Main content

### Course: Geometry (FL B.E.S.T.) > Unit 9

Lesson 5: Cavalieri's principle and dissection methods- Cavalieri's principle in 2D
- Cavalieri's principle in 3D
- Cavalieri's principle in 3D
- Apply Cavalieri's principle
- Volume of pyramids intuition
- Volume of a pyramid or cone
- Volumes of cones intuition
- Using related volumes
- Use related volumes
- Volume of prisms and pyramids

© 2024 Khan AcademyTerms of usePrivacy PolicyCookie Notice

# Cavalieri's principle in 3D

Cavalieri's principle tells us that if 2 figures have the same height and the same cross-sectional area at every point along that height, they have the same volume. Created by Sal Khan.

## Want to join the conversation?

- If the volume is the same, does that mean that the surface area is also the same?(10 votes)
- No. Just like how you can have a 9x4 rectangle and a 12x3 rectangle with the same area but different perimeter, it's completely possible to have solids with the same volume and different surface area, and vice versa.(24 votes)

- Is there a simulator for this that I can see myself?(3 votes)
- Hi James, yes, there is!

Here's the link:

https://www.khanacademy.org/computer-programming/cavalieri-principle-wsliders/5503479746002944

~Hannah(13 votes)

- Is it true that in order for 2 spheres to satisfy Cavalieri's principle, the only constraint is for them to have the same radius?(4 votes)
- If two spheres have the same radius, they are both going to be the same size and shape, and therefore they would both have the same volume.(8 votes)

- Can the figure be infinitely skewed? I'm having trouble imagining the following:

Two identical cylinders, A and B, with same height and same base. Then we skew the bottom of cylinder A to the right by a mile. Compared to cylinder B, cylinder A has the same height as B and both have the same cross sectional area along that height, so they still meet Cavalieri's Principle and thus have the same volume.

Yet, my intuition says that cylinder A, which has been skewed by a mile, could hold way more water inside itself as cylinder B, so it should have a greater volume!

How to solve that apparent contradiction?(3 votes)- Yes, it may seem a little counter-intuitive, but the more you skew the cylinder, the thinner it gets, and the skew has no bearing on the actual volume.(5 votes)

- Hello, what is that platform called that you are using.(3 votes)
- if the volume is the same does that mean that the surface area is also the same(2 votes)
- Well if the volume is the same, it doesn’t necessarily mean the surface area has to be the same. To keep it simple, use this example:

1. You have 2 rectangles (one named “A” and one named “B”

2. The Area Of Rectangle A and B is 100

3. The 2 side lengths of Rectangle A is 4 and 25

4. The 2 side lengths of Rectangle B is 10 and 10

5. Both have the same area, but different Perimeters. Rectangle A has a perimeter of 58, and Rectangle B has a perimeter of 40.

6. Therefore they have same area but different perimeters.

7. This is the same relationship as between Volume (as area) and Surface Area (as Perimeter)(4 votes)

- If two figures have the same height, the same cross-sectional area at every point along that height, and the same volume, then they are the exact same figure, right?(2 votes)
- Not necessarily. Cavalieri's principle is that the shapes can vary, but the properties will remain intact. For example, if you stack 4 quarters on top of each other, they would be the same height, volume, and cross sectional area, but not be the same exact shape.(2 votes)

- 2, 3, 7, 23, then a humongous number that I don't care to count. 2, 6, a humongous number that I don't care to count. 2, 9, 2, a humongous number that I don't care to count. 2, 5, 21+, a humongous number that I don't care to count.(2 votes)
- So technically if you were to skew two of the same exact shapes, you would have to cut it into chips. You couldn't just stretch it to the right or left without slicing it? I was wondering, because if you skewed it to the right without cutting it, wouldn't that increase the volume?

Say you have two cylinders of the same height and cross-sectional area. You fill them with water. If you stretch the one on the right to the right, without cutting it, wouldn't it increase the volume?

Essentially, my question is, in order to use Cavalieri's Principle, the shapes must be cut before skewed?(2 votes)- So, from what I understand, you wouldn't have to cut the shape before skewing, as long as the material itself isn't stretching, as in, say, a ball of putty.

Here's another way to think about. Due to the way the principle works, there isn't a limit to how many "cuts" you can make, as Sal was essentially showing. So you could make an infinite amount of cuts, then skew it, but since the number of cross-sectional cuts is infinite, it would be the same as just skewing it without cutting, like you were describing.

The reason the volume doesn't change is because as another poster showed, the more you skew the shape, the diameter perpendicular to the slant edge of the shape grows smaller. Thus, while the surface area grows, the volume stays the same.

If you were to think about it in a 2D way, a parallelogram with a height of 5 and a base of 10 always has the same volume as a rectangle with the height of 5 and a base of 10, no matter how steep the angles are. I hope that helps!(1 vote)

- Sal kept saying if they have the same area at 'any' point, then the have the same volume, but isn't it more correct to say if the same area at 'every' point? Maybe not that different but I was confused at first.(2 votes)

## Video transcript

- [Instructor] So we
have two cylinders here. Let's say we know that they
have the exact same volume and that makes sense because it looks like they have the same area of their base and they have the same height. Now what I'm going to
do is start cutting up this left cylinder here
and shifting things around. So if I just cut it in two
and take that bottom cylinder, that bottom half and shift it a bit, have I changed its volume? Well, clearly I have
not changed its volume. I still have the same volume. The combined volume of both
of these half cylinders, I could say, are equal
to the original cylinder. Now what if I were to cut it up even more? So let me cut it up now into three. Well, once again I still haven't
changed my original volume. It's still the same volume as original and I just cut it up into thirds. And if I shift them around a little bit I'm not changing the volume. And I could keep doing that. I could cut it up into a bunch of them. Notice, this still has
the same original volume, I've just cut it up into
a bunch of sections. I've cut it horizontally and now I'm just shifting things around, but that doesn't change the volume. And I can do it a bunch of times. This looks like some type of
poker chips or gambling chips where I can have my original cylinder and now I've cut it horizontally into a bunch of these, I
guess you could say chips but clearly it has the
same combined volume. I can shift it around a bit
but it has the same volume. And this leads us to
an interesting question and it's actually a principle known as Cavalieri's principle, which is if I have two figures
that have the same height and at any point along that height, the cross-sectional area is the same, then the two figures have the same volume. Now how does what I just say
apply to what's going on here? Well, clearly both of these
figures have the same height and then at any point here,
wherever I did the cuts, at the same point on
this original cylinder, well, my cross-sectional
area is going to be the same because it's going to be the same area as the base in the case of this cylinder and so it meets Cavalieri's principle. But Cavalieri's
principle's nothing exotic. It comes straight out of common sense. I can just do more cuts like this and you can see that I have, you can see a more continuous
looking skewed cylinder but this will have the same
volume as our original cylinder. When I shift it around like this, it's not changing the volume. And that's not just true for cylinders. I could do the exact same argument with some form of a prism. Once again they have the same volume. I could shift, I could
cut the left one in half and shift it around,
doesn't change its volume. I could cut it more
and shift those around, still doesn't change the volume. So Cavalieri's principle
seems to make a lot of intuitive sense here. If I have two figures
that have the same height and at any point along that height, the cross-sectional area is the same, then the figures have the same volume. So these figures also
have the same volume. And I could do it with interesting things like, say, a pyramid. These two pyramids have the same volume and I were to cut the left pyramid halfway along its height and
shift the bottom like this, that doesn't change its volume. And I can keep doing that
with more and more cuts. And 'cause at any point here, these figures have the same height and at any point on that height, the cross-sectional area is the same, and so they have the same volume. But once again it is intuitive. And it goes all the way to
the case where you have, you could view it as a continuous
pyramid right over here that has been skewed. So no matter how much you skew it, it's gonna have the same
volume as our original pyramid 'cause they have the same height. And the cross-sectional area
at any point in the height is going to be the same. We can actually do this with any figure. So these spheres have the same volume. I could cut the left one in half, halfway along its height
and shift it like this. Clearly, I'm not changing the volume. And I could make more cuts like that. And clearly it has still the same volume. And this meets Cavalieri's principle because they have the same height and the cross section at
any point along that height is going to be the same. So even though I can cut that
one up and I can shift it, it looks like a different type of object, a different type of thing, but they have the same
height and cross sections at any point are the same area, so we have the same volume, which is a useful thing to know not just to know the principle but hopefully this video helps you gain some of the intuition for
why it makes intuitive sense.