- Motion problems with integrals: displacement vs. distance
- Analyzing motion problems: position
- Analyzing motion problems: total distance traveled
- Motion problems (with definite integrals)
- Analyzing motion problems (integral calculus)
- Worked example: motion problems (with definite integrals)
- Motion problems (with integrals)
- Average acceleration over interval
Finding the appropriate expression to use when looking for the total distance traveled over a certain time interval.
Want to join the conversation?
- I'm confused. Why can't the answer be option D?(3 votes)
- It has to be the absolute value of the function because the question is asking for the total distance traveled. If it asked for the displacement, then it wouldn't need absolute value.
Let's say the object traveled from 5 meters, to 8 meters, back to 5 meters from t=2 to t=6. If we didn't take the absolute value of the integral, it would be zero meaning the object didn't move. However, we know it did move a total of 6 meters, so we have to take the absolute value to show distance traveled.(5 votes)
- If we evaluate the integral, we see the particles distance from starting point isnt actually 5, is it ?(3 votes)
- 8:43am. How would you find the maximum and minimum distance traveled using a table when velocity and time are provided?
This is an example problem:
Time (sec) 0 2 4 6
Velocity (ft/sec) 5 15 25 20(1 vote)
- [Instructor] Alexey received the following problem: A particle moves in a straight line with velocity v of t is equal to negative t squared plus eight meters per second, where t is time in seconds. At t is equal to two, the particle's distance from the starting point was five meters. What is the total distance the particle has traveled between t equals two and t equals six seconds? Which expression should Alexey use to solve the problem? So we don't actually have to figure the actual answer out, we just have to figure out what is the appropriate expression. So like always, pause this video and see if you can work through it on your own. So now let's tackle this together. So the key question is what is the total distance the particle has traveled between t equals two and t equals six? So we just care what happens between those points, we don't care that the particle's distance from the starting point was five meters at t equals two. So this right over here is actually unnecessary information. So the first thing that you might wanna think about is well maybe distance is just the integral of the velocity function; We've seen that multiple times. If you want to find the change in a quantity, you just say the starting time and the ending time and then you integrate the rate function. So wouldn't it just be that? Now we have to be very very careful. If the question was what is the displacement for the particle between time equals two and time equals six, this would have been the correct answer. So this would be displacement. Displacement from t equals two to t is equal to six. But they're not saying displacement. They're saying total distance the particle has traveled. So this is the total path length for the particle. So one way to think about it, you would integrate not the velocity function, if you integrate velocity, you get displacement, instead, you would integrate the speed function. Now what is speed? It is the magnitude of velocity and in one dimension, it would just be the absolute value of your velocity function. And so the absolute value of the velocity function, this would give you, integrating the speed, this would give you the distance. Distance from t equals two to t is equal to six, and let's see, we have that choice right over here. The displacement one here, this is an interesting distracter but that is not going to be the choice. This one right over here, v prime of six, that gives you the acceleration. If you're taking the derivative of the velocity function, the acceleration at six seconds, that's not what we're interested in. And this gives you the absolute difference in velocity, when in between time six and time two, that's not what we're trying to figure out either.