Main content

### Course: Precalculus (Eureka Math/EngageNY) > Unit 4

Lesson 2: Topic A: Lessons 3-4: Addition and subtraction formulas- Trig angle addition identities
- Using the cosine angle addition identity
- Using the cosine double-angle identity
- Using the trig angle addition identities
- Proof of the sine angle addition identity
- Proof of the cosine angle addition identity
- Finding trig values using angle addition identities
- Find trig values using angle addition identities

© 2024 Khan AcademyTerms of usePrivacy PolicyCookie Notice

# Using the cosine angle addition identity

Sal evaluates the cosine of the sum of 60° and another angle whose right triangle is given. To do this, he must use the cosine angle addition formula. Created by Sal Khan.

## Want to join the conversation?

- At3:10, when finding the cosine of 60 degrees, and at3:54. when finding the sine of 60 degrees, why do you use the example triangle that you drew? Why not just use the triangle given with the problem?(14 votes)
- The triangle given in the problem doesn't have a 60 degree angle.(40 votes)

- Why can you not just say that the cosine of B is 15/17, take the inverse to get the angle, add 60 and take the cosine of all of that? You get the same answer. Will this not always work?(20 votes)
- It will, but this is showing how to get the exact answer not a repeating decimal.(20 votes)

- Why is this so important to learn for life?(0 votes)
- The field of robotics requires knowlage of kinkamatics in order for a programmer and/or mechanical enginear to effectively program machinery. It takes a great deal of math to tell an artificial hand exactly how to help a disabled veteran tie his shoe.

The artificial hand has to know where it's parts are in virtual space, as compared to real space. This requires a working knowlage on how to mathematically describe angles and their position in third dimentional space.(54 votes)

- At4:45how did you determine that 8/17 multiplied by square root of 3 equaled 4 square root of 3 over 17?(10 votes)
- In multiplication you can divide the factors with each other. I can't really show you since I'm limited by a keyboard, but I'll try:

8/17* sqrt 3/2 <=>

8/2*sqrt 3/17 and 8/2 is 4, which he multiplied with sqrt 3/17. He's not doing anything fancy, just writing a fraction directly in simplest form. Excuse my bad English, I'm doing my best to explain.(8 votes)

- I've always wondered, why can't we just use the distributive property and simplify cos( x + y) to cos( x) + cos(y)?(5 votes)
- Because you can't distribute that function. It's similar to how (x + y)^2 is not equal to x^2 + y^2.(18 votes)

- Couldn't we just use the law of sines here? We have all the sides and one angle, so can't we find the other angles, add 60, and call it good that way?(7 votes)
- You can use the law of sines as well.

Here are the other ways to solve this problem I can think of:

- Using the law of cosines

- Using the inverse trig functions

One good thing of the way used in the video is that you don't have to use inverse functions, hence you don't get repeating decimal.(2 votes)

- Isn't it easier to just take arccos(15/17)≃28.07°, and then cos(28.07°+60°)?(3 votes)
- Yes, but the cosine angle identity could still help if you want an EXACT answer.(5 votes)

- if that's assumed to be a 30 60 90 then the cos(<abc + 60) = cos(90) then will the last simplified terms at4:50simplify to 0?(1 vote)
- Yes, that would be true if the triangle was a 30 60 90 triangle and <abc was the 30 degree angle. However, you can't assume that that's the case in this problem. The 8, 15, 17 side lengths don't align with the x, xsqrt(3), and 2x side lengths that every 30 60 90 triangle has, meaning that <abc is not 30 degrees in the problem.(8 votes)

- In what video is this angle addition formula derived?(3 votes)
- The triangle is assumed to be 30 60 90 triangle.

1/2, sqrt(3)/2, 1

But the sides 8 and 17 are not proportionate to 1/2 and 1.

Please clarify.(2 votes)- It is your original statement that is not correct, the triangle is not assumed to be any given angle.

Sal is using a trig identity to find cos(<ABC+60). So he finds the cos and sin of the triangle and also uses the sin and cos of the 30-60-90 triangle to find the answer. The two triangles in question are not congruent as you assumed.(4 votes)

## Video transcript

We've got triangle ABC here. It looks like a right triangle. We can verify that it is because
it satisfies the Pythagorean theorem. 8 squared is 64 plus
15 squared is 225. 64 plus 225 is 289,
which is 17 squared. So it satisfies the
Pythagorean theorem. So we know that this right
over here is a right triangle. But what they're
asking us is-- what is the cosine of
angle ABC, which is this angle right over
here plus 60 degrees. Now, just like
this, I don't have any clear way of evaluating it. But we do have some trig
identities in our toolkit that we could use to
express this in a way that we might be
able to evaluate it. In particular, we know
that the cosine of A plus B is equal to the cosine of
A times the cosine of B minus the sine of A
times the sine of B. So we could do the
exact same thing here with the cosine of angle
ABC plus 60 degrees. This is going to be equal
to-- and let me just write out the whole thing--
the cosine of angle ABC times the cosine of 60
degrees minus the sine of angle ABC times the sine
of 60 degrees. So this right over
here is angle ABC. This is angle ABC. And this is 60 degrees,
and this is 60 degrees. So let's evaluate
each of these things. What is the cosine of angle
ABC going to be equal to? I'll do that over here. The cosine of angle ABC. Well, we could go
back to Sohcahtoa. Let me write it down. Cosine is defined as the
adjacent-- for this angle-- the adjacent over
the hypotenuse. So cosine of angle ABC
is equal to 15 over 17. So this right over
here is 15 over 17. What is the cosine
of 60 degrees? Well, for there, we have to turn
back to our knowledge of 30, 60, 90 triangles. So if I have a triangle
like this-- so let me do my best
here-- to construct a 30, 60, 90 right triangle. So that's a 60-degree side. This is a 30-degree side. We know-- and we've seen
this multiple times-- if the hypotenuse has
length 1, the side opposite the 30-degree
side is one half. And then, the side
opposite the 60-degree side is square root of 3 times this. So it's square root of 3 over 2. So the cosine of 60
degrees-- if you're looking at this side
right over here. And let me write it in a
color I haven't used yet. So I care about the
cosine of 60 degrees. The cosine of 60
degrees is going to be equal to, once again,
adjacent over hypotenuse. One half over 1. it's going to be equal
to one half over 1, which is equal to one half. Now, let's think about the sine. Now, let's think about
the sine of angle ABC. So that's this one
right over here. So we have our
triangle right here. Sine is opposite
over hypotenuse. So opposite has length 8. Over hypotenuse, is 17. So it's equal to 8 over 17. And then, finally,
we need to figure out what the sign of 60 degrees is. Well, for the 60-degree
side of this right triangle, opposite over hypotenuse. So square root of
3 over 2 over 1, which is just the
square root of 3 over 2. So we have all of
the information we need to evaluate it. So this was the
sine of 60 degrees. This whole thing is
going to evaluate to cosine of angle ABC is
15 over 17 times cosine of 60 degrees is one half. So times one half. And then, we're
going to subtract sine of ABC, which is 8 over 17. And then, times
sine of 60, which is square root of 3 over 2. So times the square
root of 3 over 2. And now, we just have to
simplify it a little bit. So this is going to be
equal to-- if I multiply one half times this, let's see. It's going to be 15 over
34 minus-- and let's see. We're dividing by 2. So it's 4/17ths. I'll write this 4 square
roots of 3 over 17. And that's about as
simple as I could do it. If I wanted, I could have a
common denominator here of 34. And then, I could add the
2, so it could be 8 squared. So 3 over 34, but that still
won't simplify it that much. So this is a
reasonable good answer for what they are asking for. 15 over 34 minus 4 square
roots of 3 over 17.