California Academy of Sciences
- Ecosystems and ecological networks
- Ecological interactions
- Ecological levels: from individuals to ecosystems
- Test your knowledge: ecosystem function
- Exploration questions: ecosystem function
- Activities: biodiversity and ecosystem function
- Glossary: biodiversity and ecosystem function
- Answers to the exploration questions: ecosystem function
Individuals, species, populations, communities, and ecosystems...what's the difference?
Have you ever heard the expression “you can’t tell the players without a program” and found it to be true? Sometimes you need background information, a list of the players, their titles or functions, definitions, explanations of interactions and rules to be able to understand a sporting event, a theatrical play or a game. The same is true for understanding the subtle but important differences among the various components that make up an ecosystem. Terms such as individual, population, species, community and ecosystem all represent distinct ecological levels and are not synonymous, interchangeable terms. Here is your brief guide or program to understanding these ecological players.
You are an individual, your pet cat is an individual, a moose in Canada is an individual, a coconut palm tree on an island in the Indian Ocean is an individual, a gray whale cruising in the Pacific Ocean is an individual, and a tapeworm living in the gut of a cow is an individual, as is the cow itself. An individual is one organism and is also one type of organism (e.g., human, cat, moose, palm tree, gray whale, tapeworm, or cow in our example). The type of organism is referred to as the species. There are many different definitions of the word species, but for now we’ll leave it simply that it is a unique type of organism. As a grammatical aside, note that the word “species” always ends in an “s”. Even if you are referring to just one type of organism, one species, it is a species; there is no such thing as a specie. That’s just one of those grammatical facts of life.
Each species that has been studied and described by scientists has been given a two-part name, their binomial or scientific name, that uniquely identifies it (e.g., humans = Homo sapiens; domestic cats = Felis catus; moose = Alces alces; coconut palms = Cocos nucifera; gray whales = Eschrichtius robustus; cow tapeworms = Taenia saginata; and domestic cows = Bos taurus). The power or value of the scientific name is that it makes clear what type of organism you are talking about. Since only one type of organism in the entire world has that unique name, it makes for much clearer communication and understanding than using common names. If you are talking about a gopher, for example, just using its common name like this, you might be referring to a type of mammal that lives underground, a type of snake, or even a type of tortoise, depending on what part of the country you are in.
If you refer to the gopher Gopherus polyphemus, you are talking only about the gopher tortoise.
So what’s a population? It’s a group of individuals that all belong to the same species. Populations are geographically based; they live in a particular area. But the size or scale of that area can be variable – we can talk about the human population in a city, a state, a country or a hemisphere. Or we can talk about the population of palm trees on just one island in the Indian Ocean, or on all of the islands that make up the Republic of Seychelles, or all of the islands in the Indian Ocean. The person studying or writing about the population gets to decide what scale to use, what is most appropriate for what they want to study or explain. That’s one of the exciting things about science – there’s a lot of freedom in defining the scope and scale of your project, but that means it is also important to explain clearly what scale you are using.
Species are made up of populations. How many populations? It all depends. It depends on how widespread the species is and how small or large the geographic area is. Some species have very limited ranges or distributions, being restricted, for example, to a single island or the top of a single mountain in the whole world. The single population on the island or mountaintop makes up the entire species. From a conservation perspective, such populations are extremely vulnerable – if anything happens to that one population, the entire species will be lost; the species will go extinct. But many species are more widespread. There are populations of moose, for example, in Yellowstone National Park, Maine, Minnesota, Alberta, Manitoba and other U.S. states and Canadian provinces. If you want to know how many moose there are on Earth, you have to know the sizes of all the different populations in all the different locations.
Communities are made up of all the populations of different species in a given area. Why the vague term “in a given area?” Because once again the scale is flexible, determined by the person studying or writing about the community. We might be talking about the community of all the organisms living in the very top or canopy of a single rainforest tree or of all the trees in the forest. What’s most important about the community concept is that it involves multiple populations of all the different species in the given area and how these species interact with each other. Each of the populations is made up of individuals of a particular species, and the individuals interact with each other – with members of their own species (e.g., fighting, grooming, mating, pollinating each other) and with individuals of other species (e.g., hunting them for food, using them as a place to build a nest, growing on them). Community ecologists study the populations in a given area and their interactions. There’s another article in this tutorial about different types of ecological interactions.
That leaves us with the ecosystem level. What’s the difference between communities and ecosystems? When you’re talking about ecosystems, you’re not only looking at all the different populations and species in the given area, but you’re also looking at the physical environment, the non-living or abiotic conditions (language alert: the prefix “a” means “without” and the root word “bio” means life, so abiotic is literally “without life” or in other words, non-living), and not just what they are, but how they impact the organisms, and in some cases how the organisms impact the physical environment. For example, temperature and rainfall patterns influence where different terrestrial species of plants and animals live; some can survive dry desert conditions, others need the high rainfall found in rainforests. But the forests themselves also influence temperature and rainfall patterns. Have you ever noticed on a hot summer day how much cooler and moist it is in the shade of a forest than out in the open? And worms change the structure and composition of soil as they churn through it.
What size is an ecosystem? Guess what – it depends on how big or small the scientist or author wants to define it to be. It could be as small as your backyard, or Walden Pond, or the entire Australian outback. Different sizes or scales will be appropriate for different types of studies, reports and policies. The scientist or author just needs to explain what the size is and why it is appropriate.
The diagram above will hopefully help you visualize how the different ecological levels are related to each other. Individuals make up a population; populations make up a species; multiple species and their interactions make up a community; and multiple species and their interactions make up ecosystems when you include the abiotic factors. This is the hierarchy of ecology.
Want to join the conversation?
- "An individual is one organism and is also one type of organism(species)"
If two species mated and some infertile hybrid was made that could not pass on its genes, would that infertile hybrid technically NOT be an individual because it doesn't belong to a species, being the only member?(10 votes)
- Good question! The definition of what a species is--and to some extent, what an individual is--does not have a clear consensus among taxonomists. I will illustrate this with a genetic definition, a biological definition, and an evolutionary definition of species.
Being a genetically distinct species, regardless of fertility or species population, is sometimes enough for taxonomists to classify different organisms as separate species. Take Lonesome George for instance: he was widely considered to be the last individual of the species Chelonoidis abingdonii. However, he was still genetically distinct from the other Galápagos tortoises. George would therefore be considered a separate species by genetic standards. The same principle can be used for hybrids, who have a different genetic makeup than their parents (I.E: The mule).
However, some may use different definitions of species to draw the line between different organisms. Some use what is called the Biological Species Concept, which involves the ability to interbreed with other individuals. If two species cannot breed with each other, they are distinct. This definition breaks down with hybrids; with hybrids, you can have two genetically separate species with two different niches be considered the same species because of hybrid production. Applying this concept here, your infertile hybrid would be the same species as its parents.
If you look at the Evolutionary Species Concept, though, you'd be right. This concept is like the Biological Species Concept, but the offspring maintain their characteristics over time. For instance, look at Pakicetus, what is known as the most basal whale. Its remains suggested an aquatic lifestyle, and it also had an inner ear structure found in modern Cetaceans. All of these characteristics remained as the species evolved. Because the hybrid is infertile, it would not be able to maintain its characteristics, meaning that it is not a species under this concept.
I encourage you to explore more of these species concepts, as this question does not have a clear answer. Depending on your definition, the answer would be a yes or a no.
Did this help?(7 votes)
- How are niches related to these levels in ecology?(6 votes)
- Niche is the role an organism has in an ecosystem. For more info, click https://www.khanacademy.org/science/biology/ecology/community-ecosystem-ecology/v/niche-bozeman (video) or https://www.khanacademy.org/science/biology/ecology/community-ecosystem-ecology/a/niches-competition (article). I think the study of niche should be in community, because it is the role it has that impacts other populations. I hope you find this helpful! :)(7 votes)
- What would happen if there were no ecosystems/ if all the ecosystems died? Is there a theory for what would happen to all the living things?(4 votes)
- Probably the whole Biosphere and Life would collapse. But I do not see shortly :D(7 votes)
- Could a community of animals slowly start collapsing on its self. For example they start to eat each other slowly, slowly eating there population away until they no longer exist. Basically eating each other to extinction.(4 votes)
- Every population that experiences a spike eventually exhausts their food source and collapses. They don't usually resort to canibalism but it does happen sometimes. This usually causes a chain reaction across the food web that can increase and decrease other organisms in the community.(2 votes)
- why is population bigger than ecosystem(3 votes)
- It does not make sense. The ecosystem is a category above the population of individual species. An ecosystem comprises of many populations...(4 votes)
- In the second paragraph, individual and species are the same thing or different? Kinda need more information(3 votes)
- Individuals and Species are different.. Look at it this way -
Definition of Individual - A single organism, of a specific species.
Definition of Population - All of that particular species in a given area.
So, species in this example, is just an additional way to specify the ecological levels.
Hope that helps!(4 votes)
- What are some of the "many definitions" of species?(5 votes)
- A biological species is a group of organisms that can reproduce with one another in nature and produce fertile offsprings.(3 votes)
- what would happen if there was too much of one community?(1 vote)
- Nothing to be honest, well if they are in a larger space, because increasing the size of a community will increase the number of all organisms, meaning that competition may not really be affected. However, if they were to be cramped, then this would cause competition, affecting the population of the species as well as others.(4 votes)
- if an individual is affected by the ecosystem (for exaple a disease , that individual can affect other community?(1 vote)
- Yes. If that disease drastically reduces the population. Or even if that disease could infect other species in the community.(3 votes)
- what if we had a regular palm tree on an island, but then a different kind of palm tree that was bred to be a hybrid between the one on the island and a different one, wouldn't the eventual product have part of each scientific name in the end?(1 vote)
- If it successfully reproduced and those palm trees did not reproduce with either of the two progenitor species, then it would be a new species and would be given a new scientific name.(3 votes)