If you're seeing this message, it means we're having trouble loading external resources on our website.

If you're behind a web filter, please make sure that the domains *.kastatic.org and *.kasandbox.org are unblocked.

Main content

All men are created equal

The phrase "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal" appears in the second paragraph of the Declaration of Independence, written in 1776. Although "men" in this case was intended to represent "all mankind," at the time of the American Revolution full citizenship was reserved for white men. By saying all men were "created equal" Thomas Jefferson intended to abolish the system of hereditary aristocracy, where some individuals were born as lords and others were ordinary. Over time, the phrase "all men are created equal" has come to be interpreted to mean "all people are created equal," regardless of race, sex, or class.  Created by Sal Khan and Aspen Institute.

Want to join the conversation?

  • male robot donald style avatar for user Suden Nym
    If all people are equal then why did Americans have slaves.
    (18 votes)
    Default Khan Academy avatar avatar for user
    • piceratops ultimate style avatar for user Ryan
      There are probably a ton of reasons and lots of shades of grey, but there are a few that come to mind:

      1. Racism. Some colonists didn't consider africans to be people.
      2. Hypocracy. The idea that "It's not ok for someone to treat me badly but since I'm nice to my slaves its ok for me to have them".
      3. Apathy. Some people simply didn't care about the slaves. The same way today some Americans care more about Americans that have lived here for more than one generation than they do migrant workers or people who have just recently moved to the United States. Or, how some people want equal rights for some groups but not others. This theme is true for race, gender, and sexual preferences.
      4. Greed. They might have cared about slaves and considered them people, but may have cared more about their life style and acquiring wealth.

      However, consider this: not all americans had slaves, and many of them asked themselves the same question you just did. Apparently many of the writers and signers had second thoughts about slaves after the revolution.
      (31 votes)
  • orange juice squid orange style avatar for user Steven Serrano
    they wrote that all men are created equal so why did they have slave that worked for them if all men are created equal?
    (6 votes)
    Default Khan Academy avatar avatar for user
    • primosaur ultimate style avatar for user Benzion Chinn
      Part of the difficulty here is that you need to distinguish between a general moral claim of all people being equal and the practical legal claim of citizens to have rights that a government must protect. For example, I can believe to the high heavens in equality, but that does not obligate me nor does it make it even particularly likely that I would support invading Saudia Arabia to liberate their women. This distinction, while reasonable, opens up a back door for slavery. Blacks may be equal, but if they are not citizens then the government is not likely to step in and remove them from slavery.
      (2 votes)
  • winston default style avatar for user Griff
    If everyone was created equal, than how come different people had different rights? Why couldn't women or non-white people vote? Do America's founders have a built in bias towards everyone but themselves?
    (6 votes)
    Default Khan Academy avatar avatar for user
  • leafers ultimate style avatar for user KNOWPOWER55
    do you think it is right not to include women in the statement, "all men are created equal"? Do you think they would ever consider including women in that statement?
    (4 votes)
    Default Khan Academy avatar avatar for user
  • hopper jumping style avatar for user Matthieu Bouchon
    How did this "all men are created equal" start with? Why did they say that, even though Franklin was rich and Jefferson owned a lot of property?
    (3 votes)
    Default Khan Academy avatar avatar for user
  • piceratops sapling style avatar for user Travelingfamily123
    How many times has the decloration been changed?
    (2 votes)
    Default Khan Academy avatar avatar for user
  • blobby green style avatar for user Diane  Crawford
    This video made me change my perspective on the words "we the people" . I was thinking of all of us..... Not in what the men of the late 1700's were thinking of. They didn't include slaves and women. This modern thinking makes a difference on how one answers a quiz .
    (2 votes)
    Default Khan Academy avatar avatar for user
    • male robot hal style avatar for user Conrad Long
      I think even though the Founders didn't think that women and slaves should vote, they still wanted it to be a good system for them. Kind of like children today. They wanted the best for all of the people, and they certainly didn't consider women or slaves to be sub-human. Our ideals for a society have just changed.
      (1 vote)
  • blobby green style avatar for user TheShoNuffMaster
    At about It is stated that Thomas Jefferson fathered children through Sally Hemings. This not a fact and is a disputed point. An example of the problems with the statement can be found at http://www.wallbuilders.com/libissuesarticles.asp?id=124. To teach as though this is a factual piece of history seems inappropriate.
    (1 vote)
    Default Khan Academy avatar avatar for user
    • duskpin ultimate style avatar for user Миленa
      Genetic analysis confirms that Hemmings' children were fathered by a person from the Jefferson family. Given the circumstances, it was most likely Thomas Jefferson himself. So it's very likely. If in history we only went by undisputed facts, then we could teach very little in history. Everything about pre-historic societies would be unteachable.
      (3 votes)
  • blobby green style avatar for user Hunter Powers
    for historical perspective, how long did it take for other civilizations like greece or rome or egypt to resolve the issue of slavery?
    (1 vote)
    Default Khan Academy avatar avatar for user
    • piceratops ultimate style avatar for user AegonTargaryen
      They didn't really, slavery outlived all of these civilizations. Rome swallowed up Greece and Egypt. Then Rome was swallowed up by barbarian tribes in the west and the caliphate in the east. The barbarian tribes would eventually become the Europe we know if today. Slavery faded away in Europe gradually from 1100 to around 1500 mostly because it had started to become uneconomical. Slavery occurred in the Muslim world until it was banned in the Ottoman empire in the late 1800s but by then, the empire had little power to enforce this ban.
      (2 votes)
  • piceratops ultimate style avatar for user Anonymous Red (Online)
    How many people worked on the Declaration of Independence?
    (1 vote)
    Default Khan Academy avatar avatar for user

Video transcript

Man 1: The second paragraph of the declaration is one of the most amazing set of phrases ever written. It is the creed of what makes America and now, what makes the aspirations of many people around the world. Let's just read that first sentence of the second paragraph, which is just awesome. It's, "We hold these truths to be self-evident "that all men are created equal, that they are endowed "by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, "that among these are Life, Liberty, and the pursuit "of Happiness." Man 2: "All men are created equal, that they are endowed "by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the pursuit "of Happiness." Let's start even with the word "we". Who's "we"? "We", it says, is the American colonies, now gathering as the United States of America, but they're basically white males. Everybody at that convention is a white male, most of them landowners. So, what the arc of American history shows is that word "we" begins, over the course of decades and then centuries, to include more and more people. Eventually, it includes freed slaves, eventually it includes women, but that's a narrative of American history, is who are we that have these truths as self-evident, that we're all equal? Now, it's also interesting, the phrase "self-evident". This is something that comes from the rationality of the scientific era we were in. This is an age right after Isaac Newton has made everything in the universe rational through scientific laws and it also comes from some of the philosophers, especially David Hume, that there are just certain things that are self-evident. That's an important concept, that they're not appealing to anybody else to say, "What are these truths?" They're saying, "This is just our rationality tells us "this is true," but then they say, "all men are created equal." Now, they say men. Back then, men was supposed to be a phrase that was more inclusive than just males. Man 2: For man. Man 1: Right, it's like mankind, to some extent, but then again, at least Jefferson, he owned slaves. Women, they weren't necessarily given the right to vote. Even though they mean "man" sort of like mankind, they also really generally mean men, at this point. Once again, this is where the American narrative starts. Fortunately, that phrase gets expanded over time as to what they mean. Man 2: Right. Man 1: Look at the phrase "created equal". What does that really mean? First of all, it doesn't mean that people are always equal. At a certain point in life, Jefferson owns a whole lot of property and Franklin is quite rich as a printer and different people have different statuses in life, but they're saying that in a fundamental, political way, we all start off created equal. We have certain rights that you just can't take away from us whether we're rich or poor or whatever. Those unalienable rights are Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness. Man 2: I'm guessing it's also a ding at the King, because royalty ... One underlying assumption is that it's inherited and that you are created better off. Man 1: Right and Thomas Paine, who is a pamphleteer, has just written this document Common Sense and that's helped inspire everybody. At the heart of the document Common Sense is that there's no divine right of kings. Divine right of kings was a British concept, which meant God made certain people more equal or better than others, and the king, by divine right, had these powers and we're saying, "No, the kings don't "have any more powers." Ben Franklin was very much of that way, which was he hated the notion of aristocracy, that some people were born noble and some people were born aristocratic and some people were born royal and whatever, but think about it for a moment. What was Thomas Jefferson thinking? A guy who owns a lot of slaves, what was he thinking when he writes this amazing phrase, "all men are created equal"? I think he was very conflicted. Here's a guy who did not end up even freeing most of his slaves in his lifetime and yet, he could write these inspiring words. If you read about Jefferson, you know that was the fundamental conflict and it's a conflict that we, as a nation, have been wrestling with. Man 2: As a slaveowner, he also knew them very well. He knew them as human beings, perhaps. Man 1: Right, well he fathered children with one of the slaves. Ben Franklin is interesting, because early on in life, he had two household slaves, who he didn't really treat as slaves, but they were his household servants and he had allowed the advertising of slavery in the Pennsylvania Gazette, the newspaper that he published, but he realized, after he writes these words, "created equal", he realizes how abhorrent that is, to his own notions, that people are created equal. Of course, he's by then, freed his slaves, but becomes a president of the Society for the Abolition of Slavery in Pennsylvania, as a way of trying to make up for the fact that he'd erred, he had been wrong when he was young, to tolerate the institution of slavery and he becomes an abolitionist. Of course, John Adams, from the very beginning, was an abolitionist. Man 2: This is important for people to realize. When you take an American history class, it seems like obviously everything comes to a head leading up the Civil War, but this was already starting to become an issue, a moral issue, a philosophical issue, even at the founding of the country. Man 1: And a political issue, as well, because if you want Jefferson and you want Virginia in, the reason John Adams ... He was a great abolitionist, but there were no plantations. There was no cotton being grown in Massachusetts, but if you were a cotton farmer or a plantation owner in Virginia, you tended to own slaves and it becomes a great political issue where the slaveholding states have to be brought into this union. We see that conflict when the constitution is written 11 years later. They're still having this conflict on what do we do about slavery? Man 2: Yeah and it will continue for another 70-something years. Man 1: Yeah, if you want to say that it was totally resolved by the Civil War and there will be some who will say that that was the original stain on this unbelievably beautiful phrase, which is that "all men are created equal." Man 2: Yeah, very cool.