Main content
Wireless Philosophy
Course: Wireless Philosophy > Unit 3
Lesson 2: Political- Political: Original Position
- Political: Race and the Carceral State
- Political: Race and Racist Institutions
- Political: Government and Marriage (Government's Role)
- Political: The Prisoner's Dilemma
- Political: Tragedy of the Commons
- Political: Collective Action Problems
- Political: What are Public Goods?
- Political: Government and Marriage (Minimal Marriage)
- Political: Government and Marriage (Friends with Legal Benefits)
- Political: Government and Marriage (Polyamory)
- Political: Government and Marriage (Just Care)
- Political: Why Vote? Reasons to Vote
- Political: Should We Have Children?
© 2023 Khan AcademyTerms of usePrivacy PolicyCookie Notice
Political: Race and Racist Institutions
In this video, Eduardo Mendieta (Penn State University) asks "What are the consequences of race thinking and the institutional and legal forms of segregation if race is not real? Why do we categorize race as a real thing based on visual perception and how is such a category anti-democratic?"
Speaker: Dr. Eduardo Mendieta, Professor of Philosophy, Pennsylvania State University.
Speaker: Dr. Eduardo Mendieta, Professor of Philosophy, Pennsylvania State University.
Video transcript
(intro music) Hi! I am professor Eduardo Mendieta, and I teach philosophy at Stony Brook University. But in the fall semester of 2015, I will
start teaching at Penn State University. Today, I want to talk to you about race,
and more precisely about racism. What I have to say will address
the following seeming paradox. How is it that while most scientists and philosophers claim that
race does not exist, it nonetheless has such material consequence in the lives
of most individuals? Let us begin with a thought experiment. If you're white, how much are you willing
to pay to become black if you're black? If you're black, how much are you
willing to pay to become white? The point of this thought experiment is to get us to recognize that we do have
a basic intuition, or awareness, that being of one or another race entails certain kinds of privileges and assets,
or liabilities and privations. I am going to claim that
while race does not exist, it is in fact produced, renewed, and
made enduring by racist institutions. Following the work of Angela Davis and Loïc Wacquant, two great
critics of US racism, I will talk about four key institutions that have habituated US citizens
into anti-black racism. The first institution is
the slave plantation. Most historians of the peculiar
institution of slavery in the US have noted that it was slavery in the US that chained blackness to servitude
and whiteness to liberty. Slaves historically have been all races,
but in the US, the institution of slavery created a chromocracy, a hierarchical order in which "blackness" was legally defined as "servitude," and "whiteness" as "freedom." Over two hundred and forty-five years, the institution of slavery produced blackness as a race that was marred by dispossession
and dehumanization. The second institution, or rather, set of institutions, is what was
called "Jim Crow," which is shorthand for "Jim Crow laws" that were legislated after
the end of the civil war. Jim Crow, de facto, was the
juridification of segregation. Buses, trains, bathrooms, water fountains,
schools, neighborhoods, voting booths. In general, almost every imaginable public
institution was racially segregated. But we can't understand the impact of
Jim Crow and the production of race if we don't first note how it emerged. Slavery was abolished with
the ratification of the Thirteenth Amendment to the Constitution,
which reads: "Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude except as a
punishment for crime whereof the party should have been duly convicted shall
exist within the United States or any place subject to their jurisdiction. This is indeed a remarkable text. On the one hand, it abolished slavery as a form of private property that sustained the whole political economy and
cultural life of the South. On the other, the text created,
immediately, a legal exception. Slavery will endure, but now as a form of
punishment to be enacted by the state. Now, state-run slavery, as a form of punishment, defines "blackness"
as "criminality." At the very moment that blacks were freed, their entry into civil society and the social space of freedom is immediately
made conditional. In fact, during the reconstruction period, a whole set of what were
called "black laws" were issued that de facto criminalized any and most activities of recently liberated blacks. This process of criminalizing
blackness culminated with the 1896 Supreme Court ruling "Plessy
versus Ferguson" that ratified the constitutionality of the
separate-but-equal doctrine. The third institution I want to
talk about is the black ghetto. The ghetto is not simply an urban space. It is a series of legal, economic, political, and of course
educational institutions. The black ghetto is a direct
result of Jim Crow. And we could say that the ghetto is the crystallization of the separate-but-equal
doctrine in urban space. It replaces the slave plantation as a way to contain, marginalize, segregate, and
dispossess in the African-Americans. The fourth and final institution that I will discuss is what I would
call the "ethnoracial prison." The US constitutes five percent of the world population, yet it has twenty-five
percent of the world prison population. In 2015, the United States
has a prison population of about 2.2 million prisoners, representing a five hundred percent increase
in the last three decades. Of this number, more than sixty percent are made up of African-Americans and
other minorities, mostly Latinos. While one in every seventeen white males has the likelihood of being in prison, one in every three black males is
more likely to end up in prison. In fact, for black males in their
thirties, one in ten is either in a prison or a jail on any given day. But if we look at these
rates of incarceration, what we have in fact is a racial
prison industrial complex. Prisons are a way to deprive supposed criminals of their freedom, as a way to pay society for their crimes and
violations of the social contract. They began as institutions
of reform and reeducation, but have turned into sites of political disenfranchisement, economic
privation, and desocialization. In this way, they perform a dual-role: they're sites of dispossession
and sites of capital extraction. They're political, economic engines
that transfer economic wealth and political capital from blacks to whites and those that benefit from whiteness. In the history of the United States, these four institutions have been
intricately entwined, seamlessly transitioning into each other. Over the last four hundred years, these racist institutions have produced, reproduced, renewed, and made
racism enduring in the US. Over the last four hundred years, they
have produced blackness as a race that is associated with dispossession, criminality, marginality, and privation. Race does not exist, precisely because it is the relationship among these
institutions and how they create a certain habit that determine
how we interact with each other on assumptions and
prejudices about who we think is black. A radical philosophy of race allows us to think through the seeming
paradox of the non-existence of race, yet grapple with its
visible and violent effects. With Angela Davis, we can say that
slavery has yet to be abolished, as its long shadow continues
to darken our democracy. Thank you. Subtitles by the Amara.org community