If you're seeing this message, it means we're having trouble loading external resources on our website.

If you're behind a web filter, please make sure that the domains *.kastatic.org and *.kasandbox.org are unblocked.

Main content

Ancient: Xunzi on Human Nature

In this video, David Wong discusses Xunzi's view of human nature.

Speaker: Dr. David Wong, Susan Fox Beischer and George D. Beischer Professor of Philosophy, Duke University.

Want to join the conversation?

  • starky tree style avatar for user Oliver
    In our busy and secularised world I see that a lot of people have problems to be grateful, even though we have all we need. (See Video on the Tetrapharmakos)
    Wouldn't it be nice to combine the ideo of rituals and gratefulness altogether and maybe develop a way to be thankful every day like secular prayers or other rituals? Socrates for example did a prayer every morning and was, as we all know, the wisest person in ancient greece.
    (10 votes)
    Default Khan Academy avatar avatar for user
    • stelly orange style avatar for user A. Msa
      I agree with you, Oliver, on the positive effects of certain rituals to focus on gratefulness without the need for any mythology or dogma (be they Christian, Islamic or Judaic) behind them. Meditation seems a good tool for this, as it can be done completely secular.
      (4 votes)
  • starky tree style avatar for user Oliver
    What kind of ritual(s) could we do (or do already) that improve ethical education?
    The drinking example seems, for me at least, a bit abstract. A child would really see hierarchy in it but i don't think it would get the point that "all depend on each other".
    (5 votes)
    Default Khan Academy avatar avatar for user
  • leafers ultimate style avatar for user Florence Tsang
    So Xunzi's view is that human beings have both bad motivations and good motivations inside them. We have to craft ourselves to restrain the motivations that get us into trouble, and strengthen the motivations that allow us to harmonize with each other. Therefore naturally, human beings does not only have bad motivations, but both good and bad motivations. So why is Xunzi's view that human nature is bad, but not human nature is a mix of good and bad? Many thanks!
    (5 votes)
    Default Khan Academy avatar avatar for user
  • leafers seed style avatar for user jennycqd
    Meng zi used Rita example to claim his view " human are born good."
    What's the example Xunzi to prove his view " human are born evil"?
    (2 votes)
    Default Khan Academy avatar avatar for user
  • piceratops sapling style avatar for user Joshthecreator
    Isn't saying that everything good can be achieved through knowledge obviously wrong? Because when we know something is good, we often don't follow it as we should. We also should act along with what we know is true and correct.
    (1 vote)
    Default Khan Academy avatar avatar for user
    • leaf green style avatar for user Matthew Grandi
      Laws of attraction friend. Our thoughts line up with our emotions initiating an effect. Knowledge is power and anything can be achieved through knowledge. Most of the time without knowledge someone trying to do good who ignores basic cognitive bias and human probability leaves at risk a good cause ultimately having a negative effect.
      (2 votes)
  • leafers seedling style avatar for user patriball
    Mengzi says human nature is good, while Xunzi says it is bad. I'm wondering why human nature should be either of those things? Is it possible that the idea of "good" and "bad" are just human response based upon reflection? Is it possible that calling human nature "good" or "bad" is merely assigning a value to something that doesn't inherently have value? This whole thing reminds me of the Taoist parable of the farmer who lost his horse.

    On the other hand, could it be possible that human nature isn't our root foundation to begin with, but instead being held up by animal nature underneath it, plant nature underneath that, and maybe even natural law at the root (based on the line of thinking of Aristotle's Ergon Argument)? While a plants capability of growth drives its nature towards selfish consumption, a humans capability of reasoning drives its nature towards altruism. But if a human doesn't utilize its shared "plant nature" of selfish consumption it won't survive, and therefore won't be able to utilize its "human nature" to begin with. Also, if one puts "selfishness" and "altruism" on opposite ends of a spectrum (and maybe call it the spectrum of good and bad), it might look like evolution, through time, is pushing life's nature in a single direction along that spectrum.
    (1 vote)
    Default Khan Academy avatar avatar for user
  • purple pi purple style avatar for user Mattia Mariantoni
    Did Thomas Hobbes inspire his ideas from Xunzi?
    (1 vote)
    Default Khan Academy avatar avatar for user
  • leaf blue style avatar for user Raii6Desu
    If our nature in itself is bad, how come we find beauty.. beauty? what made us enjoy beauty and making ourselves into "a beautiful creature"? (other than logical coexisting purposes) I feel that holding this kind of desire for better self in all ever spoken of philosophies and day-to-day experience does not help with what Xunzi claims.
    (1 vote)
    Default Khan Academy avatar avatar for user

Video transcript

(intro music) Hello! I'm David Wong, a professor of philosophy at Duke University, and I'm going to talk about Xunzi, an early Chinese philosopher who lived during the fourth and third century BCE. He was a follower of Confucius and is best known for his view that human nature is bad. He explicitly criticized another Confucian named Mengzi, or, as he came to be known in the West, "Mencius," for holding that human nature is good. I recommend, if you haven't seen it already, a very clear Wireless introduction to Mengzi by Matthew Walker. In saying that human nature is good, Mengzi means that human beings have inborn dispositions that can grow into full-blown goodness. He sometimes likened these dispositions to sprouts. Sprouts have a natural direction of growth, if nurtured by water, sun, fertile soil, and human effort. If we are raised in a secure environment where we do not have to constantly worry about our survival, if we are given ethical education, and if we make the personal effort to develop what is good in ourselves, we can grow our sprout-like compassion into healthy plants of goodness. Xunzi places himself in diametrical opposition to Mengzi. He believed that human beings are born with a fondness for profit, with hatred and dislike of others, and desires for sensual pleasure. If we follow our natures, Xunzi argued, we will engage in continued destructive conflict with each other. That is what he meant by saying "human nature is bad." Fortunately, we human beings also have the capacity to think and to approve or disapprove of where our natural feelings and desires leader us. Xunzi believed that through our intelligence, human beings could turn our naturally ugly tendencies towards chaos and conflict into lives of harmony and beauty. In the ancient past, Xunzi believed, the most farseeing of human beings, the sages, realized that acting naturally is the surest path to self-destruction. The sages created ideas of right and wrong to curb the unrestrained pursuit of satisfying our own desires, and to require consideration of others. The sages created customs called "rituals" that train us to respect others and to be grateful for what they give us. One ritual Xunzi discussed was the village drinking ceremony. Everyone gathers for a toast, but only one cup is used, from which everyone drinks in order of seniority. The order of drinking teaches the younger to defer to the older, and drinking from one cup teaches them that they are one village and that they depend on each other. Xunzi also placed special importance on the rituals of mourning and burial of deceased parents. Because parents have given us the gift of our lives and had nurtured us, we must express our deepest gratitudes and feelings of loss. Xunzi used a metaphor for the human path to goodness that is very different from Mengzi's sprouts going into healthy plants. He thought of human beings as craftsmen, who fashion themselves into something beautiful that we would never become naturally. We are like potters who take the lumpy clay of our natures and turn them into beautiful vessels. The sages gave us the instruments for crafting ourselves, ideas of right and wrong, and rituals. But this belief in the transforming power of ritual poses a problem for Xunzi. How can we become so good when we begin as bad creatures with a desire for profit, hate and dislike of others, and desires for sensual pleasure? Xunzi's answer is that there are some natural impulses that are strengthened when we express them through ritual. He says that all creatures of blood and breath, not just humans, love members have their own kind. They will grieve over the loss of their mates. His example was of the behavior of birds, but today we might think of the behavior of elephants, who seem to grieve for dead members of their family and who have been known to stay beside the bodies of their deceased friends for three days without moving from the spot. Thus, in the end, Xunzi might have recognized that, along with all the bad motivations that get us into trouble, we have impulses that tie us to each other and that can be strengthened by rituals, such as the village drinking ceremony and rituals of mourning and burial of those to whom we are grateful. We human animals are complicated and conflicted in our motivations, and Xunzi might be right in holding that we must craft ourselves to restrain the motivations that get us into trouble and to strengthen the motivations that allow us to harmonize with each other. Subtitles by the Amara.org community