How do you write an explicit formula for the sequence (8,11,16,23,32)

Notice that the sequence of differences is simply the sequence of odd numbers. So this is the sequence of squares shifted by a constant. Since 8-1=7, we have a(n) = n^2 +7

How would you find the explicit formula for a problem such as: "a" subscript 38 =-53.2, while the common difference is -1.1?

You need to know a common difference and one 'value' (sequence) in order to find the general form (formula). Since the common difference is -1.1, it would look like this: -1.1(n-1) + b (if you are starting from n=1). Then plug in "a" subscript 38 = -53.2 into the formula. Then it would be -1.1(38-1) + b = -53.2 All you have to do is solving for 'b' and it would be -12.5. Therefore, the general form (formula) would be -1.1(n-1) - 12.5 if you are starting from n=1.

When given an arithmetic sequence with a negative term, how do you calculate what term the number will be when it reaches 0?

Some sequences do not even have 0 as one of the possibilities. So if you start with a negative and have a negative common difference, then there is no zero such as -2, -4, -6, -8, ... Others will have a common difference that skips over zero such as -4, 4, 12, 20, 28, ... If the sequence does include a zero, such as an initial value of - 9 and a common difference of 3, we get an equation f(n) = -9 + 3(n-1). set this equal to zero, 0 = -9 + 3(n-1) move the - 9 by adding and distribute to get 9 = 3n - 3, add 3 to both sides, 3n = 12., divide by 3 to get n = 4. Sequence would be -9, -6, -3, 0 ... which is what we were looking for. So if your equation skipped 0 as above f(n) = -4 +8(n-1) and did the same thing, then 0 = -4 + 8n - 8, add 12 to get 12 = 8n, n = 12/8 = 3/2, but a sequence does not have a 3/2 term, only 1, 2, 3 ... terms.

how are the formulas for arithmetic sequences similar to functions?

Arithmetic sequences are functions. The difference between a linear function and a arithmetic sequence is that the first is continuous and the second is discrete, but the continuous line would go through all the points of its equivalent sequence.

which formula is more suitable to use recursive or explicit?

Most of the time, explicit has more power, but for a few occasions such as the Fibonacci sequence, the recursive is more applicable. The explicit equation is closer to the slope intercept form of the line that would go through all the poins of a particular arithmetic sequence.

how do I find out what the sequence pattern is with only knowing term 1 and 5 for example

the same way you find the slope of a line with two points, if a(1) = 10 and a(5) = 32 then the common difference is (32-10)/(5-1) = 22/4 = 5.5. so the explicit formula would be 10+7*(n-1)

Main content

Arithmetic sequences review

Google Classroom

Review arithmetic sequences and solve various problems involving them.

Parts and formulas of arithmetic sequences

In arithmetic sequences, the difference between consecutive terms is always the same. We call that difference the common difference.

For example, the common difference of the following sequence is

+ 2

	$+ 2 ↷$ ‍		$+ 2 ↷$ ‍		$+ 2 ↷$ ‍
$3,$ ‍		$5,$ ‍		$7,$ ‍		$9, …$ ‍

Arithmetic sequence formulas give

a (n)

, the

n^{th}

term of the sequence.

This is the explicit formula for the arithmetic sequence whose first term is

k

and common difference is

d

a (n) = k + (n - 1) d

This is the recursive formula of that sequence:

{\begin{cases} a (1) = k \\ a (n) = a (n - 1) + d \end{cases}

Want to learn more about arithmetic sequences? Check out this video.

Extending arithmetic sequences

Suppose we want to extend the sequence

3, 8, 13, …

We can see each term is

+ 5

from the previous term:

	$+ 5 ↷$ ‍		$+ 5 ↷$ ‍		$+ 5 ↷$ ‍
$3,$ ‍		$8,$ ‍		$13, …$ ‍

So we simply add that difference to find that the next term is

18

	$+ 5 ↷$ ‍		$+ 5 ↷$ ‍		$+ 5 ↷$ ‍
$3,$ ‍		$8,$ ‍		$13,$ ‍		$18, …$ ‍

Problem 1

What is the next term in the sequence $- 5, - 1, 3, 7, \dots$ ‍?

Want to try more problems like this? Check out this exercise.

Writing recursive formulas

Suppose we want to write a recursive formula for

3, 8, 13, …

We already know the common difference is

+ 5

. We can also see that the first term is

3

. Therefore, this is a recursive formula for the sequence:

{\begin{cases} a (1) = 3 \\ a (n) = a (n - 1) + 5 \end{cases}

Problem 1

Find $k$ ‍ and $d$ ‍ in this recursive formula of the sequence $- 5, - 1, 3, 7, \dots$ ‍.

{\begin{cases} a (1) = k \\ a (n) = a (n - 1) + d \end{cases}

k =

d =

Want to try more problems like this? Check out this exercise.

Writing explicit formulas

Suppose we want to write an explicit formula for

3, 8, 13, …

We already know the common difference is

+ 5

and the first term is

3

. Therefore, this is an explicit formula for the sequence:

a (n) = 3 + 5 (n - 1)

Problem 1

Write an explicit formula for $- 5, - 1, 3, 7, \dots$ ‍

a (n) =

Want to try more problems like this? Check out this exercise.

Want to join the conversation?

Sort by:

Robert Bass
Posted 6 years ago. Direct link to Robert Bass's post “How do you write an expli...”
How do you write an explicit formula for the sequence (8,11,16,23,32)
Button navigates to signup pageComment on Robert Bass's post “How do you write an expli...”
(7 votes)
Answer
- Tahlequah
  Posted 5 years ago. Direct link to Tahlequah 's post “Notice that the sequence ...”
  Notice that the sequence of differences is simply the sequence of odd numbers. So this is the sequence of squares shifted by a constant. Since 8-1=7, we have
  a(n) = n^2 +7
  Comment on Tahlequah 's post “Notice that the sequence ...”
  (8 votes)
lindah17
Posted 6 years ago. Direct link to lindah17's post “Why was the Arithmetic Se...”
Why was the Arithmetic Sequence review so hard on my mind? It took me to look at the explanation to understand the answers to every darn question. And, I am yet so confused on this section.
Button navigates to signup pageComment on lindah17's post “Why was the Arithmetic Se...”
(8 votes)
Answer
- Wang Jing
  Posted 3 years ago. Direct link to Wang Jing's post “you can check ncert (cbse...”
  you can check ncert (cbse)textbook math grade 10 and find the chapter Arithmetic progression.That might help.
  Comment on Wang Jing's post “you can check ncert (cbse...”
  (1 vote)
busygirl022705
Posted 5 years ago. Direct link to busygirl022705's post “How would you find the ex...”
How would you find the explicit formula for a problem such as:
"a" subscript 38 =-53.2, while the common difference is -1.1?
Button navigates to signup pageButton navigates to signup page
(2 votes)
Answer
- David Lee
  Posted 5 years ago. Direct link to David Lee's post “You need to know a common...”
  You need to know a common difference and one 'value' (sequence) in order to find the general form (formula). Since the common difference is -1.1, it would look like this: -1.1(n-1) + b (if you are starting from n=1).
  Then plug in "a" subscript 38 = -53.2 into the formula. Then it would be -1.1(38-1) + b = -53.2
  All you have to do is solving for 'b' and it would be -12.5.
  Therefore, the general form (formula) would be -1.1(n-1) - 12.5 if you are starting from n=1.
  Comment on David Lee's post “You need to know a common...”
  (4 votes)
Levi Dawit
Posted 6 years ago. Direct link to Levi Dawit's post “When given an arithmetic ...”
When given an arithmetic sequence with a negative term, how do you calculate what term the number will be when it reaches 0?
Button navigates to signup pageButton navigates to signup page
(2 votes)
Answer
- David Severin
  Posted 6 years ago. Direct link to David Severin's post “Some sequences do not eve...”
  Some sequences do not even have 0 as one of the possibilities. So if you start with a negative and have a negative common difference, then there is no zero such as -2, -4, -6, -8, ... Others will have a common difference that skips over zero such as -4, 4, 12, 20, 28, ... If the sequence does include a zero, such as an initial value of - 9 and a common difference of 3, we get an equation f(n) = -9 + 3(n-1). set this equal to zero, 0 = -9 + 3(n-1) move the - 9 by adding and distribute to get 9 = 3n - 3, add 3 to both sides, 3n = 12., divide by 3 to get n = 4. Sequence would be -9, -6, -3, 0 ... which is what we were looking for. So if your equation skipped 0 as above f(n) = -4 +8(n-1) and did the same thing, then 0 = -4 + 8n - 8, add 12 to get 12 = 8n, n = 12/8 = 3/2, but a sequence does not have a 3/2 term, only 1, 2, 3 ... terms.
  Comment on David Severin's post “Some sequences do not eve...”
  (4 votes)
isabella.knight
Posted 5 years ago. Direct link to isabella.knight's post “how are the formulas for ...”
how are the formulas for arithmetic sequences similar to functions?
Button navigates to signup pageButton navigates to signup page
(2 votes)
Answer
- David Severin
  Posted 5 years ago. Direct link to David Severin's post “Arithmetic sequences are ...”
  Arithmetic sequences are functions. The difference between a linear function and a arithmetic sequence is that the first is continuous and the second is discrete, but the continuous line would go through all the points of its equivalent sequence.
  Button navigates to signup page
  (4 votes)
rmikush
Posted 4 years ago. Direct link to rmikush's post “how do you write a recurs...”
how do you write a recursive formula for 1, 1, 0, -1, -1, 0, 1, 1
Button navigates to signup pageComment on rmikush's post “how do you write a recurs...”
(3 votes)
Answer
Valarie Torres
Posted 4 years ago. Direct link to Valarie Torres's post “Consider the arithmetic s...”
Consider the arithmetic sequence 27, 13, -1, ...
The explicit rule for the sequence in terms of n is a(n)= 27-14(n-1). If the nth term is -841, find the value of n.
Button navigates to signup pageButton navigates to signup page
(2 votes)
Answer
- Kim Seidel
  Posted 4 years ago. Direct link to Kim Seidel's post “If the nth term is -841, ...”
  If the nth term is -841, then you were just given the result. Basically a(n)=-841
  So, change the equation into -841=27-14(n-1).
  You can now solve for n.
  Hope this helps.
  Button navigates to signup page
  (1 vote)
468234
Posted 2 years ago. Direct link to 468234's post “How would you write a exp...”
How would you write a explicit formula when f(0)=5, f(x)=f(x-1)+(2x-1)?
Button navigates to signup pageButton navigates to signup page
(2 votes)
Answer
Benjamin Araujo
Posted 10 months ago. Direct link to Benjamin Araujo's post “which formula is more sui...”
which formula is more suitable to use recursive or explicit?
Button navigates to signup pageButton navigates to signup page
(1 vote)
Answer
- David Severin
  Posted 10 months ago. Direct link to David Severin's post “Most of the time, explici...”
  Most of the time, explicit has more power, but for a few occasions such as the Fibonacci sequence, the recursive is more applicable. The explicit equation is closer to the slope intercept form of the line that would go through all the poins of a particular arithmetic sequence.
  Comment on David Severin's post “Most of the time, explici...”
  (2 votes)
Fatima
Posted 10 months ago. Direct link to Fatima's post “how do I find out what th...”
how do I find out what the sequence pattern is with only knowing term 1 and 5 for example
Button navigates to signup pageButton navigates to signup page
(1 vote)
Answer
- RIFT
  Posted 8 months ago. Direct link to RIFT's post “the same way you find the...”
  the same way you find the slope of a line with two points,
  if a(1) = 10
  and a(5) = 32
  then the common difference is
  (32-10)/(5-1) = 22/4 = 5.5.
  so the explicit formula would be 10+7*(n-1)
  Comment on RIFT's post “the same way you find the...”
  (2 votes)

Integrated math 1

Course: Integrated math 1 > Unit 12

Arithmetic sequences review

Parts and formulas of arithmetic sequences

Extending arithmetic sequences

Writing recursive formulas

Writing explicit formulas

Want to join the conversation?