AP®︎ Calculus BC (2017 edition)
- Analyzing concavity (algebraic)
- Inflection points (algebraic)
- Mistakes when finding inflection points: second derivative undefined
- Mistakes when finding inflection points: not checking candidates
- Analyzing the second derivative to find inflection points
- Analyze concavity
- Find inflection points
- Concavity review
- Inflection points review
Candidates for inflection points are points where the second derivative is zero *and* points where the second derivative is undefined. It's important not to overlook any candidate.
Want to join the conversation?
- CAN someone please explain me what does sal mean when he says "not equal to zero, but where the second derivative equal to zero??"6:05(3 votes)
- At6:05, Sal means that there is an inflection point, not at where the second derivative is zero, but at where the second derivative is undefined. Candidates for inflection points include points whose second derivatives are 0 or undefined. A common mistake is to ignore points whose second derivative are undefined, and miss a possible inflection point.
Hope that I helped.(18 votes)
- Why is x a candidate for being an inflection point when g''(x) undefined?(3 votes)
- Think about how 0 is a critical point for something like |x|, even though the derivative at x=0 is undefined(4 votes)
- This example is a little tricky because x^(1/3) can be complex when x is negative (i.e., the equation y^3=x has three solutions for y--one real and two complex). I bring this up because some computer programs like Mathematica and Matlab plots x^(1/3) using their complex values when x<0...(4 votes)
- 3:44what does Sal mean by saying you have to be close enough so that nothing unusual happens? What could happen? I'm a little confused now.(4 votes)
- what if the question were to find the inflection point of the sq. root instead of the cube root and we had a situation where the second derivative function is not defined for all the numbers to the left of the inflection point candidate? How would one answer such a question?(3 votes)
- do we test for the x that was undefined to be defined in the original function when answering questions about inflection points?(2 votes)
- At1:30why isn't x=0 a solution? You could determine that x=0 rendering the expression equal to zero.(1 vote)
- X can't be equal to 0 because there is no x in the numerator which makes the numerator always equal to 2, if you try to plug in any number to get the second derivative equal to 0, the closest you can get is 0 in the denominator rendering the function undefined. Hope this helps(3 votes)
- How can one tell if a point of discontinuity (function is defined at that point) is a local minimum or maximum point?(2 votes)
- Hello I am very confused here. So f(x) is obviously discontinuous at x=0, so how can there be an inflection point at x=0? By definition, aren't inflection points continuous? Thanks.(1 vote)
- No. An inflection point is one where the second derivative changes between positive and negative. That doesn't require the function to be continuous.(2 votes)
- I don't know why there is an inflection point at where the second derivative is undefined. Can anyone explain to me please?(1 vote)
- [Instructor] Robert was asked to find where g of x, which is equal to the cube root of x, has inflection points. This is his solution. And then later we are asked, "Is Robert's work correct? "If not, what's his mistake?" So pause this video and try to figure it out on your own. All right, now let's work through this together. So our original g of x is equal to the cube root of x, which is the same thing as x to the 1/3. So in step one it looks like Robert's trying to find the first and second derivative. So the first derivative, we just do the power rule, so it'll be 1/3x to the decrement of the exponent, so this is looking good. Second derivative, we take this, multiply this times 1/3, which would be negative 2/9. And then decrement, negative 2/3, which would indeed by negative 5/3, so that looks right. And then it looks like Robert's trying to rewrite it. So we have the negative 2/9 still, but then he recognized that this is the same thing as x to 5/3 in the denominator, and x to the 5/3 is the same thing as the cube root of x to the fifth. So this is all looking good. Step one looks good. And then step two, it looks like he's trying to find the solution or he's trying to find x values where the second derivative is equal to zero, and it is indeed true that this has no solution, that you can never make this second derivative equal to zero. In order to be zero, the numerator would have to be zero. And, well, two is never going to be equal to zero. So this is correct. And then step three, he says g doesn't have any inflection points. Now, this is a little bit suspect. It is in many cases our inflection point is a situation where our second derivative is equal to zero, and even then we don't know it's an inflection point. It would be a candidate inflection point. We would have to confirm that our second derivative crosses signs or switches signs as we cross that x value. But here we can't find a situation where our second derivative is equal to zero, but we have to remind ourselves that other candidate inflection points are where our second derivative is undefined. And so he can't make this statement without seeing where our second derivative could be undefined. So, for example, he could say that g prime prime is undefined when what? Well, this is going to be undefined when x is equal to zero. Zero to the fifth, cube root of that, that's gonna be zero. But then you're dividing by zero. So g prime prime undefined when x is equal to zero. So therefore x equals, so we could say candidate inflection point when x equals zero. And so then we would want to test it. And we could set up a traditional table that you might have seen before where we have our interval or intervals. We could have test values in our intervals. We have to be careful with those. Make sure that they are indicative. And then we would say the sign of our second derivative of g prime prime. And then we would have our concavity. Concavity of g. And in order for x equals zero to be an inflection point, we would have to switch signs, or our second derivative would have to switch signs as we cross x equals zero, which would mean our concavity of g switches signs as we cross x equals zero. So let's do values less than zero, negative infinity to zero and then values greater than zero, zero to infinity. I could do test values. Let's say, I'll use negative one and one. And you have to be careful when you use these. You have to make sure that we are close enough that nothing unusual happens between these test values up until we get to that candidate inflection point. And, now, what's the sign of our second derivative when x is equal to negative one? When x equals negative one. So, let's see, negative one to the fifth power is negative one. Cube root of negative one is negative one. And so we're gonna have negative 2/9 divided by negative one. It's gonna be positive 2/9. So our sign right over here is gonna be positive. And this is gonna be in general when we're dealing with any negative value, 'cause if you take any negative value to the fifth power, it's gonna be negative. And you take the cube root of that and you're gonna have negative. But then you have a negative value divided by that. You're gonna get a positive value. So you can feel good that this test value's indicative of actually this entire interval. And if you're dealing with a positive value, well, that to the fifth power is gonna be positive. Cube root of that is still going to be positive. But then you're gonna have negative 2/9 divided by that positive value, so this is going to be negative. So it is indeed the case that our concavity of g switches as we cross x equals zero. We're concave upwards when x is less than zero. Our second derivative is positive. And we're concave downwards when x is greater than zero. Let me write that a little bit. Downwards. Downwards when x is greater than zero. So we are switching concavity as we cross x equals zero, and so this tells us that x. So let's see, we are switching signs. Switching. Let me say g prime prime switching signs as we cross x equals zero. And our function is defined at x equals zero. And function defined at x equals zero. So we have an inflection point at x equals zero. So inflection point at x is equal to zero. And if you're familiar with the graph of the cube root, you would indeed see an inflection point at that point. So there we go. He was wrong in step three. There actually is an inflection point. It's not when the second derivative is equal to zero. It's actually where the second derivative is undefined.