Proving that an inscribed angle is half of a central angle that subtends the same arc. Created by Sal Khan.
Want to join the conversation?
- Could you do a problem like this with different variables?
Like, instead of Psi and Theta, could you use x and y?(25 votes)
- Yes, you can use whichever variables you like. But x and y are commonly used to indicate lengths, and psi and theta are commonly used to indicate angles, so that's what Sal has done.(56 votes)
- At8:22how do you know psi 1 is = to 1/2 beta 1, and same for psi 2 and beta 2?(23 votes)
- At6:00minutes of this video Sal proves psi = 1/2 beta when one ray is a diameter, in the example you're asking about he creates a diameter so he can use this result to know Psi 1 = 1/2 beta 1 and the same for psi 2 and beta 2.(28 votes)
- I had a question about theta. If someone draws the symbol theta would you draw the line that goes in the center only as long as the radus or to the diameter? Thank you very much.(4 votes)
- Theta is simply a variable that he uses to describe one of the two types of angles used in the above video: central angles. The symbol theta has no meaning specific to the concept discussed in the above video; like Psi, which he uses to indicate the inscribed angles, the Theta symbol is used to represent something, therefore it is not how the symbol is drawn that matters--it is what the symbol represents that matters.(24 votes)
- At0:11and0:45, Sal says "vertex", what does that mean?(7 votes)
- The Vertex is the point where the two line segments meet. So at00:11when he points to the vertex he is staying, the place where the two line segments meet, which is on the circumference of the circle(16 votes)
- Wait, in that third situation, what garuntee do you have that si 2 = theta 2? There are three triangles in that part of the video (at11:25) and in the other parts, then there are two triangles? It doesn't really make much sense.(10 votes)
- he's taking from the first example- if one of the chords of the angle is the diameter then we already know that psi= 1/2theta, we already proved that. so using that we know that psi2=½(theta2) and we can and since the huge angle we made also has one of the chords on the diameter, we can state that psi1+psi2=½(theta1+theta2). Since we know that psi2=1/2theta1, we can plug it in and now we have psi1+1/2theta1=½theta1 +½ theta2 and the term 1/2theta1 cancels from both sides and you are left with psi1=1/2theta1, which are the two measurements we were looking for.Hope this helps.(9 votes)
- I don't get it... why not just use X or Z?(3 votes)
- Because X and Z are for algebra. psi (but the p is silent) and theta. They're just variable traditionally used for angles( they are Greek letters)(5 votes)
- Learning Proofs are the best. I find they are often better than practice questions for remembering a theorem.Is there like a course on proofs on Khan Academy?(5 votes)
- I still don't understand really much am still struggling to do the math need help.(2 votes)
- What does Sal mean by the term, "subtended"?(3 votes)
• (of a line, arc, or figure) form (an angle) at a particular point when straight lines from its extremities are joined at that point.(3 votes)
- how does he know psi 1 equal 1/2 theta 1 at8:15in the vidio? i didn't undrstand the proof. i don't think i saw a proof. like wise for scy 2 and thaita 2 at8:20(3 votes)
- I know that it has been seven years, but the reason how he proves it is in his words. at8:04, he says something along the lines of, based on the results I got. Which means we have to use the first proof to solve the second. This means that when we make the diameter across the circle, what it creates is a triangle with two sides equal to the radius. For example psi one, has one radius spanning towards the center, and another side which comes from the center of the circle to another point of the circumference of the circle. Because of this, that side along the ray bordering theta 1 is equal to the radius. Now, because both sides are to one radius, it means that the triangle is an isosceles triangle, therefore having two equal base angles. I will use, "x" to represent them. And since theta 1 can be used to create one 180 degree line on the diameter in the triangle which has psi one is present, using the angle left of theta 1, it means the angle which is to the left of theta 1, on the diameter is equal to 180-theta. This then means that the triangle with psi one present means that 2x+(180-theta)=180. Follow the same steps as in proof 1, and you recieve 2psi=theta. In this case, it means that theta 1 is double than the angle measure of psi one. This is how Sal comes to his conclusion(3 votes)
What I want to do in this video is to prove one of the more useful results in geometry, and that's that an inscribed angle is just an angle who's vertex sits on the circumference of the circle. So that is our inscribed angle. I'll denote it by si -- I'll use the si for inscribed angle and angles in this video. That si, the inscribed angle, is going to be exactly 1/2 of the central angle that subtends the same arc. So I just used a lot a fancy words, but I think you'll get what I'm saying. So this is si. It is an inscribed angle. It sits, it's vertex sits on the circumference. And if you draw out the to rays that come out from this angle or the two cords that define this angle, it intersects the circle at the other end. And if you look at the part of the circumference of the circle that's inside of it, that is the arc that is subtended by si. It's all very fancy words, but I think the idea is pretty straightforward. This right here is the arc subtended by si, where si is that inscribed angle right over there, the vertex sitting on the circumference. Now, a central angle is an angle where the vertex is sitting at the center of the circle. So let's say that this right here -- I'll try to eyeball it -- that right there is the center of the circle. So let me draw a central angle that subtends this same arc. So that looks like a central angle subtending that same arc. Just like that. Let's call this theta. So this angle is si, this angle right here is theta. When I'm going to prove in this video is that si is always going to be equal to 1/2 of theta. So if I were to tell you that si is equal to, I don't know, 25 degrees, then you would immediately know that theta must be equal to 50 degrees. Or if I told you that theta was 80 degrees, then you would immediately know that si was 40 degrees. So let's actually proved this. So let me clear this. So a good place to start, or the place I'm going to start, is a special case. I'm going to draw an inscribed angle, but one of the cords that define it is going to be the diameter of the circle. So this isn't going to be the general case, this is going to be a special case. So let me see, this is the center right here of my circle. I'm trying to eyeball it. Center looks like that. So let me draw a diameter. So the diameter looks like that. Then let me define my inscribed angle. This diameter is one side of it. And then the other side maybe is just like that. So let me call this right here si. If that's si, this length right here is a radius -- that's our radius of our circle. Then this length right here is also going to be the radius of our circle going from the center to the circumference. Your circumference is defined by all of the points that are exactly a radius away from the center. So that's also a radius. Now, this triangle right here is an isosceles triangle. It has two sides that are equal. Two sides that are definitely equal. We know that when we have two sides being equal, their base angles are also equal. So this will also be equal to si. You might not recognize it because it's tilted up like that. But I think many of us when we see a triangle that looks like this, if I told you this is r and that is r, that these two sides are equal, and if this is si, then you would also know that this angle is also going to be si. Base angles are equivalent on an isosceles triangle. So this is si, that is also si. Now, let me look at the central angle. This is the central angle subtending the same arc. Let's highlight the arc that they're both subtending. This right here is the arc that they're both going to subtend. So this is my central angle right there, theta. Now if this angle is theta, what's this angle going to be? This angle right here. Well, this angle is supplementary to theta, so it's 180 minus theta. When you add these two angles together you go 180 degrees around or the kind of formal line. They're supplementary to each other. Now we also know that these three angles are sitting inside of the same triangle. So they must add up to 180 degrees. So we get si -- this si plus that si plus si plus this angle, which is 180 minus theta plus 180 minus theta. These three angles must add up to 180 degrees. They're the three angles of a triangle. Now we could subtract 180 from both sides. Si plus si is 2 si minus theta is equal to 0. Add theta to both sides. You get 2 si is equal to theta. Multiply both sides by 1/2 or divide both sides by 2. You get si is equal to 1/2 of theta. So we just proved what we set out to prove for the special case where our inscribed angle is defined, where one on the rays, if you want to view these lines as rays, where one of the rays that defines this inscribed angle is along the diameter. The diameter forms part of that ray. So this is a special case where one edge is sitting on the diameter. So already we could generalize this. So now that we know that if this is 50 that this is going to be 100 degrees and likewise, right? Whatever si is or whatever theta is, si's going to be 1/2 of that, or whatever si is, theta is going to be 2 times that. And now this will apply for any time. We could use this notion any time that -- so just using that result we just got, we can now generalize it a little bit, although this won't apply to all inscribed angles. Let's have an inscribed angle that looks like this. So this situation, the center, you can kind of view it as it's inside of the angle. That's my inscribed angle. And I want to find a relationship between this inscribed angle and the central angle that's subtending to same arc. So that's my central angle subtending the same arc. Well, you might say, hey, gee, none of these ends or these cords that define this angle, neither of these are diameters, but what we can do is we can draw a diameter. If the center is within these two cords we can draw a diameter. We can draw a diameter just like that. If we draw a diameter just like that, if we define this angle as si 1, that angle as si 2. Clearly si is the sum of those two angles. And we call this angle theta 1, and this angle theta 2. We immediately you know that, just using the result I just got, since we have one side of our angles in both cases being a diameter now, we know that si 1 is going to be equal to 1/2 theta 1. And we know that si 2 is going to be 1/2 theta 2. Si 2 is going to be 1/2 theta 2. So si, which is si 1 plus si 2, so si 1 plus si 2 is going to be equal to these two things. 1/2 theta 1 plus 1/2 theta 2. Si 1 plus si 2, this is equal to the first inscribed angle that we want to deal with, just regular si. That's si. And this right here, this is equal to 1/2 times theta 1 plus theta 2. What's theta 1 plus theta 2? Well that's just our original theta that we were dealing with. So now we see that si is equal to 1/2 theta. So now we've proved it for a slightly more general case where our center is inside of the two rays that define that angle. Now, we still haven't addressed a slightly harder situation or a more general situation where if this is the center of our circle and I have an inscribed angle where the center isn't sitting inside of the two cords. Let me draw that. So that's going to be my vertex, and I'll switch colors, so let's say that is one of the cords that defines the angle, just like that. And let's say that is the other cord that defines the angle just like that. So how do we find the relationship between, let's call, this angle right here, let's call it si 1. How do we find the relationship between si 1 and the central angle that subtends this same arc? So when I talk about the same arc, that's that right there. So the central angle that subtends the same arc will look like this. Let's call that theta 1. What we can do is use what we just learned when one side of our inscribed angle is a diameter. So let's construct that. So let me draw a diameter here. The result we want still is that this should be 1/2 of this, but let's prove it. Let's draw a diameter just like that. Let me call this angle right here, let me call that si 2. And it is subtending this arc right there -- let me do that in a darker color. It is subtending this arc right there. So the central angle that subtends that same arc, let me call that theta 2. Now, we know from the earlier part of this video that si 2 is going to be equal to 1/2 theta 2, right? They share -- the diameter is right there. The diameter is one of the cords that forms the angle. So si 2 is going to be equal to 1/2 theta 2. This is exactly what we've been doing in the last video, right? This is an inscribed angle. One of the cords that define is sitting on the diameter. So this is going to be 1/2 of this angle, of the central angle that subtends the same arc. Now, let's look at this larger angle. This larger angle right here. Si 1 plus si 2. Right, that larger angle is si 1 plus si 2. Once again, this subtends this entire arc right here, and it has a diameter as one of the cords that defines this huge angle. So this is going to be 1/2 of the central angle that subtends the same arc. We're just using what we've already shown in this video. So this is going to be equal to 1/2 of this huge central angle of theta 1 plus theta 2. So far we've just used everything that we've learned earlier in this video. Now, we already know that si 2 is equal to 1/2 theta 2. So let me make that substitution. This is equal to that. So we can say that si 1 plus -- instead of si 2 I'll write 1/2 theta 2 is equal to 1/2 theta 1 plus 1/2 theta 2. We can subtract 1/2 theta 2 from both sides, and we get our result. Si 1 is equal to 1/2 theta one. And now we're done. We have proven the situation that the inscribed angle is always 1/2 of the central angle that subtends the same arc, regardless of whether the center of the circle is inside of the angle, outside of the angle, whether we have a diameter on one side. So any other angle can be constructed as a sum of any or all of these that we've already done. So hopefully you found this useful and now we can actually build on this result to do some more interesting geometry proofs.