If you're seeing this message, it means we're having trouble loading external resources on our website.

If you're behind a web filter, please make sure that the domains *.kastatic.org and *.kasandbox.org are unblocked.

Main content

Justification with the mean value theorem

AP.CALC: FUN‑1 (EU), FUN‑1.B (LO), FUN‑1.B.1 (EK)

Problem

Let f, left parenthesis, x, right parenthesis, equals, 2, start superscript, x, end superscript, minus, start text, s, i, n, end text, left parenthesis, pi, x, right parenthesis.
Below is Rafael's attempt to write a formal justification for the fact that the equation f, prime, left parenthesis, x, right parenthesis, equals, start fraction, 1, divided by, 4, end fraction has a solution where minus, 2, is less than, x, is less than, minus, 1.
Is Rafael's justification complete? If not, why?
Rafael's justification:
Exponential and trigonometric functions are differentiable and continuous at all points in their domain, and minus, 2, is less than or equal to, x, is less than or equal to, minus, 1 is within f's domain.
So, according to the mean value theorem, f, prime, left parenthesis, x, right parenthesis, equals, start fraction, 1, divided by, 4, end fraction must have a solution somewhere in the interval minus, 2, is less than, x, is less than, minus, 1.
Choose 1 answer:
Stuck?
Stuck?