Main content

### Course: Integrated math 1 > Unit 2

Lesson 2: Linear equations with parentheses# Reasoning with linear equations

When we perform operations to manipulate equations, some operations produce equivalent equations, while others don't necessarily produce equivalent equations. When we're solving an equation, we need to use operations that guarantee equivalence. Created by Sal Khan.

## Want to join the conversation?

- What makes a number a non zero constant?(18 votes)
- Basically what he is saying is that you can divide it by any number that isnt zero. From 1 to 999999999 (and beyond), you can divide it, as long as it isn't zero. Hopefully that helped.(42 votes)

- hey whats up everyone just saying have a good day(34 votes)
- goodday!

I find it funny that i accidentally repost something and I get a message from *A_Guardian but this doesn't for months lol :D(2 votes)

- Really, this video has no reason to be7:40long. He literally solved the question at2:58, why does the video have to continue after that.(14 votes)
- he needs to explain it more for people that wouldn't understand if it were put into a different equation.(3 votes)

- sorry if he explained it in the video, but what does equivalence preserving mean?(1 vote)
- Equivalence preserving means to keep the equation the same as it was before you did an operation. For example, in the video, Sal referred to the equation 2x+3=9. By subtracting 3 from both sides, he got the equation 2x=6, which is actually the same thing as 2x+3=9 and so that is what equivalence preserving means. Hope that helps!(16 votes)

- In am equation which one is the solution and how can you tell if two equations are equivalent .(4 votes)
- "Two is not zero" thanks sal.(5 votes)
- What if I have 2 equations like...

A: 5x = 3x

B: 5 = 3

Since I need to divide both sides by x, wouldn't they be equivalent? How is this a non-preserving operation?(0 votes)- Interesting question!

The problematic issue is the possibility of dividing both sides by zero. When you divide both sides by an expression or variable that**could be zero**, you can lose solutions! Note that 5x = 3x has the solution x = 0, while 5 = 3 has no solutions.

Have a blessed, wonderful day!(10 votes)

- why is this video so long(1 vote)
- To "deepen" our understanding on equivalence(6 votes)

- 0 is equal to 0?? thanks for this eye opening information sal!(3 votes)
- If the equation is not as simple as 5x = 6x. Why can I not subtract the x from both sides? it is the same result as dividing by X!(3 votes)
- You can't subtract because technically 5x and 6c are both multiplication problems (like 5(6) or 34(5)) So in order to get x by itself you would reverse operation it which would be dividing. Hope that you understand the topic now.(1 vote)

## Video transcript

- [Instructor] In many other videos, we've taken equations like this and tried to quote solve for X. What we're gonna do in
this video is deepen our understanding a little
bit about what's going on and really think about
the notion of equivalence or equivalence statements. So let me write that down, equivalence. Now, what do I mean by equivalence? Well, I'll use this equation here to essentially keep rewriting
it in equivalent ways and I'll talk a little bit
more about what that means. So one thing that I
could do to essentially write the same equivalence statement is I could distribute
this three onto the X or onto the X plus one
and then this part of it could be rewritten as three X plus three and then we have minus X is equal to nine. Now, what I will say or what
it might be obvious to you on some level is this top equation and this second equation are equivalent. What does that mean? It means if one of them
is true for given X, the other one will be true
for that same X as well, and vice versa and we can write other equivalence statements. For example, if we were
to combine X terms, if we were to take three
X and then minus X, right over there, I could
rewrite that as two X and then I have plus
three is equal to nine. Now all three of these
statements are equivalent. If there's an X where two times that X plus three is equal to nine, then it is also the case that
three times that X plus one minus X is equal to nine and vice versa. If there's some X that would
make this top equation true then it's going to make
this last equation true. And we can do other equivalence
preserving operations and you've seen them before. You could subtract three from both sides. In general, if you are adding
or subtracting the same value from both sides, it is
equivalence preserving. If you're distributing a value like we did in that first step that
is equivalence preserving. If you combine like terms so to speak, that is equivalence preserving and so here we'll do an
equivalence preserving operation. We'll subtract three from both sides and you would get two X is equal to six and once again, any X that
satisfies this last equation will satisfy any of the other
equations and vice versa. Any X that's satisfies any
of these other equations will satisfy this last one and so they are all
equivalent to each other. And then another equivalence
preserving operation is to multiply or divide both
sides by a non zero constant. And so here we could
divide both sides by two, two is not zero and it's constant and if we did that, we will get
another equivalent statement that X is equal to three. So any X that satisfies this
and there's one, X equals three would satisfy the other ones
and any X that satisfies any of the other ones
would satisfy this last one so these are all equivalent. So one way to think about it, adding the same number to
both sides of an equation that is equivalence preserving. Multiply or dividing both sides
by a non-zero constant value is equivalence preserving. Distributing like we
did in this first step equivalence preserving,
combining like terms equivalence preserving. Now you're probably saying, well, what are some non
equivalence preserving operations? Well, imagine something like this, lemme just start with
something very obvious. If I said that X is equal to two a non equivalence preserving operation is if I were to add or
subtract or multiply or divide only one side of this equation by a value let's say I only added
one to the left side. Then I would have X
plus one is equal to two and it is not the case that
anything that satisfies this second equation
satisfies the top equation or vice versa. X equals two clearly
satisfies the top equation but it doesn't satisfy the second one, that's because we did a non equivalence preserving operation. Likewise, if I only multiplied
the right hand side by three, I would get X is equal to six. Well, by only multiplying
the right hand side by value it's not the case that anything
that satisfies X equals six will satisfy X equals two,
that is somewhat obvious here. Now there's a little
bit trickier scenarios, let's say we have the equation
five X is equal to six X. Now, one temptation is, well,
I wanna do the same thing to both sides, I could just
divide both sides by X, what'll happen in that scenario? Well, if you divide both sides by X you could think that an
equivalence statement is that five is equal to six
and you know that there's no X for which five is equal to six. You can't make five equal
six or six equal five and so this would somehow
make you imply that okay, there's no X that can satisfy. If you assume that these
were equivalence statements, you'd say there's nothing that
could satisfy five equal six so maybe there's nothing that
satisfies this top equation. But this actually isn't an
equivalence preserving operation because you're actually
dealing with a scenario where X is equal to zero
and you're dividing by zero. And so you have to be very careful when you're dividing by a variable, especially if the variable
that makes that equation true happens to be zero. And so in order to be clear that you're preserving equivalence here, the way that I would tackle it is I would subtract five X from both sides and if you do that, and
that is an equivalence preserving operation, you
could subtract that expression from both sides or that
term from both sides and then you would be left
with zero is equal to X and now zero equals X
and five X equals six X, these are equivalence statements. They are equivalent equations anything that makes this
one true is going to make that one true and anyone
that makes that one true is going to make this one true. Now one last thing you
might have heard me say, you can multiply or
divide by non-zero value and that's going to be
equivalence preserving. And hopefully you've just got a sense of why dividing by zero
is not a good idea. In fact, dividing by zero
is always going to be a strange thing and it's undefined, but also multiplying by zero. For example, if I had, let's say, actually lemme start over here. If I had two X is equal to
six, and if I were to multiply both sides by zero, I would
get zero is equal to zero and zero equals zero is true for any X. Zero is always going to be equal to zero but the problem is, is that
first statement isn't true for all X it's only
true for X equals three. So these two are not
equivalent statements. They have a different set
of Xs that will satisfy them and so you have to be very
careful when you're dealing with things that are either are zero you can add or subtract zeros, obviously that's not
gonna change things much, but when you multiply both sides by zero, you can start getting things that are not equivalence statements and when you multiply or divide by things that could be zero, like variables, that also is a dangerous game to play.