If you're seeing this message, it means we're having trouble loading external resources on our website.

If you're behind a web filter, please make sure that the domains *.kastatic.org and *.kasandbox.org are unblocked.

Main content

### Course: AP®︎/College Statistics>Unit 13

Lesson 1: Confidence intervals for the slope of a regression model

# Introduction to inference about slope in linear regression

Introduction to sample slopes and using them to make confidence intervals or do a test about the population slope in least-squares regression .

## Want to join the conversation?

• Can someone please explains this to me in a way an eighth grader would get it? I am so so confused.
(7 votes)
• Basically, what Sal is saying here is that since we don't know the true population statistics but we know the sample ( a portion from the population) statistics, we can use the sample stats to find out the population stats.

When we take many different samples, we get different regression lines () SO WE CAN ONLY ESTIMATE THE TRUE POPULATION STATISTICS AND REGRESSION LINE.

*a) Confidence interval:*
Since we don't know the actual regression line's slope, we use the sample regression line's slope to estimate it (b2). Also, because we don't know the populations actual standard deviation we use the critical value t and use the Standard Error of the statistic as we are only estimating. Therefore, the confidence interval is b2 +/- t × SE(b).

*b) Hypothesis Testing:*
The null hypothesis is that the slope of the population regression line is 0. that is Ho : B =0. So, anything other than that will be the alternate hypothesis and thus, Ha : B≠0.

This is the stuff covered in the video and I hope it helps! :)
(13 votes)
• I think you should have chosen Shoe Size as Dependent Variable & Height as Independent Variable. So, Shoe Size should be shown on y axis.
(3 votes)
• The reason shoe size is independent in this case and is on the x-axis is that this regression line is being used to predict the height based on the shoe size. So, the height contextually depends on the shoe size.
(8 votes)
• Can someone do it with a table and explain how to solve it without a calculator or is it just easy doing it with a calculator? :)
(2 votes)
• Can someone please help me to understand why the sampling distribution of sample b-slopes has normal shape (which allows us to construct CI or do hypothesis testing)
And what connection does it have with those conditions for inference, namely with normality and equal variance?
(2 votes)
• Can you explain ??
(1 vote)
• Regarding notation: Shouldn't the "y" denoting the population parameter be simply "y" instead of "y^", to differentiate from the estimator "y^" (statistic)?
(1 vote)

## Video transcript

- [Instructor] In this video, we're going to talk about regression lines, but it's not gonna be the first time we're talking about regression lines. And so if the idea of a regression is foreign to you, I encourage you to watch the introductory videos on it. Here we're gonna think about how we can make inferences from a regression line. And so if the idea of statistical inference is new to you or hypothesis testing, once again, watch those videos as well. But let's say we think there's a positive association between shoe size and height. And so what we might want to do is we could, here on the horizontal axis, that is shoe size. Our sizes could go size one, two, three, four, five, six, seven, eight, nine, 10, 11, 12, and it could keep going up from there. And then, on this height, or on this axis, our y-axis, this would be height, so one foot, two feet, three feet, four feet, five feet, six feet, seven feet. And then you could, to see if there's an association, you might take a sample. Let's say you take a random sample of 20 people from the population. And in future videos, we'll talk about the conditions necessary for making appropriate inferences. Let's say those 20 people are these 20 data points. So there's a young child, and maybe there's a grown adult, with bigger feet and who's taller. And then three, four, five, six, seven, eight, nine, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, and so you have these 20 data points. And then what you're likely to do is input them into a computer. You could do it by hand, but we have computers now to do that for us usually. And the computer could try to fit a regression line. And there's many techniques for doing it, but one typical technique is to try to overall minimize the squared distance between these points and that line. And this regression line will have an equation, as any line would have. And we tend to show that as saying y hat, this hat tells us that this is a regression line, is equal to the y-intercept, a plus the slope times our x variable. So this right over here would be a. Now, to be clear, if you took another sample, you might get different results here. In fact, let's call this y sub one for our first sample, a sub one, b sub one, and this is a sub one. If you were to take another sample of 20 folks, so let's do that. Maybe you get one, two, three, four, five, six, seven, eight, nine, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20 and then you tried to fit a line to that, that line might look something like this. It might have a slightly different y-intercept and a slightly different slope. So we could call that, for the second sample, y sub two or y hat sub two is equal to a sub two plus b sub two times x. And so every time you take a sample, you are likely to get different results for these values, which are essentially statistics. Remember, statistics are things that we can get from samples, and we're trying to estimate true population parameters. Well, what would be the true population parameters we're trying to estimate? Well, imagine a world, imagine a world here, that you are able to find out the true linear relationship, or maybe there is some true linear relationship between shoe size and height. You could get it if theoretically you could measure every human being on the planet. And depending what you define as a population, it could be all living people or all people who will ever live. This isn't practical, but let's just say that you actually could. And you would have billions of data points here for the true population. And then if you were to fit a regression line to that, you could view this as the true population regression line. And so that would be y hat is equal to, and to make it clear that here, the y-intercept and the slope, this would be the true population parameters. Instead of saying a, we say alpha. And instead of saying b, we say beta times x. But it's very hard to come up exactly with what alpha and beta are, and so that's why we estimate it with a's and b's based on a sample. Now, what's interesting, with this in mind, is we can start to make inferences based on our sample. So we know that, for example, b sub two is unlikely to be exactly beta. But how confident can we be that there is at least a positive linear relationship or a nonzero linear relationship? Or can we create a confidence interval around this statistic in order to have a good sense of where the true parameter might actually be? And the simple answer is yes. And to do so, we'll use the same exact ideas that we did when we made inferences based on proportions or based on means. The way that you can make an inference, for example, for your true population slope of your regression line, say, okay, I took a sample, I got this slope right over here, so I'll just call that b two, and then I could create a confidence interval around that. And so that confidence interval is going to be based on some critical value times, ideally, the standard deviation of the sampling distribution of your sample statistic. In this case, it would be the sample regression line slope. But because we don't know exactly what this is, we can't figure out precisely what this is going to be from a sample, we are going to estimate it with what's known as the standard error of the statistic. And we'll go into more depth in this in future videos. And since we're estimating here, we're going to use a critical t-value here, which we have studied before. And so based on your confidence level you want to have, let's say it's 95%, based on the degrees of freedom, which we'll see will come out of how many data points we have, we can figure this out. And from our sample, we can figure this out, and we can figure this out. And then we would have constructed a confidence interval. We'll also see that you could do hypothesis testing here. You could say, hey, let's set up a null hypothesis, and the null hypothesis is going to be that there is no nonzero linear relationship or that the true population slope of the regression line or slope of the population regression line is equal to zero and that the alternative hypothesis is that the true relationship could either be greater than zero, it's a positive linear relationship, or that it's just nonzero. And then what you could do is, assuming this, you could see what's the probability of getting a statistic that is at least this extreme or more extreme? And if that's below some threshold, you might reject the null hypothesis, which would suggest the alternative. So this and this are things that we have done before where you're creating a confidence interval around a statistic or you're doing hypothesis testing, making assumptions about a true parameter. The only difference here is that the parameter that we're trying to estimate are going to be the parameters for a theoretical population regression line, and we're going to do that using sample statistics for a sample regression line.