees as decoration outside on meridians and around the buildings.
      (5 votes)
  • leafers ultimate style avatar for user jzou1
    Can we make a type of artifical ice that's very close to actual ice? So that artifical ice could be global warming resistant, which could slow down the rise of the sea level.
    (4 votes)
    Default Khan Academy avatar avatar for user
  • starky ultimate style avatar for user Eoin
    why is global warming now called climate change?
    (2 votes)
    Default Khan Academy avatar avatar for user
    • piceratops ultimate style avatar for user betterpi3
      Global warming as a name only really describes one part of the change that is happening. Although average global temperatures are increasing over a large time scale, climate change can better capture the change in wind patterns, which creates changes in precipitation patterns and makes certain areas cooler while other areas become warmer. Also, one hypothesis about the effects of global warming on weather is that it will not just make most days hotter, but that it will increase the frequency of extreme weather events (blizzards, hurricanes, tornadoes, droughts, heat waves, really cold spells). If you heard "global warming" you wouldn't expect the coldest day of winter to be colder than normal, but "climate change" does show all these different aspects of the changes taking place in the atmosphere because of the increase in carbon dioxide concentrations.
      (5 votes)
  • purple pi purple style avatar for user Anna K.
    What impact will occur in the Earth if most of the human population went vegetarian? Will it be for the better, or will it mess with the food chain? I'm considering going vegetarian and would like to know if it will make a impact for the better upon the Earth?
    (1 vote)
    Default Khan Academy avatar avatar for user
    • duskpin ultimate style avatar for user Chloe Atallah
      If most of the human population were to go vegetarian, especially all of a sudden, yes there would be a huge mess with the food chains and severe issues of overpopulation for any animals we breed for food. There would also be the issue of what would have to be done with these animals, whether they would be released to the wild after generations of domestification which made them unable to survive on their own. The changes in these animals' populations would also greatly influence those of any animals that would prey on them (increase - which could lead to overpopulation and the downfalls of that) or be preyed on by them (decrease - maybe extinction in major cases). Considering that most of the animals we do breed for food are vegetarian themselves it is likely that due to their large numbers they may run out of grass to feed on, and therefore start dying of starvation. Needless to say, having a bunch of dead cows lying around isn't all that favorable for anyone.
      On the up side, all resources currently being used for the meat industry will no longer be used up for it. They could then be used for agriculture instead. The meat industry also takes up much more physical land than agriculture does, and eating meat can increase the spread of disease since many pathogens are spread through the meat, the animals, and all their waste.
      Oh, but any businesses centered around the meat industry will also die out pretty quickly, resulting in a whole lot of people unemployed.

      However, as far as your own decision to become a vegetarian, I would definitely encourage you to do so. It is not only very very healthy for yourself, but has the benefits towards the environment of being vegetarian (though on a much smaller scale concerning just one person-but don't let that hold you back), without most of the downfalls. The problems I mentioned would mainly be the result of a worldwide anti-meat revolution. What would easily reduce these effects is simply taking the steps much gradually, with people changing bit by bit into a lifestyle and diet that incorporates less meats, if not none at all.
      (3 votes)
  • aqualine ultimate style avatar for user Ayushi Sharma
    Are greenhouse released in any other ways than burning fossil fuels?
    (1 vote)
    Default Khan Academy avatar avatar for user
  • piceratops ultimate style avatar for user Christian Laube
    At Hank talks about the effects of overirrigation and how the salt in the water builds up in the soil, but if that is so how is it possible that in egypt irrigation has been used for thousands of years as the main source of watering crops and as it looks seems to be still working?
    (1 vote)
    Default Khan Academy avatar avatar for user
  • purple pi teal style avatar for user Umang Gill
    Is there still a way to stop desertification and still have water to drink? And is there a way the desert sizes will also be able to decrease?
    (1 vote)
    Default Khan Academy avatar avatar for user
  • aqualine ultimate style avatar for user yashy
    how does taking one organism in the ecosystem affect all? What does he mean by 'lush ecosystems' at ?
    (1 vote)
    Default Khan Academy avatar avatar for user

Video transcript

- At this point, people have been studying the impacts that humans have had on the world around us for a solid 50 years, and while it's hard to get a handle on exactly how the choices we make every day affect the environment, there is no question that our lifestyles, our cars, our need for more farmland, and our love of all kinds of plastic stuff are putting the hurt on ecosystems all over the world. Human activity all by itself, just people doing what they do could be responsible for the extinction of nearly 1000 plant and animal species to date, most of them over the last century, and even if you don't particularly care about the Barbary lion or the Saint Helena olive or the passenger pigeon or anything else we've driven into extinction, the thing is, we need these other organisms. The ecosystems of the world are working very hard for us every day, filtering water, sucking carbon dioxide out of the air, producing all the food we eat, all very important ecosystem services, benefits that the natural world provides us for free. So having ecosystems and keeping them intact is important, not only for the organisms who live in them but also for us, the animals who rely on them for thousands and thousands of things that we could never do for ourselves. Over the next two episodes, we're gonna look at these systems and how our actions are affecting the ecosystems that we need for our survival. Basically, we are messing up the environment six ways from Sunday but to make it easy on ourselves, let's start with the top five. (upbeat music) We've all been hearing about all the different ways that our behavior is affecting the biosphere, extinctions, climate change, deforestation, acid rain, desertification, pollution, and more, but you're asking, oh, well, why are all these things bad, what's going on, how is this stuff turning the earth into sausage, I don't understand. Well, I do understand, which is why I'm qualified to make this video, so let me lay it on you. The services that ecosystems provide for us, all the dirty work they do, could be broken up into four different categories. There are things that we could never ever ever duplicate or work around no matter what kind of smarty-pants technology we come up with. First, healthy ecosystems provide support services that create and replenish the foundation of the earth's biological systems. These services include recycling all of the compounds that are necessary for life through the carbon, water, nitrogen and phosphorus cycles. They also include other processes we've talked about before like forming new soils and producing atmospheric oxygen. Some ecosystems contribute more to these services than others, but none of them can get these basic jobs done unless they are intact. Two, ecosystems also perform provisioning services, getting us the raw materials we need to live, like the ocean provides food in the form of fish sticks and stuff, and rivers and aquifers and other freshwater sources give us water. Plants and animals also yield all kinds of fiber that we use for clothing and shelter and all around us, we find sources of fuel, whether it's biomass in the form of grasses or wood, hydropower in the form of flowing water, whether the carbon locked in millions of years old trees that we're now re-releasing into the atmosphere, but I'm getting ahead of myself. Ecosystems also perform super important regulating services, moderating many of the earth's systems that can get dangerous if they get out of whack. Like as we learned in biology, fungi and other organisms take on the task of decomposing dead things and poop. Meanwhile, plants help filter the water you drink and the air you breathe and provide flood control and they also absorb all that carbon you exhaled and that your car belches out, which in turn helps regulate the climate, and finally, number four, ecosystems are just kind of awesome. It's nice to be surrounded by happy plants and critters doing their business. Nice robust ecosystems give us places to play, scenes to inspire us and things to just discover and learn about. These are their less tangible but still important cultural services. An interesting thing about ecosystem services is that economists actually can and do calculate the monetary value they provide for humanity. If, for example, we had to do all of the things that ecosystems do for us, it would cost us $46 trillion per year, which is a lot considering that the output of the global economy is $66 trillion per year, so yeah, we should be happy that we don't have to pay for that. But you'll notice that I keep saying that ecosystems can only serve up all this awesome sauce if they are intact. By that, I mean they specifically have to have their biodiversity intact, because ecosystems are just a bunch of living and nonliving things working together, so unless their living parts are healthy, they're basically just rocks and weather. The main reason biodiversity is so important is that it makes ecosystems more resilient to that never-ending change we talked about a few weeks ago. Ecosystems with high biodiversity are way more resilient to disturbances than those with low biodiversity. In a high biodiversity system, if you take one species out of the mix, it's less likely that the ecosystem will collapse. Take a hectare of Amazonian rain forest. In that little patch of land, there are more different species of plants and animals than there are in all of Europe. Some of those species of insect goes extinct, there's less risk that the whole house of cards will fall than say in the Sonoran Desert, where there are very few organisms, so the disappearance of one species could effect the entire ecosystem. So the best way to understand our impacts on the environment is a through how we affect biodiversity. Unfortunately, it turns out that we've been doing a really bang up job of endangering some of the highest biodiversity ecosystems on the planet. In some cases, we are having impacts on the organisms themselves directly. In other cases, we are affecting biodiversity indirectly by creating one or two changes in that ecosystem that cascade into all kinds of problems for living things. First, let's look at that hectare of Amazonian rain forest again, because even though it's one of those super resilient ecosystems, we're having a serious impact on it. How? Well, first, by removing a lot of what makes a forest a forest, trees. According to some estimates, we're clearcutting around 8000 hectares of trees a day to provide land to graze cattle on and to harvest wood to make coffee tables or whatever. When you cut down a hectare of rain forest, suddenly a place where a few thousand species used to live turns into a place where just a handful of species live, some grass and weeds, maybe some rats or mice, some insects and you know, some cows, 'cause man, we love cows. And when you take out so many of the living things on that hectare of land, a bunch of things happen. For starters, you're not just affecting that ecosystem, but neighboring ecosystems as well. For instance, all of those trees that were cut down provided the service of regulating the flow of all that rain that rainforests get, not only by absorbing some of it, but also by slowing down runoff, letting the water seep into the soil before slowly making its way into streams and rivers and ultimately the ocean. But when those trees are gone, the water hits the land and shoots off into the nearest tree and causing erosion and washing minerals and chemicals all the way to the sea, where it affects marine ecosystems and when I say affect, I don't mean in a good way. This, my friends, is what's called a cascade effect. In this case, caused by deforestation, one of the most obvious of observable human impacts. In addition to causing more flooding and changes in water quality, deforestation on a larger scale can lead to another impact, desertification, where the spread of dry, unproductive landscapes. But cutting down trees doesn't automatically turn a forest into a desert. Desertification is driven along by additional factors, like overgrazing by cattle and over-irrigation. So how can overwatering something make it turn into a desert? Well, when we use groundwater to irrigate crops, the natural salts in the groundwater build up in the soil, eventually making it so salty that nothing wants to live there. Over time, fertile land near desert ecosystems become overtaxed and the desert spreads, and this is exactly what has happened in China over the past century where overgrazing and the city's unquenchable thirst for water have caused the Gobi Desert to grow by 3600 square kilometers every year. Now, these two impacts by themselves clearly limit the biodiversity of otherwise lush ecosystems, but because they also result in fewer trees that provide the all-important services of releasing oxygen and absorbing the CO2, you know what domino's gonna fall next, the climate, carbon dioxide, the principal greenhouse gas. It insulates the earth, so it stands to reason that the more CO2 there is in the atmosphere, the warmer the earth will be, and the thing is, we're reducing the size of forests at the same time as we're unleashing all kinds of greenhouse gases by burning fossil fuels. This double whammy is much of what's driving global warming. As a result, we are seeing decreases in the levels of polar sea ice, which means less habitat for polar bears, seals, and sea birds. More temperate animals are moving closer to the poles and the hotter, dryer conditions are causing more grass fires and forest fires. And while the climate has changed many times in the past, those changes usually took place over centuries or even millennia, giving organisms time to adapt or move. These changes are taking place within our lifetimes and it's kind of a huge deal and it's complicated and it'd take me at least like 10 minutes 52 seconds to explain it all in detail, which is why I did that in another video. By now, hopefully you can see how one human impact can lead to another, and how even indirectly, they can end up reducing biodiversity, but it's hard to overlook the more immediate impacts we can have on ecosystems. One of the most in-your-face ways we affect biodiversity is by introducing non-native species, either intentionally or unintentionally. Again, there are so many examples of this that you can learn more about in another video I did, but suffice to say, whether it's kudzu with North America or cane toads in Australia, invasive species have a knack for outcompeting or outright eating native species to the point that it rocks the world of an entire ecosystem, and finally, probably the most direct impact we have on biodiversity is simply overharvesting certain organisms. We're overfishing the oceans to meet growing demand for popular fish species like tuna, while on land, we're exterminating important predators like wolves to protect livestock. Those cows again, and the less diverse those ecosystems are, the more vulnerable they become to disturbances, including those other four impacts I just mentioned. And the fact is, there is a bunch more where those came from, because there's a whole separate set of effects that humanity has on the biosphere that stem simply from us putting the wrong amounts of certain stuff in the wrong place at the wrong time.