- Slope of a line secant to a curve
- Secant line with arbitrary difference
- Secant line with arbitrary point
- Secant lines & average rate of change with arbitrary points
- Secant line with arbitrary difference (with simplification)
- Secant line with arbitrary point (with simplification)
- Secant lines & average rate of change with arbitrary points (with simplification)
- Secant lines: challenging problem 1
- Secant lines: challenging problem 2
Secant lines: challenging problem 1
Sal solves a challenging problem involving slopes of secant lines to a curve. Created by Sal Khan.
Want to join the conversation?
- What is the difference between the tangent and secant lines?(25 votes)
- A secant line intersects the curve locally in exactly two points. A tangent line intersects the curve locally in exactly one point.(134 votes)
- Once we establish that the slope of the secant line over [a, 0] is greater than a line with a slope of 1, how do we extrapolate that to mean that f(-a) is less than that (around4:00, part I)? Is it implied that f(-a) atually means "the slope of the line tangent to f(-a)?" Or am I forgetting something that says if the slope is greater, then the value of the function is always greater?(17 votes)
- The actual numeric value of f(-a) is less than 1 (as Sal points out between0:45-1:00). He later shows that the value of the slope (average rate of change) between points (-a,f(-a)) and (0,1)) is greater than 1. (That's the 1-f(-a)/-a, part).
So he is ultimately comparing the two values, not two slopes. It was confusing to me too, at first. :)(18 votes)
- What is the slope 1 line for?(6 votes)
- It's to compare the secant line to see whether the slope is greater than or less than to 1.(7 votes)
- I don't know what f means, when I started doing calculus I saw stuff like f(x) which I thought sal would explain, but now I need to know to understand this video.(4 votes)
- You should have had that in a previous course. So, you may need to review Algebra II or Pre-calculus.
f(x) is a symbol that means "a function of the variable x". You then need to define what that function is. NOTE: this notation does NOT mean f times x.
f(x) = 3x²+x-4
Means you have defined the function f(x) to mean 3x²+x-4
Once we have that definition, we can replace the x with any valid mathematical entity. For example
f(7) means to replace x in the definition with the number 7.
f(7) = 3(7)²+ 7 - 4 = 150
But we are not limited to numbers, we can plug any valid mathematical entity we like
For example, f(9x+π) would be to replace all of the x's in the definition with "9x+π":
f(9x+π) = 3(9x+π)² + (9x+π) - 4
Finally, we can use letters other than f for the function notation, usually if we need to use more than one function in a problem. Common letters to use in defining a function are f, g, and h -- though we can use most any letter we like.(9 votes)
- "A secant line intersects the curve locally in exactly two points. A tangent line intersects the curve locally in exactly one point. "
So what about the Cosecant?(2 votes)
- The names for most of the trig functions have to do with how they may be constructed with respect to the unit circle. Both the tangent and the cotangent can be defined as lengths of segments of a line that is tangent to the unit circle. Secant and cosecant are lengths of segments of lines secant to the unit circle. The words sine, secant, and tangent come from Latin. 'Sinus' means bending, 'secans' means cutting, and 'tangens' means touching.(12 votes)
- If this topic is differential calculus, what is integral calculus?(3 votes)
- Differential Calculus is all about calculating change, or how much a function wiggles or how fast it wiggles. We study all these rules for calculating this change such as the product rule, chain rule, power rule, etc.
Integral Calculus is a little more abstract and a little harder to understand - it's main focus is to find the area under a curve. As Keith said, integrating is really just the reverse process of differential calculus. But there are even more methods than just reversing the process, there are series methods - and even other types of integration. Also the theory seems to me to be a little more abstract with greatest lower bounds and least upper bounds.(5 votes)
- Sal mostly proved everything visually but how do I prove them mathematically?(6 votes)
- maybe you can consult your textbook or just wiki it, and i believe this ( what Sal did ) is to help you understand more directly because you may sometimes find the mathematical proof a real mess to understand(2 votes)
- Why is it ( x, f(x)) and not (x , y )?(1 vote)
- Because we defined y = f(x).
So we can replace y in (x , y) with f(x). It becomes (x , f(x))(4 votes)
- See1:47into the video. Referring to the denominator, why is it 0-(-a) and not (-a)-0. Thanks ;)(1 vote)
- You could do that, but the answer would be the same.
For example, if the 2 points were (9,2) and (7,5),
5-2/7-9 would equal 3/-2, which equals -(3/2.) If you switched the order, it would be 2-5/9-7, which is -3/2. The answers are the same. It does not matter which you put first, as long as when you put the y value of it first, then that point's x value has to be in front too.(4 votes)
- All I knew from this point secant is just the reciprocal of cos. So if cos x = adj/hyp, then secant x = hyp/adj. But I feel like it doesn't correlate with the video, because (change in y)/(change in x) is not the same as hyp/adjacent. Do i miss something here?(1 vote)
- What you are missing is the the word "secant" is being used with a different meaning. A secant line is not the same thing as a secant function.
A secant line is a straight line that intersects your function in exactly two locations locally (it might intersect your function somewhere else, but in the region of interest, it intersects your function in exactly two locations).(4 votes)
Consider the graph of the function f of x that passes through three points as shown. So these are the three points, and this curve in blue is f of x. Identify which of the statements are true. So they give us these statements. Let's see. This first one says f of negative a is less than 1 minus f of negative a over a. So this seems like some type of a bizarre statement. How are we able to figure out whether this is true from this right over here? So let's just go piece by piece and see if something starts to make sense. So f of negative a, where do we see that here? Well, this is f of negative a. This is the point x equals negative a. So this is negative a, and this is y is equal to f of negative a. So this is f of negative a right over here. And what we know about f of negative a, based on looking at this graph, is that f of negative a is between 0 and 1. So we can write that. 0 is less than f of negative a, which is less than 1. So that's all I can deduce about f of negative a right from the get-go. Now let's look at this crazy statement, 1 minus f of negative a over a. What is this? Well, let's think about what happens if we take the secant line, if we're trying to find the slope of the secant line, between this point and this point, if we wanted to find the average rate of change between the point negative a, f of negative a, and the point 0, 1. If this is our endpoint, our change in y is going to be 1 minus f of negative a. So 1 minus f of negative a is equal to our change in y. And our change in x, going from negative a to 0, so change in x is going to be equal to 0 minus negative a, which is equal to positive a. So this right over here is essentially our change in x over our change in y from this point to this point. It is our average rate of change from this point to this point. So it is our average rate of change, or you could say it's the slope of the secant line. So the secant line would look something like this. Slope of the secant line, so this right over here is slope of secant line between from f of negative a to 0 comma 1. So just looking at this diagram right over here, what do we know about this slope? And in particular, can we make any statements about that slope relative to, say, 0 or 1 or anything like that? Well, let's think about what a line of slope 1 would look like. Well, a line of slope 1, especially one that went through this point right over here, would look something like this. A line of slope 1 would look something like this. So this line right over here that I've just drawn that goes from negative 1 comma 0 to 0, 1, this has slope 1. So this slope is equal to 1. So if this green line has a slope of 1, does this blue line have a slope-- it clearly has a different slope. Is that slope, is this blue line steeper or less steep than the green line? Well, it's pretty clear that this secant line is steeper than the green line. It's increasing faster. So it's going to have a higher slope. So this, looking at it from this diagram, this blue line has a slope higher than 1. Or the slope of the secant line from negative a, f of negative a, to 0 comma 1, that is going to be greater than 1. So this thing right over here is greater than 1. So we're able to deduce, this thing right over here is less than 1. This thing over here is greater than 1. So this thing is less than that thing. So this must be true. Now let's look at this one. We're comparing the slope of the secant line. We're comparing the slope of the secant line that we just looked at. So this is the same value right over here. So we're comparing this slope right over here, to what's this? f of a minus 1 over a. Well, this is the slope of this secant line, this is the slope of this secant line that I'm drawing in this-- let me do it in more contrast. Let me do it in orange. That is the slope of this secant line. So which one has a higher slope? Well, it's pretty clear that the blue secant line has a higher slope than this orange secant line. But here, it's saying that the blue's slope is lower than the orange. So this is not going to be true. So this is not true. Then finally, let's look at this over here-- f of a minus f of negative a over 2a. So this is the slope. Let me draw this. So this right over here, this is the slope of the secant line between this point and this point right over here. Our change in y is f of a minus f of negative a. Our change in x is a minus negative a, which is 2a. So this is this secant line right over here. So let me draw it. So this secant line right over here, so they're comparing that slope to this slope. f of a minus 1 is our change in y, over a is our change in x. So we're comparing it to that one right over there. And you could immediately eyeball this kind of brownish, maroon-- I guess it's kind of a brown color-- this secant line that goes all the way from here to here is clearly steeper than this one right over here. And we know that, that the average rate of change from here to here is going to be higher than the average rate of change from here to here, because at least from negative a to 0, we were increasing at a much faster rate. And then we slowed down to this rate. So the average over the entire interval is definitely going to be more than what we get from 0 to a. So this one is also not true. This has a higher-- we actually know that this is false. Both of these would have been true if we swapped these signs around, if this was a greater than sign, if this was a greater than sign. So this is the only one that applies.