- Early Modern: Locke on Personal Identity, Part 1
- Early Modern: Locke on Personal Identity, Part 2
- Early Modern: Locke on Personal Identity, Part 3
- Early Modern: Descartes' Cogito Argument
- Early Modern: Émilie du Châtelet, Part 1
- Early Modern: Émilie du Châtelet, Part 2
- Early Modern: Margaret Cavendish, Part 1
- Early Modern: Margaret Cavendish, Part 2
In the second of two videos, Adela Deanova introduces Margaret Cavendish, an early modern English philosopher, and discusses the background to her critique of experimental philosophy. This video is a part of a series of videos coming from Project Vox (Duke), a project recovering the lost voices of women philosophers.
Speaker: Adela Deanova, Duke University.
Speaker: Adela Deanova, Duke University.
Want to join the conversation?
- I wish these videos explored the ideas and theories of Cavendish instead of just giving us her historical background. In all the other videos (which center around male philosophers), we get scant, if any, details on their personal history; the focus is primarily on their philosophical positions. I'm not saying I'm opposed to content that puts a philosopher's ideas into historical context - in fact, I think some of the videos in this section could certainly benefit from MORE context - but I think it's a little troubling that the few videos centered on women philosophers don't contain much of their philosophy...
At the end of this video, the author implies that she made further content, including a piece on "[Cavendish's] Criticisms of Mechanical and Experimental Philosophy". I think Khan Academy should upload that piece instead. Wouldn't that video be more relevant and in line with the other videos in the "History of Philosophy" section?(20 votes)
- I agree, however, I would compromise and suggest to split the Videos into the context part - to see Relations - and the focus on the main idea part. I think you Need both and can understand the idea better in ist temporal context.(3 votes)
- What were her idea? did she have any,- any really noteworthy like the others in this list like Kant, Hume, etc.?(2 votes)
(intro music) So this is Adela Deanova in the philosophy department at Duke University, where we are leading Project Vox. this is part two of Margaret Cavendish, an English philosopher who worked in the middle of the seventeenth century. To put Cavendish's publications in context, in the sixteenth and seventeenth century, the number of women whose works were published in print increased to the hundreds. However, most of these works were not published quarto, or folio, format, what we would today think of as quote-unquote "a book." To give her works respectability, she published her works in a format expected for scholarly works, the kind that would be included in university libraries, and commissioned to the best possible publishers, printers, and illustrators. In her works, she experimented with a variety of styles and genres to express her views on natural philosophy. This also made her unusual, compared to other philosophers of her day. Since scholars would not engage with her and public debate, given her public notoriety and her unusual ways of expressing her views, Cavendish sent her works as presents to well-known academics at universities such as Oxford and Cambridge. They could not refuse. She was after all, one of the most prominent aristocrats in England. During the 1660s, Cavendish also became interested in the world of experimental philosophers such as Robert Boyle. On May 30th, 1667, she gained even more notoriety for being the very first woman to attend a meeting of the Royal Society. At the Society meeting, Cavendish observed Robert Boyle's experiments with the air pump and his experiments with mixing colors with the assistance of Robert Hooke. At a time when many women writers were concerned primarily with issues of religion and moral philosophy, or the education of women, Cavendish really trailblazed her way by developing a unique and very publicly presented position in natural philosophy. By the time of her death in 1673, she had developed a philosophical position which critiqued all the dominant materialist, mechanist, and dualist theories of substance and causation of her day. Cavendish criticizes Cartesian dualism, Hobbesian materialism, and the mechanist views of nature propounded by members of the Royal Society, such as Robert Boyle and Robert Hooke. According to many scholars today, Cavendish really staked out a completely new position that was distinguished from both the dualism and the materialism of her philosophical contemporaries. In the next few videos, we will accompany Cavendish on her visit to the Royal Society and look at her criticisms of the leading approach to studying nature in her day: the experimental and mechanical philosophy Subtitles by the Amara.org community