Main content

## Algebra 1 (Eureka Math/EngageNY)

### Unit 4: Lesson 14

Topic C: Lessons 20-22: Scaling and transforming graphs- Scaling & reflecting parabolas
- Scale & reflect parabolas
- Identifying function transformations
- Identifying horizontal squash from graph
- Reflecting & compressing functions
- Identify function transformations
- Transforming the square-root function
- Graphs of square-root functions
- Square-root functions & their graphs
- Radical functions & their graphs
- Graphs of square and cube root functions

© 2023 Khan AcademyTerms of usePrivacy PolicyCookie Notice

# Radical functions & their graphs

CCSS.Math: ,

Practice some problems before going into the exercise.

## Introduction

#### In this article, we will practice a couple of problems where we should match the appropriate graph to a given radical function.

### Practice question 1: Square-root function

The graph of y, equals, square root of, x, end square root is shown below.

### Practice question 2: Cube-root function

The graph of y, equals, cube root of, x, end cube root is shown below.

## Want to join the conversation?

- I am confused as how to graph a cube root equation when there is a negative exponent outside of the radical. Can someone help?(33 votes)
- (cbrt(a+5))^(-8) does not equal (cbrt(a+5))^(1/8)

(cbrt(a+5))^(-8) = 1/((cbrt(a+5))^8) which then equals 1/((a+5)^(8/3))

****cbrt means cube root****(4 votes)

- I'm really confused with the cube roots part; Sal didn't talk about it any of the videos, I'm not finding the "Show Answer" here helpful, and I can't figure it out.(10 votes)
- Cube roots are pretty similar to square roots, except that their value is the number that, when multiplied by itself three times, is equal to the number under the radical, just as the square root of a number is the number that, when multiple by itself twice, is equal to the number under the radical. For example, the cube root of 8 is 2, because 2 x 2 x 2 is 8, just as the square root of 4 is 2, because 2 x 2 is 4. So, to graph a cube root function, you find the perfect cubes (numbers like 1 (1 x 1 x 1), 8 (2 x 2 x 2), 27 (3 x 3 x3), -1 (-1 x -1 x -1), -8 (-2 x -2 x -2), -27 (-3 x -3 x -3) etc.) and plot them on the graph. Then, just "connect the dots" and you have the graph (or at least a good approximation.) All the rules of shifting and stretching functions that apply to square root functions apply to cube root functions as well. (Note, however, that cube root functions give value outputs for negative values for x, since you are multiplying it three times, ensuring a real number value.)

I hope that helps.(27 votes)

- Is there a secret method to graphing the cubic root and the square root without a graphing calculator?(4 votes)
- You can graph just about anything by hand by evaluating the function at enough points and plotting all of them.(5 votes)

- How do I graph a cube root function that has x as a negative as opposed to the negative being outside the radical?(6 votes)
- I am confused on how we are supposed to change the graph when the x on the inside of the radical is negative.(5 votes)
- sqrt(-x) is reflected over the y axis, in fact any function with a -x inside of it (like (-x)^2 or 1/(-x) ) is reflected over the y axis.

You want to be careful though, if you had something like sqrt(-5x+25) you may think it is moved to the left by 25, but this is not the case. If you have a number multiplying x you want to factor it out. so it becomes sqrt(-5(x-5)) so it is moved to the right by 5. the -5 means it is flipped over the y axis, because it's negative, and it is squished horizontally by a factor of 5.

when you have a function like this you want to do the stretching/ shrinking first, then the shifting. In fact with all graph transformations you want to start witht he parent function, in this case that's sqrt(x), then in oder you want to apply the vertical stretch, horizontal shrink, horizontal shift and finally verical shift. The main point is doing the shifts after the stretching/ shrinking. so in sqrt(-5(x-5) you want to imagine sqrt(x) and squish it horizontally by 5 after flipping it over the y axis. this means you take all points and divide the x terms by -5. so (1,1) becomes (-1/5, 1) then you do the horizontal shift of -5, which is 5 to the right. this adds 5 to all x values, so (-1/5, 1) becomes (24/5, 1).

I want to repeat, it's super important to do the stretches/ shrinks first then the shifts.

Let me know if this didn't help.(3 votes)

- Is there a video on cube root functions? Or do you not need to know about cube root functions for the question? Basically, I'm asking if the question wants you to know anything about cube root graphs.(4 votes)
- For this question, knowledge of cube-root functions is not required. The question is simply trying to show the connection between square and cube root functions. If you take the graph of a y = x^3 function and reflect it over the line y = x, it will look like a sideways y = x^3 graph (or cube-root graph), like how a "sideways" parabola (y = x^2) is a radical function (well, half of a sideways parabola, anyway, because of domain issues.)

Basically, just imagine the graph of y = x^3, turn it 90 degrees clockwise, and do translations as necessary.(4 votes)

- What's the order of operation for function ?(4 votes)
- In practice question 2: how is C the answer? for example, using a value of 7 for x, the equation goes as follows: 7+2=9 cube root of 9=3 multiply by -1 = -3 plus 5 = 2?(3 votes)
- I am confused about the first one(3 votes)
- I'm really confused how to tell which graph corresponds to the cube root function, can anyone explain why the graph of the function does not flip over the x-axis even though the negative is on the outside of the radical?(1 vote)
- You referred to both cube root and square root. I'm going to assume you are referring to the 1st problem which is the square root function.

The minus in front of the square root specifies that we use the negative root. For example: -sqrt(9) = -3, not 3; and not +/-3. It is just -3.

Remember, functions create one output for each input.

If the function did flip over the x-axis and create a full parabola, then it would not be a function. One input would need to create 2 outputs for this to happen.

Hope this helps.(3 votes)